Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Administration Directed Supplementary Investigations 587 he was Acting Secretary in the absence of Mr. Knox who had fl own to Hawaii. 61 Th is is likely because, according to Forrestal’s schedule of appointments, he saw both Kramer and McCollum on December 10, 1941. 62 Many argue that the reason no copies of a “Winds Execute” have been found in the fi les is because Tokyo did not send one. It may also be, as Kramer informed Saff ord on another occasion, that no written copy was furnished the Army and no written copy was distributed in the Navy Department in the customary manner because Admiral Noyes had given specifi c orders not to do so and that he would handle dissemination of this message himself. 63 Saff ord told Hewitt that he had heard through Friedman, cryptanalyst, that “written copies of the ‘winds’ message had been destroyed in the War Department by then Colonel Bissell on the direct orders of General Marshall.” 64 William F. Friedman, Chief Cryptanalyst, had been responsible, with his team in the Army cryptoanalytic bureau, 65 for having deciphered after 18–20 months of hard concentration, the purple (diplomatic) code in August 1940. Friedman testifi ed before Hewitt on June 22, 1945: 61 Ibid. Captain Saff ord indicated that . . . there had been a “winds” execute message; that no copies of it were to be found in the Navy fi les, and that nevertheless there had been testimony to 62 Forrestal’s appointment records (Princeton University Library). 63 Joint Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack, part 36, p. 72, Saff ord testimony. 64 Ibid., p. 70. 65 Ibid., part 34, pp. 84–85.

588 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy the eff ect that it had been intercepted. His story was that it was intercepted by one of their East Coast stations, he believed, and was promptly forwarded into Washington. . . .[H]e [Saff ord] indicated that it not only had the affi rmative for break in relations between Japan and the United States, but it also had a negative for a break in relations between Japan and Russia. 66 Friedman then said he had had a conversation about a year and a half ago with Colonel Sadtler who had indicated that the “winds” code execute message had come in some time on the 4th or 5th of December . . . that he hadn’t himself seen a copy, but that he had been told by somebody that the copies had been ordered or directed to be destroyed by General Marshall. (Italics added) Friedman said he had “regarded this as merely hearsay evidence and nothing more than that; highly inconceivable. . . . I probably just passed that [story] out [to Saff ord] as one of those crazy things that get started.” Friedman said he shouldn’t have done it; he “certainly had no idea that he [Saff ord] would repeat it.” 67 As a result of this June 22, 1945, testimony by Friedman, the Clarke investigation was later re-opened to investigate the charges. Hewitt was interested also in the delivery of the “One p.m. Message.” Th e 14th part of the Japanese reply was coming in when McCollum arrived at his offi ce early Sunday morning, December 7. While he and Wilkinson were discussing the situation with Stark, about 8:30 to 9:00, the dispatch directing the Japanese ambassadors to deliver their reply to Hull at precisely 1 p.m. was brought in. Stark immediately called the White House. 66 Ibid., part 36, pp. 305–06 (Hewitt). 67 Ibid.

Administration Directed Supplementary Investigations 587<br />

he was Acting Secretary in the absence <strong>of</strong> Mr. Knox who had<br />

fl own to Hawaii. 61<br />

Th is is likely because, according to Forrestal’s schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

appointments, he saw both Kramer <strong>and</strong> McCollum on December<br />

10, 1941. 62<br />

Many argue that the reason no copies <strong>of</strong> a “Winds Execute”<br />

have been found in the fi les is because Tokyo did not send one.<br />

It may also be, as Kramer informed Saff ord on another occasion,<br />

that<br />

no written copy was furnished the Army <strong>and</strong> no written copy<br />

was distributed in the Navy Department in the customary<br />

manner because Admiral Noyes had given specifi c orders not<br />

to do so <strong>and</strong> that he would h<strong>and</strong>le dissemination <strong>of</strong> this message<br />

himself. 63<br />

Saff ord told Hewitt that he had heard through Friedman,<br />

cryptanalyst, that “written copies <strong>of</strong> the ‘winds’ message had been<br />

destroyed in the War Department by then Colonel Bissell on the<br />

direct orders <strong>of</strong> General Marshall.” 64<br />

William F. Friedman, Chief Cryptanalyst, had been responsible,<br />

with his team in the Army cryptoanalytic bureau, 65 for having<br />

deciphered after 18–20 months <strong>of</strong> hard concentration, the purple<br />

(diplomatic) code in August 1940. Friedman testifi ed before<br />

Hewitt on June 22, 1945:<br />

61 Ibid.<br />

Captain Saff ord indicated that . . . there had been a “winds”<br />

execute message; that no copies <strong>of</strong> it were to be found in the<br />

Navy fi les, <strong>and</strong> that nevertheless there had been testimony to<br />

62 Forrestal’s appointment records (Princeton University Library).<br />

63 Joint Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, part 36, p. 72, Saff ord testimony.<br />

64 Ibid., p. 70.<br />

65 Ibid., part 34, pp. 84–85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!