01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

676 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

* * * * *<br />

When the committee reconvened on January 14, 1946, there<br />

were still several important witnesses to be heard—notably Short<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kimmel, Saff ord, <strong>and</strong> the Army <strong>and</strong> Navy couriers Kramer<br />

<strong>and</strong> Bratton, respectively.<br />

Admiral Husb<strong>and</strong> E. Kimmel—<br />

Upon Appointment as CinC Begins<br />

Readying Fleet for War<br />

Kimmel was the lead-<strong>of</strong>f witness after the new legal staff took<br />

over. He began by reading a prepared statement to the committee.<br />

He said he realized the fl eet was vulnerable at <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>,<br />

but he had accepted the decision as “an historical fact.” 6<br />

Th e fl eet was not then ready for war. So, Kimmel said, he set<br />

out through “an intensive training program to make it ready.” 7<br />

As noted, there were shortages in Hawaii <strong>of</strong> planes, especially<br />

for reconnaissance <strong>and</strong> long-range attack, shortages also <strong>of</strong> plane<br />

crews <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> antiaircraft guns. 8 Kimmel visited Washington in<br />

June 1941 <strong>and</strong> discussed the matter with Stark. He also had some<br />

conversations on the subject with the president, who was “fully<br />

cognizant” <strong>of</strong> the problem. 9 By that time the fl eet had been substantially<br />

weakened by the shift to the Atlantic <strong>of</strong> a large contingent<br />

<strong>of</strong> ships, about one quarter <strong>of</strong> the fl eet. Kimmel told the<br />

committee he “felt that a strong Pacifi c Fleet was a real deterrent<br />

to Japan,” but that “a weaker [fl eet] might be an invitation”<br />

to attack. 10 According to his statement, Kimmel had argued<br />

6 Joint Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, part 6, p. 2498.<br />

7 Ibid., p. 2499.<br />

8 Ibid., pp. 2720, 2722.<br />

9 Ibid., p. 2719.<br />

10Ibid., p. 2565. See also part 16, pp. 2248–49, Kimmel letter to Stark,<br />

September 12, 1941.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!