Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24–October 19, 1944) 501 Kimmel was asked about the last-minute December 7 Marshall-Stark dispatch stating that the Japanese ambassadors “were presenting at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard time today what amounts to an ultimatum.” Marshall had closed this dispatch by saying, “Just what signifi cance the hour set may have we do not know but be on alert accordingly.” 32 Th is message did not reach Short and Kimmel until well after the attack. Devastated by the disaster, Kimmel had told the courier then that “it wasn’t of the slightest interest to me at that time, and I threw the thing in the waste basket.” 33 Asked what diff erence it would have made had he received the warning before the attack, Kimmel said two other factors were more signifi cant. “One was that an ultimatum was being delivered. Th e other was that . . . the Japanese Ambassador had instructions from his government to deliver it at a specifi c time.” 34 Kimmel had been under orders “to permit Japan to commit the fi rst overt act.” Technically, Kimmel said, I could not fi re a shot at a Japanese Fleet until after they had fi rst shot at us, and also, technically, had I sent out patrol planes armed, I would have had to wait until the enemy fi red at these patrol planes or committed some other overt act before I could do anything more than protest. 35 Th e war-warning dispatch had given Kimmel “an excuse to do something that I had wanted to do for several months . . . to bomb submarine contacts.” 36 Kimmel considered his orders confusing. Just the day before the “war warning,” Stark had advised him that the Army had 32Ibid., part 33, p. 1282. 33Ibid., part 32, p. 253. 34Ibid., p. 264. 35Ibid., p. 254. 36Ibid., p. 259.

502 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy “agreed to station 25 Army pursuit planes at Midway and a similar number at Wake.” 37 Short had received a War Department message along the same line, asking him “to relieve the marine infantry units on the outlying islands with Army personnel.” 38 Th e “proximity of these two messages in point of time to the war warning message . . . lessened the force of the war warning message.” Apparently, Kimmel said, CNO Stark was “willing to temporarily upset, to a considerable degree, the defenses of Pearl Harbor as well as of the outlying bases” to reinforce Wake and Midway, especially as the Navy was being asked to transport the planes, ground crews, essential spare parts, tools, and ammunition. Now, Kimmel said, “the diffi culties of reinforcing the outlying stations were undoubtedly well-known to the Chief of Naval Operations,” so that the War Department’s message “indicated a confl ict betwixt the ideas of the War Department and the Navy Department at that time.” Pearl Harbor, U.S. Fleet’s Base, Vulnerable to Attack Th e NCI questioned Admiral James O. Richardson, Kimmel’s predecessor as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Fleet at Pearl Harbor. Richardson’s testimony revealed that he had also encountered diffi culties in obtaining men and materiel, in conducting reconnaissance, and in acquiring reliable information to guide him in planning, training, and preparing for defense. 39 Richardson had also objected to basing the fl eet at Pearl Harbor and had recommended that it be headquartered on the West Coast, “except a 37 Ibid., part 33, p. 1177. 38 Ibid., part 32, p. 238. 39 Ibid., pp. 624, 629.

502 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

“agreed to station 25 Army pursuit planes at Midway <strong>and</strong> a similar<br />

number at Wake.” 37 Short had received a War Department<br />

message along the same line, asking him “to relieve the marine<br />

infantry units on the outlying isl<strong>and</strong>s with Army personnel.” 38<br />

Th e “proximity <strong>of</strong> these two messages in point <strong>of</strong> time to the<br />

war warning message . . . lessened the force <strong>of</strong> the war warning<br />

message.” Apparently, Kimmel said, CNO Stark was “willing to<br />

temporarily upset, to a considerable degree, the defenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pearl</strong><br />

<strong>Harbor</strong> as well as <strong>of</strong> the outlying bases” to reinforce Wake <strong>and</strong><br />

Midway, especially as the Navy was being asked to transport the<br />

planes, ground crews, essential spare parts, tools, <strong>and</strong> ammunition.<br />

Now, Kimmel said, “the diffi culties <strong>of</strong> reinforcing the outlying<br />

stations were undoubtedly well-known to the Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval<br />

Operations,” so that the War Department’s message “indicated a<br />

confl ict betwixt the ideas <strong>of</strong> the War Department <strong>and</strong> the Navy<br />

Department at that time.”<br />

<strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>, U.S. Fleet’s Base,<br />

Vulnerable to Attack<br />

Th e NCI questioned Admiral James O. Richardson, Kimmel’s<br />

predecessor as comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-chief <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Fleet at <strong>Pearl</strong><br />

<strong>Harbor</strong>. Richardson’s testimony revealed that he had also encountered<br />

diffi culties in obtaining men <strong>and</strong> materiel, in conducting<br />

reconnaissance, <strong>and</strong> in acquiring reliable information to guide<br />

him in planning, training, <strong>and</strong> preparing for defense. 39 Richardson<br />

had also objected to basing the fl eet at <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> <strong>and</strong> had recommended<br />

that it be headquartered on the West Coast, “except a<br />

37 Ibid., part 33, p. 1177.<br />

38 Ibid., part 32, p. 238.<br />

39 Ibid., pp. 624, 629.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!