Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...
Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...
The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24–October 19, 1944) 501 Kimmel was asked about the last-minute December 7 Marshall-Stark dispatch stating that the Japanese ambassadors “were presenting at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard time today what amounts to an ultimatum.” Marshall had closed this dispatch by saying, “Just what signifi cance the hour set may have we do not know but be on alert accordingly.” 32 Th is message did not reach Short and Kimmel until well after the attack. Devastated by the disaster, Kimmel had told the courier then that “it wasn’t of the slightest interest to me at that time, and I threw the thing in the waste basket.” 33 Asked what diff erence it would have made had he received the warning before the attack, Kimmel said two other factors were more signifi cant. “One was that an ultimatum was being delivered. Th e other was that . . . the Japanese Ambassador had instructions from his government to deliver it at a specifi c time.” 34 Kimmel had been under orders “to permit Japan to commit the fi rst overt act.” Technically, Kimmel said, I could not fi re a shot at a Japanese Fleet until after they had fi rst shot at us, and also, technically, had I sent out patrol planes armed, I would have had to wait until the enemy fi red at these patrol planes or committed some other overt act before I could do anything more than protest. 35 Th e war-warning dispatch had given Kimmel “an excuse to do something that I had wanted to do for several months . . . to bomb submarine contacts.” 36 Kimmel considered his orders confusing. Just the day before the “war warning,” Stark had advised him that the Army had 32Ibid., part 33, p. 1282. 33Ibid., part 32, p. 253. 34Ibid., p. 264. 35Ibid., p. 254. 36Ibid., p. 259.
502 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy “agreed to station 25 Army pursuit planes at Midway and a similar number at Wake.” 37 Short had received a War Department message along the same line, asking him “to relieve the marine infantry units on the outlying islands with Army personnel.” 38 Th e “proximity of these two messages in point of time to the war warning message . . . lessened the force of the war warning message.” Apparently, Kimmel said, CNO Stark was “willing to temporarily upset, to a considerable degree, the defenses of Pearl Harbor as well as of the outlying bases” to reinforce Wake and Midway, especially as the Navy was being asked to transport the planes, ground crews, essential spare parts, tools, and ammunition. Now, Kimmel said, “the diffi culties of reinforcing the outlying stations were undoubtedly well-known to the Chief of Naval Operations,” so that the War Department’s message “indicated a confl ict betwixt the ideas of the War Department and the Navy Department at that time.” Pearl Harbor, U.S. Fleet’s Base, Vulnerable to Attack Th e NCI questioned Admiral James O. Richardson, Kimmel’s predecessor as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Fleet at Pearl Harbor. Richardson’s testimony revealed that he had also encountered diffi culties in obtaining men and materiel, in conducting reconnaissance, and in acquiring reliable information to guide him in planning, training, and preparing for defense. 39 Richardson had also objected to basing the fl eet at Pearl Harbor and had recommended that it be headquartered on the West Coast, “except a 37 Ibid., part 33, p. 1177. 38 Ibid., part 32, p. 238. 39 Ibid., pp. 624, 629.
- Page 474 and 475: Army Pearl Harbor Board 451 been so
- Page 476 and 477: Army Pearl Harbor Board 453 Grunert
- Page 478 and 479: Army Pearl Harbor Board 455 view of
- Page 480 and 481: Army Pearl Harbor Board 457 positio
- Page 482 and 483: Army Pearl Harbor Board 459 then di
- Page 484 and 485: Army Pearl Harbor Board 461 of furt
- Page 486 and 487: Army Pearl Harbor Board 463 And he
- Page 488 and 489: Army Pearl Harbor Board 465 (2) Wha
- Page 490 and 491: Army Pearl Harbor Board 467 they co
- Page 492 and 493: Army Pearl Harbor Board 469 However
- Page 494 and 495: Army Pearl Harbor Board 471 Saturda
- Page 496 and 497: Army Pearl Harbor Board 473 the pre
- Page 498 and 499: Army Pearl Harbor Board 475 APHB me
- Page 500 and 501: Army Pearl Harbor Board 477 they ha
- Page 502 and 503: Army Pearl Harbor Board 479 By “t
- Page 504 and 505: Army Pearl Harbor Board 481 Marshal
- Page 506 and 507: Army Pearl Harbor Board 483 of the
- Page 508 and 509: Army Pearl Harbor Board 485 Departm
- Page 510 and 511: Army Pearl Harbor Board 487 clock o
- Page 512 and 513: Army Pearl Harbor Board 489 the Chi
- Page 514 and 515: Army Pearl Harbor Board 491 so crit
- Page 516 and 517: 493 23. The Navy Court of Inquiry (
- Page 518 and 519: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 520 and 521: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 522 and 523: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 526 and 527: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 528 and 529: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 530 and 531: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 532 and 533: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 534 and 535: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 536 and 537: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 538 and 539: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 540 and 541: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 542 and 543: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 544 and 545: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 546 and 547: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 548 and 549: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 550 and 551: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 552 and 553: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 554 and 555: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 556 and 557: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 558 and 559: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 560 and 561: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 562 and 563: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 564 and 565: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 566 and 567: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 568 and 569: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 570: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 573 and 574: 550 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
502 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />
“agreed to station 25 Army pursuit planes at Midway <strong>and</strong> a similar<br />
number at Wake.” 37 Short had received a War Department<br />
message along the same line, asking him “to relieve the marine<br />
infantry units on the outlying isl<strong>and</strong>s with Army personnel.” 38<br />
Th e “proximity <strong>of</strong> these two messages in point <strong>of</strong> time to the<br />
war warning message . . . lessened the force <strong>of</strong> the war warning<br />
message.” Apparently, Kimmel said, CNO Stark was “willing to<br />
temporarily upset, to a considerable degree, the defenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pearl</strong><br />
<strong>Harbor</strong> as well as <strong>of</strong> the outlying bases” to reinforce Wake <strong>and</strong><br />
Midway, especially as the Navy was being asked to transport the<br />
planes, ground crews, essential spare parts, tools, <strong>and</strong> ammunition.<br />
Now, Kimmel said, “the diffi culties <strong>of</strong> reinforcing the outlying<br />
stations were undoubtedly well-known to the Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval<br />
Operations,” so that the War Department’s message “indicated a<br />
confl ict betwixt the ideas <strong>of</strong> the War Department <strong>and</strong> the Navy<br />
Department at that time.”<br />
<strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>, U.S. Fleet’s Base,<br />
Vulnerable to Attack<br />
Th e NCI questioned Admiral James O. Richardson, Kimmel’s<br />
predecessor as comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-chief <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Fleet at <strong>Pearl</strong><br />
<strong>Harbor</strong>. Richardson’s testimony revealed that he had also encountered<br />
diffi culties in obtaining men <strong>and</strong> materiel, in conducting<br />
reconnaissance, <strong>and</strong> in acquiring reliable information to guide<br />
him in planning, training, <strong>and</strong> preparing for defense. 39 Richardson<br />
had also objected to basing the fl eet at <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> <strong>and</strong> had recommended<br />
that it be headquartered on the West Coast, “except a<br />
37 Ibid., part 33, p. 1177.<br />
38 Ibid., part 32, p. 238.<br />
39 Ibid., pp. 624, 629.