Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Army Pearl Harbor Board 475 APHB members Russell and Grunert then asked Bratton how it would aff ect the Japanese if they learned then—1944— that we had intercepted a “Winds Execute” message in 1941. He did not believe those code words were being used by the Japanese today. He was then asked if the Japanese knew we had intercepted these messages and had broken that code before the war, would it give them any information as to whether or not we had broken the code they are using today. Bratton: Oh, yes, sir, it would, because these code phrases are a code within a cipher. . . . Th e whole message about this “Winds” signal was in a very secret cipher. . . . Grunert: And they are continung to use that cipher? . . . Th erefore, the danger that any leak of this thing might aff ect the war eff ort exists now as it has in the past? Bratton: Yes, sir. 130 On this point, Navy Captain Saff ord fl atly disagreed, as the APHB soon learned. Captain L.F. Safford Describes the Japanese “Winds Code” Intercepts As head of the communications security division, naval operations, in 1941, Saff ord had been much involved with naval intelligence information. 131 He remembered many details from 1941. However, when testifying before the APHB on October 2, he consulted a record of the intercepts prepared more recently (November–December 1943 and January–March 1944) from original sources borrowed from OP20G, i.e., “the communication intelligence section, or communication division, of Naval 130 Ibid., pp. 2340–41. 131 Ibid., pp. 2361–400.

476 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy Operations.” 132 Russell asked Saff ord about his statement before Hart’s investigation that we had received on November 26 “specifi c evidence of Japan’s intentions to wage an off ensive war against both Britain and the United States.” Saff ord replied that this message, S.I.S. No. 25392, said that Japan would announce her intentions in regard to war or possibly breaking off diplomatic relations with Russia, England including the Netherlands East Indies, and the United States by means of a word sent fi ve times in the middle and at the end of their information broadcast. Saff ord continued, “On November 28th, 1941, we read another message . . . giving a ‘Winds’ code to be used in their voice broadcasts.” 133 We had verifi cation of this “Winds Code” setup from other sources—Hart (Manila), Singapore, Batavia (NEI), and our intercept station in the state of Washington. 134 Russell: [T]ell us about the follow-up on this code . . . whether or not on or about December 4th you did receive information which indicated that the Japanese Empire had employed this code and the intercepted messages indicated fi nal decisions aff ecting the United States, Russia, Britain; one or more of these powers. Saff ord: Yes, sir, we did. Th at was received in the morning of Th ursday, December 4, 1941. It was received about 8:00. . . by teletype. I saw it when I fi rst came to the offi ce . . . the writing at the bottom in lead pencil in Kramer’s handwriting, “War with England, war with America, peace with Russia.” Th e message as received was not the way we expected it, because 132 Ibid., pp. 2362, 2367. 133 Ibid., pp. 2367–68. 134 Ibid., pp. 2368–71.

Army <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Board 475<br />

APHB members Russell <strong>and</strong> Grunert then asked Bratton<br />

how it would aff ect the Japanese if they learned then—1944—<br />

that we had intercepted a “Winds Execute” message in 1941. He<br />

did not believe those code words were being used by the Japanese<br />

today. He was then asked if the Japanese knew we had intercepted<br />

these messages <strong>and</strong> had broken that code before the war,<br />

would it give them any information as to whether or not we had<br />

broken the code they are using today.<br />

Bratton: Oh, yes, sir, it would, because these code phrases are a<br />

code within a cipher. . . . Th e whole message about this “Winds”<br />

signal was in a very secret cipher. . . .<br />

Grunert: And they are continung to use that cipher? . . .<br />

Th erefore, the danger that any leak <strong>of</strong> this thing might aff ect<br />

the war eff ort exists now as it has in the past?<br />

Bratton: Yes, sir. 130<br />

On this point, Navy Captain Saff ord fl atly disagreed, as the<br />

APHB soon learned.<br />

Captain L.F. Safford Describes the<br />

Japanese “Winds Code” Intercepts<br />

As head <strong>of</strong> the communications security division, naval<br />

operations, in 1941, Saff ord had been much involved with naval<br />

intelligence information. 131 He remembered many details from<br />

1941. However, when testifying before the APHB on October<br />

2, he consulted a record <strong>of</strong> the intercepts prepared more recently<br />

(November–December 1943 <strong>and</strong> January–March 1944) from<br />

original sources borrowed from OP20G, i.e., “the communication<br />

intelligence section, or communication division, <strong>of</strong> Naval<br />

130 Ibid., pp. 2340–41.<br />

131 Ibid., pp. 2361–400.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!