Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The encyclical“ Laborem exercens „ furthermore describes the family as'' a community made<br />
possible by work and the first school of work, within the home, for every person.“ It therefore<br />
„constitutes one of the most important terms of reference for shaping the social and ethical<br />
order of human work“ (10,1). This is clearly not the picture of a family splitting up into different<br />
individuals and merely held together by external purposes but the perception, which is<br />
almost a matter of course among ordinary people in particular; that all members of the family<br />
support one another and together build up their existence.<br />
2. The Law of Dispatch<br />
As a cell of human society, the family stands under the law of dispatch. Upon the joy of leading<br />
one's own child to maturity, to independence, and to fitness for life there follows the sorrowful<br />
knowledge of the near departure of the children, which results from the nature of the<br />
family. Indissolubility holds only for marriage, not for the family. The modem family of industrial<br />
society in particular has something very ephemeral about it. Whereas agrarian families<br />
often stay for centuries on the same farmstead, so that the family household continues to<br />
exist without interruption from generation to generation, the modem urban family is founded<br />
in order to pass away again after a few decades. The clan no longer has a permanent homestead,<br />
which is, no doubt, a loss.<br />
That the children gradually outgrow the family should not lead to emotional alienation. Nor<br />
should it be a carefree sliding part from another, but a sending off that is neither selfish nor<br />
jealous. St. Augustine therefore calls the family a „nursery of society“; 79 God has gifted the<br />
family with fruitfulness not only that the deceased may have successors, but also that the living<br />
may have companions. Understandably, it not infrequently happens that the father as well<br />
as the mother resist the children's becoming independent. In the father's case, patriarchal motives<br />
may now and then playa part here even today. On the mother's side, the danger of wanting<br />
to tie her child to herself in an exaggerated way is particularly great when he or she is an<br />
only child and when the father is lacking, as is the case with unmarried mothers and with the<br />
divorced or widowed woman. Such overly strong ties often have unfavorable consequences in<br />
the later marriages of these children, since unconscious impediments stand in the way of emotional<br />
devotion to their spouses. In other cases, the parents seek to keep their grown children<br />
with them for economic reasons such as cheap labor. In surveys, farm daughters make resigned<br />
comments such as: I had to „help at home“, „was indispensable on my parents' farm,“<br />
and now lie professionally „on the reject pile.“ It is wrong to deny a solid professional training<br />
in agrarian families to the departing heirs, including the daughters. All the more should<br />
the conscience of the children not be coerced when it is a question of choosing a spouse or of<br />
a vocation to the priesthood or religious life. An Arabian proverb says: „You are the bow<br />
from which your children are shot as living arrows.“<br />
§ 3 The Family's Loss and Change of Function in the Industrial Society<br />
1.. The Loss of Function.<br />
It has become customary to make troubled complaints about the crisis and the decay of the<br />
family in the industrial society: The number of divorces in the last fifty years has more than<br />
quintupled. In the same time, the birth rate has sunk to a third. A terrible loss of function has<br />
undermined the family. No wonder husband, wife, and children live mutely and unhappily<br />
along- side each other and would like most of all to run away. This generalization is false. In<br />
the midst of all threats and with all necessary adaptation to new conditions, most families<br />
have remained true to their essential form, as if from a mysterious inner power. In a factual<br />
evaluation of the loss of function, two things are to be distinguished:<br />
79 De Civitate Dei, Lib. 15, c. 16 (II, 95).<br />
66