Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
nature of the child. The company of children means happiness and joy for married couples in their ample free time. The rearing of children has also been made considerably easier through the modern finished goods industry. It is all the more alarming that more and more people seem to have a disturbed relation to life, which leads to more coffins than cribs. The number of viable births per 1000 inhabitants, which in Germany amounted to 35.6 in 1900, sank to 15.5 by the year 1953 and to 10.1 in 1980. The period of natural population growth came to an end in 1972. The excess of deaths over births -and there are no signs of change in view -will dominate the scene for a long time. In 1975 the excess of deaths over births reached its highest postwar figure with 12.1 deaths per 1000 inhabitants compared with 9.7 viable births leaving the excess of deaths over births at 148748. In the year 1981, there were 97.635 more deaths in the Federal Republic of Germany than viable births. During this period unborn life was destroyed 87.535 times through pregnancy terminations in the territory of the Federal Republic. In 65466 cases, i.e. 74.8% of all recorded pregnancy terminations the pregnant women had terminations exempt from penalty, authorized because of a serious social state of need. 3. Two consequences: a) The present situation leads to a loss of social position for families with many children. The social standard of life, insofar as it is common among strata of population of equal rank, is determined by households and families that have either no children under eighteen years of age or at the most one or two. In the Federal Republic of Germany, 85.3% of all households fall into this category. The consequences for families with more children are obvious: worse living conditions, although it is precisely families with many children that need a larger and well furnished home (with bath etc.), worse clothing, worse nutrition, worse educational opportunities, and so on. One cannot object that children indeed mean an economic burden for the parents in the early years but that with increasing age they become economically useful. That is hardly true now even for the farmstead and for handicraft and merchant families. For the families of workers and employees, however, children have become 'pure cost factors' since factory work by children is illegal and children set up a household of their own as soon as they earn enough money. Since children are usually born today within the first ten years of marriage, younger families in particular are affected by the drop in the living standard. In the Federal Republic of Germany, 36.9% of women in childless marriages are gainfully employed today, so that a double income is available. But in families that have two or more small children, married women must in most cases give up their job outside the home. Although family needs rise with children, family income sinks. Need and income run counter each other. b) If this shrinking process of the family continues, the danger threatens that in a few decades the necessary social product will no longer be able to be mustered. Already today families with three or four children supply more than two thirds of the next generation, and families with two or more children 90% of the next generation. Many object that the falling birth rate is offset by higher investments and progressive automation. It is indeed correct that, with the relative decrease in the number of persons employed, efficiency and automation can make possible a growing provision of industrial bulk goods, though this does not hold true for services. Even if family policy is not limited to economic measures and, for example, should carefully ward off external influences hostile to the family, it will nevertheless have to see its principal task in the economic security of the family. One may then hope that the integration of the family into the industrial society will be more and more successful. Of course, the equalization of family burdens will not as such be a motive for giving life to even a single child for parents who know the meaning of marriage and family. 70
Abstracting from so-called 'asocial persons', the Yes or No to a child will not be determined by monetary allowances, but ultimately by the image that the spouses have of marriage and family. The equalization of family burdens can and should mean only the realizing of social justice in the industrial society. Economic aid to families has been introduced today in almost all nations. Whereas the family allowance in some countries such as France, Belgium, and Luxemburg is quite high, in the Federal Republic of Germany it has been kept within moderate limits. In addition it is partially neutralized again by the sales tax. In view of the threatening drop in the birth rate, additional aid to the family is urgently necessary through, for instance, legal protection against summary dismissal for employees with more than two children or a lowering of contributions to social security according to the number of children. § 5 Marriage and Virginity 1. Just as it is disturbing to the Christian to speak of the advantages of private property without mentioning Christian poverty, so it would be even more suspect to praise marriage and family without mentioning virginity for the sake of Christ. Here two contradictory errors are to be rejected which affect the woman's life above all. First, one says that the married woman cannot find her fulfillment in 'monotonous and mindless housework' and needs professional activity outside the home for the development of her personality. Then it is said again that the unmarried person is useless and 'half a person' . 2. Anyone who knows about the Christian ideal of marriage and family will not take the first objection seriously. The community of home, table, and household as well as the cultivation of spiritual, moral, and religious values in the family present the spouse and mother with such great and noble tasks that she can find in them the fulfillment of her life in the most beautiful way. 3. The second thesis is equally erroneous. For marriage and physical mother- hood are not the only way to the fulfillment of the woman's personality. On September 15, 1952, Pius XII complained of „all the priests and laymen, preachers, orators,“ who „no longer have any word of praise for virginity dedicated to Christ, who for years have in principle placed marriage above virginity in spite of the warnings of the Church and contrary to her conception of things, who even go so far as to present marriage as the only means to the full development of the human personality and to its natural perfection.“ Virginity for the sake of Christ is not an individualistic mastery of instinct, but a participation in the virginity of the Church for which Christ gave himself up (Eph 5:25-27). The virgin is closer to the definitive form of human being than the married person; for the institution of marriage belongs to this age, and after the coming of the Lord thy will neither „marry“ nor be „given in marriage,“ but „become like angels“ and no longer be „liable to death. Sons of the resurrection, they are sons of God“ (Lk 20:35-36). It is a mark of the human personality that he or she is able to decide definitively and irrevocably for Christ, whether in marriage or in the single state. However, not all who remain single are called to virginity for the sake of Christ; for „of that voluntary renunciation out of love for the kingdom of God the Lord has said:' This saying is not for everyone, but only those to whom it is given“' (Pius XII, October 29, 1951). Many women live for years in the hope of marriage until they are forced to realize, that the love of a man and the happiness of a family of their own will be denied to them. A „ruthless, anxious, relentless scrutiny“ often begins then to see „whether one can discover in one's own face the feature that alienates other people, holds them at a distance, perhaps disappoints them, and 71
- Page 19 and 20: 5. In this outline, the presentatio
- Page 21 and 22: ern society considers everything
- Page 23 and 24: human sociality.“ 3 In the prayer
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER TWO: COMMUNITY, SOCIETY, LO
- Page 27 and 28: a) The flight into the impersonal
- Page 29 and 30: difficult to comprise Christian soc
- Page 31 and 32: intended; it is the totality of ins
- Page 33 and 34: ure and, above all, to the misuse o
- Page 35 and 36: tional economic co-operation (Gaudi
- Page 37 and 38: tive law, and that, on the other ha
- Page 39 and 40: In view of this sharp rejection of
- Page 41 and 42: „justice“ according to this law
- Page 43 and 44: 1. When the legal partners encounte
- Page 45 and 46: new formal object is exhibited here
- Page 47 and 48: PART TWO: THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL O
- Page 49 and 50: wished to have the feminine princip
- Page 51 and 52: to be emphasized that, precisely be
- Page 53 and 54: than an enchantment (fascination),
- Page 55 and 56: trivialize the serious problem of '
- Page 57 and 58: tion towards a decrease in the divo
- Page 59 and 60: Christian marriage and family are d
- Page 61 and 62: the family. Its origin is not of th
- Page 63 and 64: speaks of a new „metropolitan mat
- Page 65 and 66: schooling for conjugal love. It is
- Page 67 and 68: a) In primitive social relations, f
- Page 69: family“ is false. „While it mus
- Page 73 and 74: the doing, separates work from play
- Page 75 and 76: great thing if I could make shoes.
- Page 77 and 78: § 3 Work and Leisure 1. The Proble
- Page 79 and 80: ings, fields and work sites. In a s
- Page 81 and 82: the wage system bear inspection by
- Page 83 and 84: agreed wage. Above and beyond every
- Page 85 and 86: foreseen a few decades ago. For aut
- Page 87 and 88: ) Personnel management and authorit
- Page 89 and 90: place here: the price of raw materi
- Page 91 and 92: economic realm; integration in the
- Page 93 and 94: ody. For that reason, if man wishes
- Page 95 and 96: development worthy of man, for the
- Page 97 and 98: lations of the Creator as he manife
- Page 99 and 100: a) The market economy and free comp
- Page 101 and 102: nomic and civil progress?“ (42,1)
- Page 103 and 104: subject to Soviet imperialism. Thro
- Page 105 and 106: doctrine of historical epochs the f
- Page 107 and 108: nist community of goods might have
- Page 109 and 110: piece-work bonuses, and the like. L
- Page 111 and 112: (the rector multitudinis), of reali
- Page 113 and 114: towards absolutism“ (Georges Ripe
- Page 115 and 116: oad strata of the population posses
- Page 117 and 118: ) Dissemination of wealth through n
- Page 119 and 120: net profit of a national economy th
Abstracting from so-called 'asocial persons', the Yes or No to a child will not be determined<br />
by monetary allowances, but ultimately by the image that the spouses have of marriage and<br />
family. The equalization of family burdens can and should mean only the realizing of social<br />
justice in the industrial society. Economic aid to families has been introduced today in almost<br />
all nations. Whereas the family allowance in some countries such as France, Belgium, and<br />
Luxemburg is quite high, in the Federal Republic of Germany it has been kept within moderate<br />
limits. In addition it is partially neutralized again by the sales tax. In view of the threatening<br />
drop in the birth rate, additional aid to the family is urgently necessary through, for instance,<br />
legal protection against summary dismissal for employees with more than two children<br />
or a lowering of contributions to social security according to the number of children.<br />
§ 5 Marriage and Virginity<br />
1. Just as it is disturbing to the Christian to speak of the advantages of private property without<br />
mentioning Christian poverty, so it would be even more suspect to praise marriage and<br />
family without mentioning virginity for the sake of Christ. Here two contradictory errors are<br />
to be rejected which affect the woman's life above all. First, one says that the married woman<br />
cannot find her fulfillment in 'monotonous and mindless housework' and needs professional<br />
activity outside the home for the development of her personality. Then it is said again that the<br />
unmarried person is useless and 'half a person' .<br />
2. Anyone who knows about the Christian ideal of marriage and family will not take the first<br />
objection seriously. The community of home, table, and household as well as the cultivation<br />
of spiritual, moral, and religious values in the family present the spouse and mother with such<br />
great and noble tasks that she can find in them the fulfillment of her life in the most beautiful<br />
way.<br />
3. The second thesis is equally erroneous. For marriage and physical mother- hood are not the<br />
only way to the fulfillment of the woman's personality. On September 15, 1952, Pius XII<br />
complained of „all the priests and laymen, preachers, orators,“ who „no longer have any word<br />
of praise for virginity dedicated to Christ, who for years have in principle placed marriage<br />
above virginity in spite of the warnings of the Church and contrary to her conception of<br />
things, who even go so far as to present marriage as the only means to the full development of<br />
the human personality and to its natural perfection.“<br />
Virginity for the sake of Christ is not an individualistic mastery of instinct, but a participation<br />
in the virginity of the Church for which Christ gave himself up (Eph 5:25-27). The virgin is<br />
closer to the definitive form of human being than the married person; for the institution of<br />
marriage belongs to this age, and after the coming of the Lord thy will neither „marry“ nor be<br />
„given in marriage,“ but „become like angels“ and no longer be „liable to death. Sons of the<br />
resurrection, they are sons of God“ (Lk 20:35-36). It is a mark of the human personality that<br />
he or she is able to decide definitively and irrevocably for Christ, whether in marriage or in<br />
the single state.<br />
However, not all who remain single are called to virginity for the sake of Christ; for „of that<br />
voluntary renunciation out of love for the kingdom of God the Lord has said:' This saying is<br />
not for everyone, but only those to whom it is given“' (Pius XII, October 29, 1951). Many<br />
women live for years in the hope of marriage until they are forced to realize, that the love of a<br />
man and the happiness of a family of their own will be denied to them. A „ruthless, anxious,<br />
relentless scrutiny“ often begins then to see „whether one can discover in one's own face the<br />
feature that alienates other people, holds them at a distance, perhaps disappoints them, and<br />
71