Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Signifi cant Information Known in Washington 223 investigation was launched to discover who had been responsible for the leak. Japanese “Winds Code” Executed: War with England; War with the U.S.; Peace with Russia On November 28, we had intercepted the November 15 Japanese “Winds Code” setup (Tokyo Circular #2353), a message announcing special weather code words to be used by the Japanese “[i]n case of emergency (danger of cutting off our diplomatic relations), and the cutting off of international communications.” 6 By introducing these weather words, each with a hidden meaning, into daily Japanese language news broadcasts, the Japanese would be able to communicate secretly to their diplomatic offi - cers throughout the world, even if they could no longer transmit via their cryptographic channels. Also on November 28, we had intercepted a Japanese message with the schedule of Japanese news broadcasts and the kilocycles on which transmissions were to be made. 7 Th e signifi cance of the “Winds Code” message became apparent when on December 1 we translated a Japanese intercept ordering the Japanese diplomatic offi ces in some countries to destroy their codes and code machines. When Captain Saff ord, director of the Security Section of Navy Department’s Communications, read the cable giving the times and frequencies of Japanese news broadcasts in conjunction with the Japanese “Winds Code” message, he put two and two together. According to him, 6 79th Cong., 1st sess. Joint (Congressional) Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack. Pearl Harbor Attack, 39 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Offi ce, 1946), part 12, p. 154, Tokyo Circular #2353. 7 Joint Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack, part 34, p. 111.

224 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy everyone in authority from the president down believed that this [a “Winds Execute”] would be the Japanese Government’s decision as to peace or war announced to their own offi cials overseas. We looked on it as “our chance of a tip-off , [our chance] to gain the necessary time to prevent a surprise attack on our fl eet.” 8 Interception of a “Winds Execute” was given top priority. Saff ord immediately alerted U.S. intercept stations to monitor Japanese-language weather and news broadcasts at the scheduled times. 9 It was expected that the message would be transmitted in Japanese Morse code. Th ose monitoring the broadcasts were given cards with the three Japanese phrases listed in the “Winds Code” message—HIGASHI NO KAZE AME, KITA NO KAZE KUMORI, and NISHI NO KAZE HARE—and were instructed to listen closely for an “Execute,” i.e., for an actual broadcast of any one of the three crucial Japanese weather phrases. 10 “Our prospects for interception looked somewhat dubious,” Saff ord said later. 11 Th e Navy even feared that “this winds execute might have been sent out before the 28th, when we began listening for it 12 and that we might have missed it entirely. After all, the Japanese message had gone out on November 15, almost two weeks before we decoded and translated it. All these uncertainties 8 Ibid., part 8, p. 3640, Saff ord testimony before the Joint Committee. 9 Ibid., p. 3580. 10 Ibid., part 33, p. 853, Kramer testimony, September 13, 1944, at Navy Court of Inquiry; ibid., part 8, pp. 3915–18, and ibid., part 9, pp. 4126–28, Kramer testimony before the Joint Committee; and ibid., part 10, p. 4624, Bratton testimony before the Joint Committee. 11 Ibid., part 8, p. 3581, Saff ord statement before the Joint Committee. 12 Ibid. p. 3640.

224 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

everyone in authority from the president down believed that<br />

this [a “Winds Execute”] would be the Japanese Government’s<br />

decision as to peace or war announced to their own <strong>of</strong>fi cials<br />

overseas.<br />

We looked on it as “our chance <strong>of</strong> a tip-<strong>of</strong>f , [our chance]<br />

to gain the necessary time to prevent a surprise attack on our<br />

fl eet.” 8<br />

Interception <strong>of</strong> a “Winds Execute” was given top priority.<br />

Saff ord immediately alerted U.S. intercept stations to monitor<br />

Japanese-language weather <strong>and</strong> news broadcasts at the scheduled<br />

times. 9 It was expected that the message would be transmitted<br />

in Japanese Morse code. Th ose monitoring the broadcasts<br />

were given cards with the three Japanese phrases listed in the<br />

“Winds Code” message—HIGASHI NO KAZE AME, KITA<br />

NO KAZE KUMORI, <strong>and</strong> NISHI NO KAZE HARE—<strong>and</strong><br />

were instructed to listen closely for an “Execute,” i.e., for an<br />

actual broadcast <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> the three crucial Japanese weather<br />

phrases. 10<br />

“Our prospects for interception looked somewhat dubious,”<br />

Saff ord said later. 11 Th e Navy even feared that “this winds execute<br />

might have been sent out before the 28th, when we began listening<br />

for it 12 <strong>and</strong> that we might have missed it entirely. After all,<br />

the Japanese message had gone out on November 15, almost two<br />

weeks before we decoded <strong>and</strong> translated it. All these uncertainties<br />

8 Ibid., part 8, p. 3640, Saff ord testimony before the Joint Committee.<br />

9 Ibid., p. 3580.<br />

10 Ibid., part 33, p. 853, Kramer testimony, September 13, 1944, at Navy Court<br />

<strong>of</strong> Inquiry; ibid., part 8, pp. 3915–18, <strong>and</strong> ibid., part 9, pp. 4126–28, Kramer<br />

testimony before the Joint Committee; <strong>and</strong> ibid., part 10, p. 4624, Bratton<br />

testimony before the Joint Committee.<br />

11 Ibid., part 8, p. 3581, Saff ord statement before the Joint Committee.<br />

12 Ibid. p. 3640.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!