Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 1 623 cryptographers had replicated in August 1940, yielded valuable intelligence known as MAGIC. Exhibit 1 consisted of diplomatic messages sent and received by the Japanese government and its foreign establishments which had been intercepted, deciphered and translated by U.S. cryptographers between July 1 and December 8, 1941. 15 Exhibit 2 contained intercepted messages concerning military matters such as military installations, ship movements, espionage reports, etc., sent and received by the Japanese government and its foreign establishments in “Purple” and other codes between December 2, 1940, and December 8, 1941. 16 Th e MAGIC information derived from these intercepts had been the basis of much pre-attack U.S. intelligence concerning the movements and intentions of the Japanese government. U.S. Ambassador Joseph C. Grew Reports Pre-attack Situation in Tokyo One of the fi rst witnesses was Joseph C. Grew, U.S. ambassador to Japan since 1932. After the attack he had been held under house arrest until June 25, 1942, when he was repatriated by the Japanese government. Grew testifi ed it was “obvious that by November 3 the [U.S.] trade embargoes had not served to restrain the Japanese Army from its expansion. Th ey were going right ahead.” 17 In his view, “the risk and danger of war was very great and increasing.” 18 Japan’s totalitarian regime’s propaganda was fostering anti-Americanism. And in Washington, the U.S.- Japanese negotiations were clearly deteriorating. Although Grew 15 Joint Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack, part 1, pp. 1–253. 16 Ibid., pp. 254–316. 17 Ibid., part 2, p. 677. 18 Ibid., p. 680.

624 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy never gave up hope, by early December it was apparent that war between Japan and the United States was expected. 19 ONI and WPD Jurisdictional Dispute Disrupts Customary Intelligence Dissemination One goal of the committee in investigating “the events and circumstances leading up to and following the attack” was to determine what had been known by the top offi cials before the attack in Washington, where secret Japanese messages were regularly being intercepted, deciphered and translated, and how much intelligence derived from these intercepts had been relayed before December 7 to the Pearl Harbor commanders. Th e situation was compounded by confusion over a jurisdictional dispute between the Offi ce of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and the Navy’s War Plans Division (WPD). When Kimmel took over the command of the Pacifi c Fleet in February 1941, he had asked CNO Stark to make sure that the responsibility for keeping him “fully informed with pertinent reports on subjects that should be of interest to the Fleet” be clearly determined “so that there will be no misunderstanding.” 20 Stark replied on March 22, that the chief of the Offi ce of Naval Intelligence, Captain Alan G. Kirk, was “fully aware of [ONI’s] responsibility in keeping you adequately informed.” 21 But the policy was changed. Admiral Richard K. Turner, chief of the Navy’s War Plans Division, had fought and won a battle with ONI for the exclusive right to prepare and disseminate to the fl eet commanders information about potential enemy plans and operations, including intelligence obtained by intercepting and decoding Japan’s most secret diplomatic messages. As Vice 19 Ibid. 20 Ibid., part 16, p. 2229. 21 Ibid., part 4, p. 1835.

Joint Congressional Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack: Part 1 623<br />

cryptographers had replicated in August 1940, yielded valuable<br />

intelligence known as MAGIC. Exhibit 1 consisted <strong>of</strong> diplomatic<br />

messages sent <strong>and</strong> received by the Japanese government <strong>and</strong> its foreign<br />

establishments which had been intercepted, deciphered <strong>and</strong><br />

translated by U.S. cryptographers between July 1 <strong>and</strong> December<br />

8, 1941. 15 Exhibit 2 contained intercepted messages concerning<br />

military matters such as military installations, ship movements,<br />

espionage reports, etc., sent <strong>and</strong> received by the Japanese government<br />

<strong>and</strong> its foreign establishments in “Purple” <strong>and</strong> other<br />

codes between December 2, 1940, <strong>and</strong> December 8, 1941. 16 Th e<br />

MAGIC information derived from these intercepts had been the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> much pre-attack U.S. intelligence concerning the movements<br />

<strong>and</strong> intentions <strong>of</strong> the Japanese government.<br />

U.S. Ambassador Joseph C. Grew<br />

Reports Pre-attack Situation in Tokyo<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the fi rst witnesses was Joseph C. Grew, U.S. ambassador<br />

to Japan since 1932. After the attack he had been held<br />

under house arrest until June 25, 1942, when he was repatriated<br />

by the Japanese government. Grew testifi ed it was “obvious that<br />

by November 3 the [U.S.] trade embargoes had not served to<br />

restrain the Japanese Army from its expansion. Th ey were going<br />

right ahead.” 17 In his view, “the risk <strong>and</strong> danger <strong>of</strong> war was very<br />

great <strong>and</strong> increasing.” 18 Japan’s totalitarian regime’s propag<strong>and</strong>a<br />

was fostering anti-Americanism. And in Washington, the U.S.-<br />

Japanese negotiations were clearly deteriorating. Although Grew<br />

15 Joint Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, part 1, pp. 1–253.<br />

16 Ibid., pp. 254–316.<br />

17 Ibid., part 2, p. 677.<br />

18 Ibid., p. 680.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!