01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

October 15, 1941, he found that it had been reduced to a factgathering<br />

agency <strong>and</strong> the Navy’s War Plans Division had assumed<br />

the responsibility for analyzing the information that came in. 2<br />

Th e Navy’s top <strong>of</strong>fi cer, the Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval Operations (CNO),<br />

was responsible for keeping the Navy’s comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-chief, the<br />

president, informed. And orders to the Navy’s fi eld comm<strong>and</strong>ers<br />

were sent out by the CNO.<br />

Step by step, as data journeyed through channels, from the<br />

technical specialists who collected it to the <strong>of</strong>fi cers with training<br />

<strong>and</strong> experience who interpreted it, it became meaningful “intelligence.”<br />

“Intelligence” formed an extremely important component<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total 1941 picture. Th e Army’s chief <strong>of</strong> staff , General<br />

Marshall, <strong>and</strong> the Chief <strong>of</strong> Naval Operations, Admiral Stark,<br />

relied on the available “intelligence” when advising their fi eld<br />

comm<strong>and</strong>ers on military strategy. Th e top administration <strong>of</strong>fi -<br />

cials, that is the secretaries <strong>of</strong> State, War, Navy, <strong>and</strong> the president<br />

himself, also strove to keep abreast <strong>of</strong> current “intelligence.” In<br />

1941, this meant keeping up to date on the Japanese position<br />

through the diplomatic cables <strong>and</strong> other sources.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> assembling, interpreting, <strong>and</strong> analyzing the<br />

data available, the most important “intelligence” was channeled<br />

to the men at the top. Even though each technical specialist<br />

involved in the complicated procedure was familiar with only a<br />

small segment <strong>of</strong> the total picture, the president <strong>and</strong> his top civilian<br />

<strong>and</strong> military advisers, who had the fi nal responsibility for the<br />

“common defense” <strong>of</strong> the nation <strong>and</strong> for resolving diplomatic <strong>and</strong><br />

political diff erences, had a bird’s-eye view <strong>of</strong> the overall situation.<br />

Th ey were also provided with the country’s most perceptive<br />

military advice. By December 6, they were well aware, as a<br />

2 79th Cong., 1st sess. Joint (Congressional) Committee on the Investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack. <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack, 39 vols. (Washington, D.C.:<br />

U.S. Government Printing Offi ce, 1946), part 36, pp. 229–31, testimony <strong>of</strong><br />

Admiral Wilkinson, June 5, 1945, before the Hewitt Inquiry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!