Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...
Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...
Army Pearl Harbor Board 475 APHB members Russell and Grunert then asked Bratton how it would aff ect the Japanese if they learned then—1944— that we had intercepted a “Winds Execute” message in 1941. He did not believe those code words were being used by the Japanese today. He was then asked if the Japanese knew we had intercepted these messages and had broken that code before the war, would it give them any information as to whether or not we had broken the code they are using today. Bratton: Oh, yes, sir, it would, because these code phrases are a code within a cipher. . . . Th e whole message about this “Winds” signal was in a very secret cipher. . . . Grunert: And they are continung to use that cipher? . . . Th erefore, the danger that any leak of this thing might aff ect the war eff ort exists now as it has in the past? Bratton: Yes, sir. 130 On this point, Navy Captain Saff ord fl atly disagreed, as the APHB soon learned. Captain L.F. Safford Describes the Japanese “Winds Code” Intercepts As head of the communications security division, naval operations, in 1941, Saff ord had been much involved with naval intelligence information. 131 He remembered many details from 1941. However, when testifying before the APHB on October 2, he consulted a record of the intercepts prepared more recently (November–December 1943 and January–March 1944) from original sources borrowed from OP20G, i.e., “the communication intelligence section, or communication division, of Naval 130 Ibid., pp. 2340–41. 131 Ibid., pp. 2361–400.
476 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy Operations.” 132 Russell asked Saff ord about his statement before Hart’s investigation that we had received on November 26 “specifi c evidence of Japan’s intentions to wage an off ensive war against both Britain and the United States.” Saff ord replied that this message, S.I.S. No. 25392, said that Japan would announce her intentions in regard to war or possibly breaking off diplomatic relations with Russia, England including the Netherlands East Indies, and the United States by means of a word sent fi ve times in the middle and at the end of their information broadcast. Saff ord continued, “On November 28th, 1941, we read another message . . . giving a ‘Winds’ code to be used in their voice broadcasts.” 133 We had verifi cation of this “Winds Code” setup from other sources—Hart (Manila), Singapore, Batavia (NEI), and our intercept station in the state of Washington. 134 Russell: [T]ell us about the follow-up on this code . . . whether or not on or about December 4th you did receive information which indicated that the Japanese Empire had employed this code and the intercepted messages indicated fi nal decisions aff ecting the United States, Russia, Britain; one or more of these powers. Saff ord: Yes, sir, we did. Th at was received in the morning of Th ursday, December 4, 1941. It was received about 8:00. . . by teletype. I saw it when I fi rst came to the offi ce . . . the writing at the bottom in lead pencil in Kramer’s handwriting, “War with England, war with America, peace with Russia.” Th e message as received was not the way we expected it, because 132 Ibid., pp. 2362, 2367. 133 Ibid., pp. 2367–68. 134 Ibid., pp. 2368–71.
- Page 447 and 448: 424 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 449 and 450: 426 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 451 and 452: 428 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 453 and 454: 430 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 455 and 456: 432 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 457 and 458: 434 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 459 and 460: 436 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 461 and 462: 438 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fru
- Page 464 and 465: 441 22. Army Pearl Harbor Board The
- Page 466 and 467: Army Pearl Harbor Board 443 attack
- Page 468 and 469: Army Pearl Harbor Board 445 the Haw
- Page 470 and 471: Army Pearl Harbor Board 447 interpr
- Page 472 and 473: Army Pearl Harbor Board 449 a grave
- Page 474 and 475: Army Pearl Harbor Board 451 been so
- Page 476 and 477: Army Pearl Harbor Board 453 Grunert
- Page 478 and 479: Army Pearl Harbor Board 455 view of
- Page 480 and 481: Army Pearl Harbor Board 457 positio
- Page 482 and 483: Army Pearl Harbor Board 459 then di
- Page 484 and 485: Army Pearl Harbor Board 461 of furt
- Page 486 and 487: Army Pearl Harbor Board 463 And he
- Page 488 and 489: Army Pearl Harbor Board 465 (2) Wha
- Page 490 and 491: Army Pearl Harbor Board 467 they co
- Page 492 and 493: Army Pearl Harbor Board 469 However
- Page 494 and 495: Army Pearl Harbor Board 471 Saturda
- Page 496 and 497: Army Pearl Harbor Board 473 the pre
- Page 500 and 501: Army Pearl Harbor Board 477 they ha
- Page 502 and 503: Army Pearl Harbor Board 479 By “t
- Page 504 and 505: Army Pearl Harbor Board 481 Marshal
- Page 506 and 507: Army Pearl Harbor Board 483 of the
- Page 508 and 509: Army Pearl Harbor Board 485 Departm
- Page 510 and 511: Army Pearl Harbor Board 487 clock o
- Page 512 and 513: Army Pearl Harbor Board 489 the Chi
- Page 514 and 515: Army Pearl Harbor Board 491 so crit
- Page 516 and 517: 493 23. The Navy Court of Inquiry (
- Page 518 and 519: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 520 and 521: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 522 and 523: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 524 and 525: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 526 and 527: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 528 and 529: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 530 and 531: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 532 and 533: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 534 and 535: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 536 and 537: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 538 and 539: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 540 and 541: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 542 and 543: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 544 and 545: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
- Page 546 and 547: The Navy Court of Inquiry (July 24-
476 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />
Operations.” 132 Russell asked Saff ord about his statement before<br />
Hart’s investigation that we had received on November 26 “specifi<br />
c evidence <strong>of</strong> Japan’s intentions to wage an <strong>of</strong>f ensive war<br />
against both Britain <strong>and</strong> the United States.” Saff ord replied that<br />
this message, S.I.S. No. 25392,<br />
said that Japan would announce her intentions in regard to<br />
war or possibly breaking <strong>of</strong>f diplomatic relations with Russia,<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> including the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s East Indies, <strong>and</strong> the United<br />
States by means <strong>of</strong> a word sent fi ve times in the middle <strong>and</strong> at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> their information broadcast.<br />
Saff ord continued, “On November 28th, 1941, we read another<br />
message . . . giving a ‘Winds’ code to be used in their voice<br />
broadcasts.” 133 We had verifi cation <strong>of</strong> this “Winds Code” setup<br />
from other sources—Hart (Manila), Singapore, Batavia (NEI),<br />
<strong>and</strong> our intercept station in the state <strong>of</strong> Washington. 134<br />
Russell: [T]ell us about the follow-up on this code . . . whether<br />
or not on or about December 4th you did receive information<br />
which indicated that the Japanese Empire had employed<br />
this code <strong>and</strong> the intercepted messages indicated fi nal decisions<br />
aff ecting the United States, Russia, Britain; one or more<br />
<strong>of</strong> these powers.<br />
Saff ord: Yes, sir, we did. Th at was received in the morning <strong>of</strong><br />
Th ursday, December 4, 1941. It was received about 8:00. . . by<br />
teletype. I saw it when I fi rst came to the <strong>of</strong>fi ce . . . the writing<br />
at the bottom in lead pencil in Kramer’s h<strong>and</strong>writing, “War<br />
with Engl<strong>and</strong>, war with America, peace with Russia.” Th e<br />
message as received was not the way we expected it, because<br />
132 Ibid., pp. 2362, 2367.<br />
133 Ibid., pp. 2367–68.<br />
134 Ibid., pp. 2368–71.