01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Joint Congressional Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack: Part 1 621<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the facts connected with the <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> disaster.” 13 Yet<br />

the congressional committee was soon embroiled in politics.<br />

Th e makeup <strong>of</strong> the committee, with six Democrats <strong>and</strong> four<br />

Republicans, was stacked in favor <strong>of</strong> the administration. Th e<br />

Republicans maintained that their access to government records<br />

was being restricted <strong>and</strong> that the Democratic majority was trying<br />

to curb, by strict party-line vote, the scope <strong>of</strong> the inquiry. No<br />

provision was made for a staff to assist the Republican members.<br />

Th e Democrats claimed the Republicans were anxious to use the<br />

inquiry to smear Roosevelt, while the Republicans implied the<br />

Democrats were trying to shield the Roosevelt administration.<br />

House Majority Leader John W. McCormack accused the committee<br />

minority <strong>of</strong> “witchhunting.” 14<br />

Th is account <strong>of</strong> the Congressional hearings is pretty much<br />

factual <strong>and</strong> non-partisan. Th e events are presented more or less<br />

in the order in which the witnesses to them appeared before the<br />

Committee. Some witnesses contradicted other witnesses, some<br />

even contradicted their own earlier testimony, <strong>and</strong> the recollections<br />

<strong>of</strong> others were <strong>of</strong>ten confused or hazy. Pressure may have been<br />

used to persuade some witnesses to change their stories. JCC Committee<br />

members <strong>of</strong>ten encountered diffi culty in obtaining access to information.<br />

Also, friends <strong>of</strong> the administration sometimes tried to sidetrack<br />

the probing into sensitive issues by disrupting the proceedings.<br />

Th us a study <strong>of</strong> the hearings alone yields a rather disjointed<br />

picture. Only after trying to reconcile the various contradictions<br />

<strong>and</strong> confusions <strong>and</strong> arranging the events revealed chronologically,<br />

as has been done in the fi nal chapter <strong>of</strong> this book, is it possible to<br />

recognize the roles played by the several principals involved in the<br />

<strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> disaster—their actions, inactions, their negligence<br />

<strong>and</strong> dilatoriness.<br />

13Congressional Record, September 6, 1945, reprinted in Joint Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong><br />

<strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, part 1, p. 22.<br />

14Th e New York Times, November 15, 1945, p. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!