Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

ordosocialis.de
from ordosocialis.de More from this publisher
31.12.2012 Views

ened in the soul of the child of what it means to be loved by God undeservedly. It will be difficult for one who has never experienced the selfless love of a father and mother to believe in the eternal love of God during the hardships of life. Over the family table there hovers, as it were, the spirit of the primitive Jerusalem community: they were «of one heart and one mind...everything was held in common...(it was) distributed to everyone according to his need“ (Acts 4:32-35). The deep and holy meaning that inheres naturally in the common meal already shines forth in a new light in the order of salvation. We celebrate the Eucharist as the «Lord's Supper“ (I Co II :20), the symbol of love for one another and at the same time the sign and guarantee of heavenly beatitude, since we shall take our place „at the feast in the kingdom of God“ (Lk 13:29). The natural sharing of food at the family table takes place in the hope of God's goodness. For this reason, saying grace belongs to the family meal, whereby the family is aware that the request for bread does not stand in the middle of the Our Father because it is the centre and principal concern, but because one puts that which most needs protecting in the centre. God's holy name, God's kingdom, God's will stand above the request for bread. Holy Scripture calls earthly goods an additional gift of God: «Seek first his kingship over you, his way of holiness, and all these things will be given you besides“ (Mt 6:33). When the understanding of bread as an additional gift is lacking, the family slips into the danger of falling prey to consumer egoism and of seeing something spell-binding in material goods. In the modem family, the table is not only the site of the common meal, but also the place of common conversation, of play, of entertainment. Previously, people sat at the fireside for conversation. In modem homes, the family table has taken the place of the hearth, which has been 'objectivised' as the gas or electric stove in the kitchenette and can no longer serve as a site of conversation. Unfortunately, however, a questionable silence has come over many families which no longer allows cordial, personal talk to arise as it did in the time of engagement or in the first years of marriage. For weeks on end a family might talk in a matter-of-fact businesslike way about household expenses, for instance. It is a tension-filled muteness, not that silence of which Romano Guardini says: „Nothing brings together so much as being silent together.“ They are mute next to one another and against one another, whether the tension exists between the father and the mother, or between the parents and the grown children, or between the children themselves. c) The common housekeeping A common home and a common table involve common housekeeping, which brings in a third important function of the family in its care for physical sustenance. In the modem family, common housekeeping is limited to the upkeep of the dwelling and clothing and also to the preparation of meals. The family household is no longer a production site since the highly industrialized economic life based on the division of labor has led to a state where most families shop for almost everything they need and where the father, and often the mother and grown children also, earn an income for the maintenance of the family through professional work outside the home. Family home and work place are usually separated from one another, often by many miles, so that mother and children are not familiar with the work place of the father. The professional position in social and economic life and the regular wage and salary income secured on the basis of gainful employment have become for workers (blue and white collar) today what property formerly meant for securing the existence of the family. A technically good professional training has replaced, as it were, the property that was necessary in the pre-industrial age for the existence of the family. In itself, this development does not represent a contradiction to the essential image of the family, since in the economic realm the family need not necessarily be a self-sufficient unit of production. Since the man is usually employed outside the home, the family household stands under the woman's control, even if more and more men are ready for cooperation, so that one often 62

speaks of a new „metropolitan matriarchy“ or of a „female rule“ as part of the „modem metropolitan form of life.“ 71 The management of the family household places great demands on the woman, so that it has been said in jest that a man whose wife suddenly got lost would have to publish the following advertisement: „I am looking for a woman to do my housekeeping. Fifteen to seventeen hour working day including Sundays and holidays. Training or good experience in cooking, sewing, and other household chores as well as book-keeping, health and child-care, and garden work. Must be healthy, cheerful, independent, flexible, and willing to work. No right to payor vacation.“ 72 On June 8, 1982, the Federal High Court of Germany established that a housewife works sixty hours a week. If in the course of the years a family succeeds in saving enough for a home of its own, that is due in large part to the capable and provident management by the woman. If, however, a woman fails in housekeeping, then, in spite of the good income of her husband, a 'secondary poverty' comes over the family, i.e. that poverty arises not from the income of the man being too small, but from its poor administration. 'Secondary poverty' arises above all when the housewife man- ages affairs according to the principle that „a living standard in accordance with our social standing amounts to twenty per cent more than the income of my husband.“ The Family in the Service of Spiritual, Moral, and Religious Values The family is the most important and formative community for human society. Because love and affection are the vital principle of the family, an educational and personality forming power issue from it that is without equal. Here the different functions of the parents, siblings, and grandparents respectively can be distinguished. „The first and fundamental structure for 'human ecology. is the family, in which man receives his formative ideas about truth and goodness. and learns what it means to love and to be loved, and thus what it actually means to be a person, ... in which children become aware of their dignity and prepare to face their unique and individual destiny“(Centesimus annus 39,1) a) The task of the parents According to Thomas Aquinas, we owe our parents three things: they gave us life, they raised us, and they educated us (11-11, 102, I). The goal of education, as Thomas adds, is to lead one to human perfection. The family is, as it were, the second, the spiritual womb in which the child born of the mother should mature to moral personality (continetur sub parentum cura, sicut sub quodam spirituali utero, 11-11, 10, 12). Without the loving 'address', the child threatens to atrophy psychically in spite of the best physical care, as one not seldom sees with institutionalized children (the danger of 'institutionalization'). Therefore the gainful employment of the mother outside the home represents a serious harm especially for the small child whose mental aptitude must be awakened by the loving 'Thou' of the mother: „When the mother smiles at her infant, the sec- ret invitation to smile back lies therein. From that day on, when this first hap- pens, the mother knows that she is understood by her child emotionally“ (August Vetter). Education requires a common effort on the part of the father and the mother. However, in modem society, the man is especially threatened by the danger of becoming alienated from his fatherly status and of paying the 'role of the outsider' in his own family, partly because he must spend the better part of the day outside the family professionally, partly because he withdraws himself from the family, partly because his figure and authority are obscured by an all too mechanical interpretation and application of the principle of equal rights, as if there 71 W Brepohl, Der Aufbau des Ruhrvolkes im Zuge der Ost- West- Wanderung (Recklinghausen, 1948), 220. 72 Ruth Dirx, Welt der Arbeit, November 15, 1957. 63

speaks of a new „metropolitan matriarchy“ or of a „female rule“ as part of the „modem metropolitan<br />

form of life.“ 71 The management of the family household places great demands on<br />

the woman, so that it has been said in jest that a man whose wife suddenly got lost would<br />

have to publish the following advertisement: „I am looking for a woman to do my housekeeping.<br />

Fifteen to seventeen hour working day including Sundays and holidays. Training or good<br />

experience in cooking, sewing, and other household chores as well as book-keeping, health<br />

and child-care, and garden work. Must be healthy, cheerful, independent, flexible, and willing<br />

to work. No right to payor vacation.“ 72 On June 8, 1982, the Federal High Court of Germany<br />

established that a housewife<br />

works sixty hours a week.<br />

If in the course of the years a family succeeds in saving enough for a home of its own, that is<br />

due in large part to the capable and provident management by the woman. If, however, a<br />

woman fails in housekeeping, then, in spite of the good income of her husband, a 'secondary<br />

poverty' comes over the family, i.e. that poverty arises not from the income of the man being<br />

too small, but from its poor administration. 'Secondary poverty' arises above all when the<br />

housewife man- ages affairs according to the principle that „a living standard in accordance<br />

with our social standing amounts to twenty per cent more than the income of my husband.“<br />

The Family in the Service of Spiritual, Moral, and Religious Values<br />

The family is the most important and formative community for human society. Because love<br />

and affection are the vital principle of the family, an educational and personality forming<br />

power issue from it that is without equal. Here the different functions of the parents, siblings,<br />

and grandparents respectively can be distinguished.<br />

„The first and fundamental structure for 'human ecology. is the family, in which man receives<br />

his formative ideas about truth and goodness. and learns what it means to love and to be<br />

loved, and thus what it actually means to be a person, ... in which children become aware of<br />

their dignity and prepare to face their unique and individual destiny“(Centesimus annus 39,1)<br />

a) The task of the parents<br />

According to Thomas Aquinas, we owe our parents three things: they gave us life, they raised<br />

us, and they educated us (11-11, 102, I). The goal of education, as Thomas adds, is to lead one<br />

to human perfection. The family is, as it were, the second, the spiritual womb in which the<br />

child born of the mother should mature to moral personality (continetur sub parentum cura,<br />

sicut sub quodam spirituali utero, 11-11, 10, 12). Without the loving 'address', the child<br />

threatens to atrophy psychically in spite of the best physical care, as one not seldom sees with<br />

institutionalized children (the danger of 'institutionalization'). Therefore the gainful employment<br />

of the mother outside the home represents a serious harm especially for the small child<br />

whose mental aptitude must be awakened by the loving 'Thou' of the mother: „When the<br />

mother smiles at her infant, the sec- ret invitation to smile back lies therein. From that day on,<br />

when this first hap- pens, the mother knows that she is understood by her child emotionally“<br />

(August Vetter).<br />

Education requires a common effort on the part of the father and the mother. However, in<br />

modem society, the man is especially threatened by the danger of becoming alienated from his<br />

fatherly status and of paying the 'role of the outsider' in his own family, partly because he<br />

must spend the better part of the day outside the family professionally, partly because he<br />

withdraws himself from the family, partly because his figure and authority are obscured by an<br />

all too mechanical interpretation and application of the principle of equal rights, as if there<br />

71 W Brepohl, Der Aufbau des Ruhrvolkes im Zuge der Ost- West- Wanderung (Recklinghausen, 1948), 220.<br />

72 Ruth Dirx, Welt der Arbeit, November 15, 1957.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!