Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Army Pearl Harbor Board 479 By “this other stuff ,” Saff ord meant “the declaration of war,” i.e., the 14-part reply to our “ultimatum” that the Japanese sent December 6–7, and their December 7 “One p.m. Message.” Th at, Saff ord said, “is in their [high-class, “purple”] machine which they think no one can read, and they are still talking their fool heads off in it, particularly from Germany.” 141 Even though the “Winds Execute” had been sent in the “low-grade” cipher, Saff ord said it was extremely signifi cant. By announcing the imminence of a break in relations, or of an outbreak of war, with the United States and Britain, Japan was explaining the reason for her November 25 deadline, later changed to November 29. And the deadline showed that the break in relations it portended was not just talk. Th us the “Winds Execute” “made the deadline message mean a lot more, and the deadline message made that [the Winds Code Execute] mean a lot more.” 142 Saff ord told the APHB that we knew from Japanese intercepts picked up December 1 and 3, 1941 that Japanese embassies and consulates in London, Hong Kong, Singapore, Manila, Batavia, and Washington had been told to destroy their codes, ciphers, and code machines. “[T]his destruction of codes immediately threw the ‘Winds’ message into prominence,” Saff ord said. 141 Ibid. Before, we couldn’t understand why they had this [“Winds Code”] setup arranged. It seemed a foolish thing to do . . . but they had this in mind, I think: Well, all right, one step short of war. Th ey are destroying their codes to play safe, but they are still reserving the decision as to peace or war to come in the “Winds” message, which was the reason that, from the fi rst on, we thought the “Winds” message was so highly important, and yet that information did not get out to either 142 Ibid., p. 2370.

480 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy Commander-in-Chief Pacifi c Fleet or Commander-in-Chief Asiatic Fleet until 48 hours after we had the news. 143 Saff ord had recognized the signifi cance of the “Winds Code Execute” at the time. However, his responsibilities were limited to communications security. “Th e evaluation [of a message] was out of my hands, and that is a function of Naval Intelligence.” 144 Th us, Saff ord had focused his December 4 messages to the naval attachés necessarily on the issue of security. Grunert then turned to another subject. Saff ord had “indicated . . . that at sometime in the not too distant past it was not intended to give the Navy Court of Inquiry and the Army Board certain secret information.” Had special instructions been issued to that eff ect? Th at was “rather a long story,” Saff ord said. He explained that Kimmel had asked to see the Hart report. On the basis of information revealed there, Kimmel had requested permission for his counsel, Captain Lavender, “to inspect all the fi les out at 20G, communications intelligence fi les, to see what information had been in existence in the Navy Department.” Lavender had been permitted to see the fi les and had then asked for copies of about 60 messages. Th e department had assembled the intercepts, turned them over to the director of naval communications, and notifi ed S.I.S. S.I.S. had protested. Th e assistant secretary of the Navy, Ralph A. Bard, had also disapproved of their release. But when Navy Secretary Forrestal, then in London, returned to Washington, he reversed that decision and directed that the intercepts be made available to the NCI. But the APHB had not obtained copies. Saff ord suggested they put in a request to the secretary of the Navy. 145 143Ibid., pp. 2396–97. 144Ibid., p. 2379. 145Ibid., p. 2375.

480 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

Comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-Chief Pacifi c Fleet or Comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-Chief<br />

Asiatic Fleet until 48 hours after we had the news. 143<br />

Saff ord had recognized the signifi cance <strong>of</strong> the “Winds Code<br />

Execute” at the time. However, his responsibilities were limited<br />

to communications security. “Th e evaluation [<strong>of</strong> a message] was<br />

out <strong>of</strong> my h<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> that is a function <strong>of</strong> Naval Intelligence.” 144<br />

Th us, Saff ord had focused his December 4 messages to the naval<br />

attachés necessarily on the issue <strong>of</strong> security.<br />

Grunert then turned to another subject. Saff ord had “indicated<br />

. . . that at sometime in the not too distant past it was not<br />

intended to give the Navy Court <strong>of</strong> Inquiry <strong>and</strong> the Army Board<br />

certain secret information.” Had special instructions been issued<br />

to that eff ect?<br />

Th at was “rather a long story,” Saff ord said. He explained<br />

that Kimmel had asked to see the Hart report. On the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

information revealed there, Kimmel had requested permission<br />

for his counsel, Captain Lavender, “to inspect all the fi les out at<br />

20G, communications intelligence fi les, to see what information<br />

had been in existence in the Navy Department.” Lavender had<br />

been permitted to see the fi les <strong>and</strong> had then asked for copies<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 60 messages. Th e department had assembled the intercepts,<br />

turned them over to the director <strong>of</strong> naval communications,<br />

<strong>and</strong> notifi ed S.I.S. S.I.S. had protested. Th e assistant secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

the Navy, Ralph A. Bard, had also disapproved <strong>of</strong> their release.<br />

But when Navy Secretary Forrestal, then in London, returned<br />

to Washington, he reversed that decision <strong>and</strong> directed that the<br />

intercepts be made available to the NCI. But the APHB had not<br />

obtained copies. Saff ord suggested they put in a request to the<br />

secretary <strong>of</strong> the Navy. 145<br />

143Ibid., pp. 2396–97.<br />

144Ibid., p. 2379.<br />

145Ibid., p. 2375.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!