Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 2 681 In part two of this dispatch, Tokyo told Berlin that one particular clause in the note the United States had handed the Japanese ambassadors on November 26 was especially “insulting.” Th at clause meant in eff ect that “in case the United States enters the European war at any time the Japanese Empire will not be allowed to give assistance to Germany and Italy” in accord with their Tri-Partite Alliance. Th is clause alone, let alone others, makes it impossible to fi nd any basis in the American proposal for negotiations. What is more, before the United States brought forth this plan, they conferred with England, Australia, the Netherlands, and China—they did so repeatedly. Th erefore, it is clear that the United States is now in collusion with those nations and has decided to regard Japan, along with Germany and Italy, as an enemy. 26 Kimmel said the Navy Department had realized that “the high point in the crisis in Japanese-American aff airs would be reached when the Japanese reply to the American note of November 26 was received and the Department had been looking for it ever since that date.” 27 Kimmel’s Instructions: Carry out War Plan 46 Stark’s November 27 “war warning” had advised Kimmel that an aggressive move by Japan is expected within the next few days. Th e number and equipment of Japanese troops and the organization of naval task forces indicates an amphibious expedition against either the Philippines Th ai or Kra Peninsula or 26Ibid., pp. 2854–55. See also ibid., part 12, pp. 205–06, Japanese Message #986. 27Ibid., part 6, p. 2549.

682 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy possibly Borneo. Execute an appropriate defensive deployment preparatory to carrying out the tasks assigned in WPL46. 28 Washington’s attention was apparently focused on southeast Asia, and Kimmel’s attention was also directed there by this “war warning.” Kimmel testifi ed that also on November 27, the Navy Department “suggested that I send from the immediate vicinity of Pearl Harbor [to Wake and Midway] the carriers of the fl eet which constituted the fl eet’s main striking defense against an air attack.” Th at same day, he said, the war and navy departments suggested that we send from the island of Oahu, 50 percent of the Army’s resources in pursuit planes. . . . In these circumstances no reasonable man in my position would consider that the “war warning” was intended to suggest the likelihood of an attack in the Hawaiian area. 29 Kimmel found his pre-attack instructions most confusing, presenting him with a “Do-Don’t” situation. Th e November 29 Navy message had told him that “the United States desires that Japan commit the fi rst overt act. . . . [U]ndertake such reconnaissance and other measures as you deem necessary but these measures should be carried out so as not repeat not to alarm civil population or disclose intent. . . . Undertake no off ensive action until Japan has committed an overt act.” 30 Army Message #472 of November 27 had given similar instructions to Short. 31 Kimmel explained: 28Ibid., part 14, p. 1406, Navy Department Dispatch 272337. 29Ibid., part 6, p. 2520. 30Ibid., part 14, p. 1407, CNO Message #290110, dated November 29, drafted November 28, 1941. 31Ibid., p. 1328, Army Message #472, November 27, 1941.

682 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

possibly Borneo. Execute an appropriate defensive deployment<br />

preparatory to carrying out the tasks assigned in WPL46. 28<br />

Washington’s attention was apparently focused on southeast<br />

Asia, <strong>and</strong> Kimmel’s attention was also directed there by this “war<br />

warning.”<br />

Kimmel testifi ed that also on November 27, the Navy<br />

Department “suggested that I send from the immediate vicinity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> [to Wake <strong>and</strong> Midway] the carriers <strong>of</strong> the fl eet<br />

which constituted the fl eet’s main striking defense against an air<br />

attack.” Th at same day, he said, the war <strong>and</strong> navy departments<br />

suggested that we send from the isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Oahu, 50 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Army’s resources in pursuit planes. . . . In these circumstances<br />

no reasonable man in my position would consider that<br />

the “war warning” was intended to suggest the likelihood <strong>of</strong> an<br />

attack in the Hawaiian area. 29<br />

Kimmel found his pre-attack instructions most confusing,<br />

presenting him with a “Do-Don’t” situation. Th e November 29<br />

Navy message had told him that “the United States desires that<br />

Japan commit the fi rst overt act. . . . [U]ndertake such reconnaissance<br />

<strong>and</strong> other measures as you deem necessary but these<br />

measures should be carried out so as not repeat not to alarm civil<br />

population or disclose intent. . . . Undertake no <strong>of</strong>f ensive action<br />

until Japan has committed an overt act.” 30 Army Message #472 <strong>of</strong><br />

November 27 had given similar instructions to Short. 31<br />

Kimmel explained:<br />

28Ibid., part 14, p. 1406, Navy Department Dispatch 272337.<br />

29Ibid., part 6, p. 2520.<br />

30Ibid., part 14, p. 1407, CNO Message #290110, dated November 29, drafted<br />

November 28, 1941.<br />

31Ibid., p. 1328, Army Message #472, November 27, 1941.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!