01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

450 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

in any direction including attack on Philippines or Guam is a<br />

possibility.<br />

Th e comm<strong>and</strong>ers were advised: “Chief <strong>of</strong> Staff has seen this dispatch<br />

concurs <strong>and</strong> requests action adees [addressees] to inform<br />

senior Army their areas.” 35 Short did not recall seeing this pessimistic<br />

Navy message. 36<br />

Marshall defended Washington’s warnings as adequate to<br />

have alerted Short to be prepared for the crisis that was coming.<br />

“In our own view,” Marshall testifi ed,<br />

an alert <strong>of</strong> the character, particularly the character <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

that occurred at that time, the Naval alert <strong>and</strong> then the later<br />

Army alert, were suffi cient for any comm<strong>and</strong>er with a great<br />

responsibility. 37<br />

Short thought that, if Washington ever really believed that an<br />

attack on the United States was imminent, it would have found<br />

some means to inform him, as comm<strong>and</strong>er in the fi eld, if necessary<br />

by scrambler phone. “[O]rdinarily, you could get through in<br />

ten or fi fteen minutes. It was reasonable to believe,” Short testifi<br />

ed, “that if there was going to be a hostile attack, they would have<br />

tried to get it to us by more than one means <strong>of</strong> communication.”<br />

Th us he had been forced to conclude that “there was a feeling<br />

still at that time that secrecy was more important than the time<br />

element.” 38 But there had been no word from Washington. Under<br />

Grunert’s questioning, Marshall admitted that it would have<br />

been both “possible <strong>and</strong> feasible to have sent the substance <strong>of</strong> this<br />

secret information to the Comm<strong>and</strong>ing Generals <strong>of</strong> the Overseas<br />

Departments by courier or otherwise.” However, Marshall had<br />

35Ibid., pp. 1328, 1405, CNO Dispatch #242005, November 24, 1941.<br />

36Ibid., part 27, p. 220.<br />

37Ibid., part 29, p. 2329.<br />

38 Ibid., p.169.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!