Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

617 27. Joint Congressional Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack November 15, 1945–May 31, 1946: Part 1 After almost four years of fi ghting on land, sea, and in the air, after the detonation of two atomic bombs on Japan—one on Hiroshima (August 6) and the other on Nagasaki (August 8)—the Japanese fi nally admitted defeat. On August 25 Emperor Hirohito broadcast to the Japanese people that the country’s forces were surrendering. August 25, 1945, was declared V-J Day. World War II had ended. A couple of weeks later—on August 29—the new president, Harry S. Truman, who had taken offi ce after the death of President Roosevelt on April 12, 1945, released the reports of the Army Pearl Harbor Board and Navy Court of Inquiry. 1 A veritable fi restorm erupted. Th e earlier Roberts Commission had found 1 New York Times, August 30, 1945. pp. 1, 4, 5, 6, and S. 6-15.

618 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy the two Hawaiian commanders, Admiral Kimmel and General Short, guilty of “derelictions of duty” and “errors of judgment” and they had been retired from service and demoted in rank. Th e Army and Navy reports released by Truman eff ectively absolved Kimmel and Short of blame and placed much of the responsibility on four top-level Washington offi cials—Secretary of State Cordell Hull, Army Chief of Staff General George C. Marshall, Chief of the Army’s war plans division General Leonard T. Gerow, and Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold R. Stark. As the New York Times reported, It was not a pretty story that President Truman released in making public War and Navy reports on the reasons why Army and Navy offi cials at Oahu were taken by surprise in the Japanese attack on Dec. 7, 1941. 2 In spite of the volume of material released by Truman, the public still was not satisfi ed. Th ere were obvious omissions. Under orders of the secretary of war and the secretary of the navy, sections of both reports had been deleted. And Top Secret portions were still being withheld. In the words of Senate Majority Leader Alben Barkley, the reports were “confusing and confl icting when compared with one another, and to some extent contain contradictions and inconsistencies.” 3 Moreover, both Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Navy Secretary James Forrestal had, according to Senator Homer Ferguson, “issued critical opinions of the fi ndings of their own boards.” 4 2 Ibid., p. 1. 3 Congressional Record, September 6, 1945, reprinted in 79th Cong., 1st sess. Joint (Congressional) Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack. Pearl Harbor Attack, 39 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Offi ce, 1946), part 1, p. 11. 4 Ibid, p. 16.

618 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

the two Hawaiian comm<strong>and</strong>ers, Admiral Kimmel <strong>and</strong> General<br />

Short, guilty <strong>of</strong> “derelictions <strong>of</strong> duty” <strong>and</strong> “errors <strong>of</strong> judgment”<br />

<strong>and</strong> they had been retired from service <strong>and</strong> demoted in rank. Th e<br />

Army <strong>and</strong> Navy reports released by Truman eff ectively absolved<br />

Kimmel <strong>and</strong> Short <strong>of</strong> blame <strong>and</strong> placed much <strong>of</strong> the responsibility<br />

on four top-level Washington <strong>of</strong>fi cials—Secretary <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Cordell Hull, Army Chief <strong>of</strong> Staff General George C. Marshall,<br />

Chief <strong>of</strong> the Army’s war plans division General Leonard T.<br />

Gerow, <strong>and</strong> Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval Operations Admiral Harold R. Stark.<br />

As the New York Times reported,<br />

It was not a pretty story that President Truman released in making<br />

public War <strong>and</strong> Navy reports on the reasons why Army <strong>and</strong><br />

Navy <strong>of</strong>fi cials at Oahu were taken by surprise in the Japanese<br />

attack on Dec. 7, 1941. 2<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> material released by Truman, the<br />

public still was not satisfi ed. Th ere were obvious omissions.<br />

Under orders <strong>of</strong> the secretary <strong>of</strong> war <strong>and</strong> the secretary <strong>of</strong> the navy,<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> both reports had been deleted. And Top Secret portions<br />

were still being withheld. In the words <strong>of</strong> Senate Majority<br />

Leader Alben Barkley, the reports were “confusing <strong>and</strong> confl icting<br />

when compared with one another, <strong>and</strong> to some extent contain<br />

contradictions <strong>and</strong> inconsistencies.” 3 Moreover, both Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

War Henry L. Stimson <strong>and</strong> Navy Secretary James Forrestal had,<br />

according to Senator Homer Ferguson, “issued critical opinions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fi ndings <strong>of</strong> their own boards.” 4<br />

2 Ibid., p. 1.<br />

3 Congressional Record, September 6, 1945, reprinted in 79th Cong., 1st sess.<br />

Joint (Congressional) Committee on the Investigation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong><br />

Attack. <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, 39 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government<br />

Printing Offi ce, 1946), part 1, p. 11.<br />

4 Ibid, p. 16.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!