01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

250 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

Many persons, each with his or her own expertise, played<br />

a role in the process <strong>of</strong> collecting the raw data that go to provide<br />

“intelligence.” Th ere were code specialists, communications<br />

specialists, security specialists, decoders, translators, <strong>and</strong> couriers.<br />

Th ere were code clerks who listened to foreign radio broadcasts<br />

<strong>and</strong> could decipher Morse code, linguists familiar with Japanese,<br />

<strong>and</strong> radio technicians who could determine the location <strong>of</strong> naval<br />

vessels <strong>and</strong> military units by intersecting radio beacons. Th ere were<br />

others at our various stations all over the world who picked cable<br />

intercepts out <strong>of</strong> the air <strong>and</strong> transmitted them to Washington.<br />

Each was familiar with only a small part <strong>of</strong> the total picture. No<br />

single person had access to all this information. Few <strong>of</strong> the many<br />

specialists were suffi ciently aware <strong>of</strong> the broad picture to be able<br />

to comprehend the signifi cance <strong>of</strong> the data they accumulated.<br />

And no one had any reason to feel a sense <strong>of</strong> urgency because no<br />

one knew what was going to happen on December 7.<br />

Th e responsibility for collecting, analyzing, disseminating,<br />

<strong>and</strong> employing information was divided among various <strong>of</strong>fi ces<br />

<strong>and</strong> divisions <strong>of</strong> the military <strong>and</strong> the administration, each with<br />

its own specialized experts. Roughly speaking, data was collected<br />

by technical personnel in “communications.” Raw data was then<br />

integrated <strong>and</strong> analyzed by specialists in “intelligence” <strong>of</strong>fi ces or<br />

divisions, persons who had the training, experience, background,<br />

<strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> policy suffi cient to sift the wheat from the<br />

chaff , to recognize what was pertinent <strong>and</strong> what was not, to<br />

analyze <strong>and</strong> interpret it, <strong>and</strong> to decide what information should<br />

be disseminated <strong>and</strong> to whom. Th ese “intelligence” specialists<br />

needed to underst<strong>and</strong> not only military operations, the defensive<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>f ensive capabilities <strong>of</strong> our forces <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> our potential allies<br />

<strong>and</strong> enemies, but also the diplomatic situation <strong>and</strong> government<br />

policy.<br />

Once the raw data collected was converted into “intelligence,”<br />

other specialists were responsible for disseminating it <strong>and</strong> issuing<br />

comm<strong>and</strong>s to the fi eld comm<strong>and</strong>ers. Th is responsibility was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!