01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

inroads on China itself <strong>and</strong> possibly attack the Malay Straits.<br />

He also thought they would attack Russia at an opportune<br />

moment. Th is would have left the president with the very diffi<br />

cult problem <strong>of</strong> protecting our interests [in the Far East].<br />

He always realized that Japan would jump on us at an opportune<br />

moment <strong>and</strong> they would merely use the “one by one” technique<br />

<strong>of</strong> Germany. Hence, his great relief at the method that<br />

Japan used. In spite <strong>of</strong> the disaster at <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

blitz-warfare with the Japanese during the fi rst few weeks, it<br />

completely solidifi ed the American people <strong>and</strong> made the war<br />

upon Japan inevitable. 85<br />

* * * * *<br />

Judging from reports <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> the president’s intimate<br />

associates who saw him on December 7, after he had learned <strong>of</strong><br />

the Japanese attack, he was unquestionably more soothed than<br />

surprised by the news. He was truly fl abbergasted at the actual<br />

site <strong>of</strong> the attack, <strong>and</strong> he was shaken by the large unexpected<br />

losses to his beloved Navy. However, it came as a relief to him that<br />

Japan had not bypassed American territory to attack the British<br />

or Dutch.<br />

FDR had faced a domestic dilemma. Th e New Deal had<br />

failed to end the depression. Unemployment in 1939 was as high<br />

as when he took <strong>of</strong>fi ce in 1933. Only Selective Service <strong>and</strong> the<br />

war orders <strong>of</strong> France <strong>and</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> had succeeded in eliminating<br />

unemployment. Increased employment in the United States had<br />

been fi nanced fi rst by French <strong>and</strong> British gold <strong>and</strong> then, under<br />

lend-lease, by infl ation <strong>and</strong> increased public debt. Without such<br />

continued war production, the New Deal, on which FDR’s great<br />

popularity rested, would have been revealed as an illusion <strong>and</strong> the<br />

85Sherwood, Th e White House Papers <strong>of</strong> Harry L. Hopkins, pp. 432–33, <strong>and</strong><br />

Roosevelt <strong>and</strong> Hopkins, p. 428.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!