01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

494 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

witnesses. Th e court began by exploring the situation at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> the attack <strong>and</strong> thus covered much <strong>of</strong> the same territory as had<br />

the Roberts <strong>and</strong> Hart investigations.<br />

Th e jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the NCI was not limited to investigating<br />

Navy personnel only; it was to inquire “into all circumstances<br />

connected with the attack made by Japanese armed forces on<br />

<strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>” (italics added). Moreover, as Captain L.F. Saff ord<br />

had located the Japanese intercepts <strong>and</strong> had had copies replaced<br />

in the fi les by the summer <strong>of</strong> 1944, these intercepts were available<br />

to be introduced to the NCI. Kimmel was determined that they<br />

be made a part <strong>of</strong> the record. But obtaining NCI access to them<br />

would not be easy.<br />

Japanese Intercepts Located<br />

Kimmel brought the subject <strong>of</strong> the intercepts up at his fi rst<br />

opportunity. He said he had been “br<strong>and</strong>ed throughout this country<br />

as the one responsible for the <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> disaster.” He was<br />

anxious that “this investigation should go far enough to disclose<br />

all the facts in connection with the matter;” it should call “witnesses<br />

from the Army, from the State Department, or from any<br />

other federal department” in order to establish “the facts that are<br />

necessary . . . to refute the utterly false <strong>and</strong> misleading statements<br />

made throughout the Roberts Commission.” 5 Unless the intercepts<br />

were introduced, Kimmel maintained, it would be impossible<br />

to properly assign responsibility for the disaster.<br />

Judge Advocate Biesemeier asked Forrestal on August 1<br />

for access to the Japanese intercepts. No answer. On August 4<br />

Biesemeier was told that the letter had been “misplaced.” Th en<br />

apparently it was found <strong>and</strong> returned to Biesemeier with a<br />

request for “a change in its classifi cation—from SECRET to<br />

5 Ibid., p. 19.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!