31.12.2012 Views

Manual for Development Projects - Planning Commission

Manual for Development Projects - Planning Commission

Manual for Development Projects - Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4<br />

vi) Project Staff<br />

vii) Interest during construction, etc.<br />

(d) Unit cost has to be given separately in the appropriate column of the PC-I.<br />

Page 6 of 11<br />

(e) In case of revised cost, the reasons <strong>for</strong> increase in respect of each item as originally estimated have to be<br />

furnished. Similarly increase due to revision in the scope of the project is to be given separately in<br />

accordance with the additional sheet annexed with each sectoral PC-I.<br />

(f) In case a project has been revised <strong>for</strong> the first time either due to increase in the total cost by more than<br />

15% or due to revision in its scope, it would be treated as a new scheme <strong>for</strong> obtaining sanction of the<br />

competent authority. Any further increase thereafter is not allowed and there<strong>for</strong>e it is essential that the<br />

revised cost estimates are prepared with due care (Annexure-XI). A copy of the <strong>Planning</strong> and <strong>Development</strong><br />

Division's letter dated 12-12-1989 is also enclosed <strong>for</strong> guidance (Annexure-XII).<br />

(g) In case the PC-I provides 15% or more escalation in loan agreement of Aided <strong>Projects</strong>, the provision of<br />

15% escalation over the approved cost of the project as contained in <strong>Planning</strong> & development Division's<br />

letter dated 15-4-1989 (Annexure-XIV) shall not there<strong>for</strong>e be admissible in such cases.<br />

(h) When the need <strong>for</strong> revision of cost becomes evident due to higher bids received in response to a tender,<br />

the revised scheme based on the accepted tender cost should be submitted to the competent authority <strong>for</strong><br />

fresh approval. As regards the question as to when a revised scheme, the cost of which has exceeded more<br />

than 15% of the originally approved cost, should be prepared and submitted to the competent authority <strong>for</strong><br />

approval, it is to be noted that no difficulty should be experienced if PC-III (Quarterly Progress Report) is<br />

duly prepared. If columns 6 and 7 of the said <strong>for</strong>m indicate that the percentages of financial expenditure<br />

have exceeded the percentages of physical work by more than 15% it is enough indication that the cost of<br />

the project would go beyond the approved cost. As soon as the indication is visible, the executing agency<br />

should start work on revising the scheme and submit <strong>for</strong> the approval of competent authority (Annexure-<br />

XIII) without stopping the actual work. In the exceptional case where the revised PC-I can not be prepared<br />

in time, recourse could be had to obtaining the anticipatory approval of the Chairman, ECNEC (Annexure-<br />

XV). However, increase in the cost due to delinking of the Pakistani Rupee from the Dollar will not need<br />

fresh approval of the CDWP/ECNEC. The sponsoring agency shall however intimate the revised cost due<br />

to the depreciation of Pakistani currency to the Cabinet Division, <strong>Planning</strong> and <strong>Development</strong> Division and<br />

Finance Division (Annexure-XVI).<br />

(i) In the case of non-aided projects where the cost of the project remains within 15% of the original<br />

cost/scope, the case <strong>for</strong> extension of the execution period beyond that shown in the approved PC-I need not<br />

http://hd2/pc/popup/ch4_p.html<br />

9/23/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!