01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

282 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

Th e United States Navy, now in the midst <strong>of</strong> a record expansion<br />

program <strong>and</strong> recently placed on a war footing with full<br />

personnel manning the ships <strong>of</strong> three fl eets, has at this time no<br />

superior in the world. . . . On any comparable basis, the United<br />

States Navy is second to none.<br />

Knox was “proud to report that the American people may feel<br />

fully confi dent in their Navy.” In view <strong>of</strong> the uncertain international<br />

situation,<br />

Our aim must always be to have forces suffi cient to enable us to<br />

have complete freedom <strong>of</strong> action in either ocean while retaining<br />

forces in the other ocean for eff ective defense <strong>of</strong> our vital<br />

security. Anything less than this strength is hazardous to the<br />

security <strong>of</strong> the nation <strong>and</strong> must be considered as unacceptable<br />

as long as it is within our power to produce <strong>and</strong> man the forces<br />

necessary to meet these requirements.<br />

In substance, the department’s report announced that the U.S.<br />

Navy was “second to none” <strong>and</strong> that it was capable <strong>of</strong> operating<br />

in both the Atlantic <strong>and</strong> Pacifi c. Moreover, it was being further<br />

strengthened <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ed. Th us the public was assured on the<br />

morning <strong>of</strong> December 7, 1941, that the U.S. Navy constituted an<br />

eff ective <strong>and</strong> reliable arm <strong>of</strong> our national defense.<br />

Part 14 <strong>of</strong> Japan’s Reply to U.S. Note<br />

Th e 13 parts <strong>of</strong> the Japanese reply to our November 26 note,<br />

received in Washington late on Saturday, December 6, were a<br />

fairly sober review <strong>of</strong> the U.S.-Japanese negotiations to date <strong>and</strong><br />

the various points <strong>of</strong> agreement <strong>and</strong> disagreement—notably, the<br />

economic restrictions imposed on Japan, the embargo, the freezing<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets, the fact that the United States was assisting China,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the United States’s determined insistence (a) that Japan<br />

withdraw from China <strong>and</strong> (b) that she refuse to honor her mutual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!