01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

in her struggle against Japan. And the Act prevented the United<br />

States from lending support. Out <strong>of</strong> his desire to aid China, FDR<br />

sought an end to the blanket embargo on shipping arms to belligerent<br />

nations. So in his January 4, 1939, message to Congress,<br />

he launched a campaign for the Act’s repeal: “[O]ur neutrality<br />

laws may operate unevenly <strong>and</strong> unfairly—may actually give aid<br />

to an aggressor <strong>and</strong> deny it to the victim.” 21 Congress rejected his<br />

reasoning, <strong>and</strong> on March 20 the Senate turned down Roosevelt’s<br />

proposal for repeal. FDR repeated his request. Hull also asked for<br />

its repeal.<br />

Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Far East situation diff ered from that <strong>of</strong> U.S. <strong>of</strong>fi cials. Chamberlain<br />

did not want to prevent Japan from obtaining the military supplies<br />

she needed for her campaign in China. He recognized “the<br />

actual situation in China where hostilities on a large scale are in<br />

progress” <strong>and</strong> noted that<br />

as long as that state <strong>of</strong> aff airs continues to exist, the Japanese<br />

forces in China have special requirements for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

safeguarding their own security <strong>and</strong> maintaining public order.<br />

. . . His Majesty’s Government have no intention <strong>of</strong> countenancing<br />

any acts or measures prejudicial to the attainment <strong>of</strong><br />

the above-mentioned objects by Japanese forces.<br />

Chamberlain urged that “British authorities <strong>and</strong> British<br />

nationals in China . . . refrain from such acts <strong>and</strong> measures.” 22<br />

Th e United States <strong>and</strong> Japan had been trading partners for<br />

years. A commercial treaty permitting <strong>and</strong> encouraging trade<br />

between the two countries had been in eff ect since 1911. Under its<br />

terms, if one party wanted to terminate the treaty, it was required<br />

to notify the other party six months in advance. In accordance<br />

with that provision, Hull gave the Japanese ambassador notice on<br />

21 Department <strong>of</strong> State, Peace <strong>and</strong> War, p. 49.<br />

22 U.S. Congress, Events, pp. 198–99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!