01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

678 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

warned Kimmel (March 3, 1941) that the enactment <strong>of</strong> lendlease<br />

would make the supply situation still worse; it would bring<br />

about an “enormous—almost astronomical”—dem<strong>and</strong> for ordnance<br />

supplies for the British Navy <strong>and</strong> Allies. 15 As a matter <strong>of</strong><br />

fact, 1,900 planes were sent abroad from February 1 to December<br />

1, 1941 (about 1,750 <strong>of</strong> them going to the British), <strong>and</strong> 1,900<br />

antiaircraft guns were distributed under lend-lease (some 1,500<br />

<strong>of</strong> them going to the British). Th at meant 1,900 fewer planes <strong>and</strong><br />

1,900 fewer antiaircraft guns available to improve <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>’s<br />

defenses. 16<br />

Kimmel’s Dearth <strong>of</strong> Information<br />

Kimmel may have found it diffi cult to obtain clear instructions<br />

<strong>and</strong> to procure the men <strong>and</strong> materiel needed to build the<br />

fl eet to fi ghting strength, but probably his chief complaint was<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> information. In his dual capacity as “the comm<strong>and</strong>er in<br />

chief <strong>of</strong> the United States Fleet <strong>and</strong> the comm<strong>and</strong>er in chief <strong>of</strong><br />

the Pacifi c Fleet,” he said he felt he was “entitled to every scrap <strong>of</strong><br />

information they had in Washington.” It need not have been supplied<br />

in full, he said; it could have been sent in summarized form.<br />

But he felt he was entitled to “all the essential information which<br />

had to do with the Pacifi c situation.” 17 According to Kimmel, he<br />

had received during July 1941 at least seven dispatches quoting<br />

intercepted Japanese messages. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, he had been<br />

given the impression that they were sending him all the important<br />

information available. Yet little or none <strong>of</strong> the information<br />

gleaned from later intercepts was furnished Kimmel. 18<br />

15 Ibid., part 6 pp. 2499–500, Nimitz March 3, 1941, letter to Kimmel.<br />

16 Ibid., part 10, pp. 4873–75, War Department February 14, 1946 memor<strong>and</strong>um<br />

furnished the Joint Congressional Committee at request <strong>of</strong> Seth W.<br />

Richardson, general counsel.<br />

17 Ibid., part 6, p. 2628.<br />

18 Ibid., p. 2540.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!