01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

586 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

the fi les, <strong>and</strong> that he had been unable to locate any copies <strong>of</strong> it<br />

at all. 58 Saff ord couldn’t underst<strong>and</strong> what could have happened<br />

to them. When Kramer testifi ed before the NCI in Hawaii during<br />

the summer <strong>of</strong> 1944, he had not hesitated to say that the<br />

“Winds Execute” had been received <strong>and</strong> that it referred to the<br />

United States as well as to Great Britain. But a year later, before<br />

the Hewitt inquiry, he was “less positive <strong>of</strong> that now.” Kramer did<br />

“recall defi nitely being shown such a message by the GY watch<br />

<strong>of</strong>fi cer <strong>and</strong> walking down with him to Saff ord’s <strong>of</strong>fi ce <strong>and</strong> being<br />

present while the GY watch <strong>of</strong>fi cer turned it over to him.” A<br />

brief conversation ensued <strong>and</strong> then Saff ord had taken the message,<br />

Kramer assumed, to Noyes. And that was the last Kramer<br />

saw <strong>of</strong> it. He did not recall the precise wording <strong>of</strong> that message.<br />

He had “a rather sharp recollection in the latter part <strong>of</strong> that week<br />

[December 1–7, 1941] <strong>of</strong> feeling there was still no overt mention<br />

or specifi c mention <strong>of</strong> the United States in any <strong>of</strong> this traffi c.” His<br />

recollection was no longer clear; he was “under the impression<br />

that the message referred to Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> possibly the Dutch<br />

rather than the United States, although it may have referred to<br />

the United States, too.” 59<br />

If a “Winds Execute” was received, as Saff ord claimed, he was<br />

under the impression that it had been turned over to the Roberts<br />

Commission. 60 But “within the past month” Kramer had told<br />

Saff ord<br />

that a copy <strong>of</strong> the “winds” message <strong>and</strong> other papers relative to<br />

the break in diplomatic relations with Japan were not turned<br />

over to the Roberts Commission but were given to Assistant<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Navy Forrestal about 9 December 1941 while<br />

58Ibid., pp. 68–77.<br />

59Ibid., p. 81.<br />

60Ibid., p.71.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!