ACTION PLAN - University of Ulster
ACTION PLAN - University of Ulster
ACTION PLAN - University of Ulster
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>ACTION</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
GOAL 1: Increase retention <strong>of</strong> all first-time Fall 2002 students from 58.7 percent to 59.7 percent.<br />
KEY STRATEGY G: Improve faculty morale by clearly delineating faculty and staff roles and expectations<br />
regarding retention and subsequent rewards from the top down. Centralize this message to faculty across all<br />
colleges (Dr. C<strong>of</strong>er, Dr. Richters, Dr. Pryor, Dr. Roane). This strategy is closely linked with Strategy B also<br />
in Goal 1 and includes communication with the president and provost regarding the perceived importance <strong>of</strong><br />
devising and implementing an effective strategy to “get faculty and administration on board” with the goals <strong>of</strong><br />
the university’s retention efforts.<br />
Description/Explanation: Deliberations in the Retention Committee revealed the sense that the optimal<br />
course for a successful outcome to retention efforts would be one which could accomplish generalized<br />
changes in attitudes among the faculty (and staff). It is granted that implementing such a change is a large<br />
task. The problem at hand seemed to be a problem <strong>of</strong> low morale. The committee voiced agreement that one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the biggest obstacles to be overcome was the belief by the faculty and staff that altered behaviors<br />
promoting retention would not be recognized, appreciated and/or rewarded. For example, it was generally<br />
agreed that there was no “check-box” on any annual evaluation form to indicate that any university employee<br />
had engaged in retention-promoting activities. It was further agreed that retention-friendly behavior was not a<br />
requirement for promotion or tenure. The committee agreed that it was unlikely that meaningful, sustainable<br />
changes in faculty and staff behaviors would occur without clear mechanism for rewarding or recognizing<br />
these behaviors, and correctly or not, creating, or initiating the creation <strong>of</strong> such a mechanism was the<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the upper administration <strong>of</strong> the university and to do so with the utmost spirit <strong>of</strong> cooperation<br />
and collegiality.<br />
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE/TIMETABLE<br />
Steps Responsibility Target Date /<br />
Completion Date<br />
Call the President to step up an appointment Roane February 28<br />
Meet with the President or send him a letter, or both Roane April 7<br />
Coordinator: Dr. Richters<br />
Retention Committee Contact:: Dr. David Roane<br />
Budget/Reallocation Plan: No dollars, but some time will be required.