01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

506 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

men <strong>and</strong> equipment to carry out the kind <strong>of</strong> continual long-range<br />

surveillance that would have been required to guard against a surprise<br />

attack.<br />

Naval Court <strong>of</strong> Inquiry Gains Access<br />

to Japanese Intercepts<br />

Finally on August 28, the 20th day <strong>of</strong> the inquiry, Kimmel’s<br />

eff orts to have the Japanese intercepts introduced bore fruit.<br />

Biesemeier introduced 40 or 50 items selected from among the<br />

secret Japanese “Purple” intercepts known as MAGIC received<br />

from November 26 to December 7, 1941. 49 Th e intercepts were<br />

not actually entered into the text <strong>of</strong> the hearings, but would be<br />

available to the court for reference. Th ey were “extracted from the<br />

record <strong>and</strong> deposited with the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Navy . . . in the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> national security <strong>and</strong> the successful prosecution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

war.” 50<br />

Stark objected strenuously:<br />

Should the secret classifi cation <strong>of</strong> the proceedings <strong>of</strong> this court<br />

be removed, or should a copy <strong>of</strong> those proceedings or information<br />

gained therefrom come into the possession <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

unfriendly to this country while the present war with Japan<br />

is still in progress, these certain questions . . . might suggest<br />

enough to the enemy to be defi nitely injurious to our present<br />

<strong>and</strong> continuing war eff ort. . . . [I]n due time,<br />

he said, “proceedings <strong>of</strong> this court <strong>and</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the evidence it might<br />

have secured will be a matter <strong>of</strong> open record available to the<br />

public.” Th erefore, “as a responsible naval <strong>of</strong>fi cer <strong>and</strong> as a former<br />

Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval Operations with knowledge <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the intelligence<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> my subordinates,” Stark urged that<br />

49Ibid., part 33, pp. 735, 767–69.<br />

50Ibid., part 32, p. 521.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!