01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

520 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

Marshall continued:<br />

Th e information that we obtained from the Japanese actions<br />

in China, <strong>and</strong> particularly as they approached Indo-China, as<br />

well as from our most secret sources, pointed to an evident<br />

intention to move into Th ail<strong>and</strong>. . . . It seemed to us that they<br />

were defi nitely going to take some action to cut the Burma<br />

Road, possibly closing the port <strong>of</strong> Rangoon. It seemed evident<br />

to us that Malaysia—the Malay-Kra Peninsula—was very definitely<br />

threatened. It was plainly evident to us that they were<br />

accumulating supplies to go into Indo-China, <strong>and</strong> apparently<br />

were going into Th ail<strong>and</strong>. We had no specifi c indications . . .<br />

<strong>of</strong> their intentions regarding the Philippines other than those<br />

which automatically suggested themselves to us geographically.<br />

. . . [W]e had reports <strong>of</strong> movements <strong>of</strong> convoys down the coast<br />

<strong>of</strong> Indo-China.<br />

Marshall recalled “no indication <strong>of</strong> any Japanese plans in preparation<br />

for an assault on Hawaii.” 101<br />

With respect to the intercepts, Marshall did not recall the<br />

Tokyo message setting November 29, 1941, as the deadline by<br />

which the Japanese ambassadors should complete their negotiations<br />

with the United States, although he was “reasonably certain”<br />

that he had seen or been informed about it. 102 He had a “very<br />

dim recollection” <strong>of</strong> the “Winds Code” setup intercept, but didn’t<br />

recall any information about any part <strong>of</strong> the “Winds Code” having<br />

been put into eff ect. 103<br />

Marshall had “no defi nite recollection” <strong>of</strong> being on the alert,<br />

expecting a Japanese reply to Hull’s November 26 note to the<br />

Japanese. 104 Asked whether, on Saturday, December 6, he had been<br />

“acquainted with the fact that Japan had sent to her ambassadors<br />

101Ibid., p. 561.<br />

102Ibid., part 33, p. 820.<br />

103Ibid., pp. 821–22.<br />

104Ibid., p. 821.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!