Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

ordosocialis.de
from ordosocialis.de More from this publisher
31.12.2012 Views

the industrial age. The fundamental principles of natural law are therefore not grasped formally first and then determined in content, but, conversely, experienced and learned concretely and objectively from childhood on in the family in which the essential elements of right can be demonstrated, so that the knowledge of principles and of modes of being are united at the root. That misinterpretations of natural law can be demonstrated among many peoples is evidence neither against natural law nor against its knowability. As history teaches, even the fundamental norms are exposed to error. Even if, for example, man’s right to life has been recognized in principle in all cultural areas, this right has nevertheless been obscured in certain cases such as human sacrifice and exposure of infants. Erroneous conceptions occurred more frequently the realm of the so-called applied natural law in which the principles of natural law are related to current conditions. To hit on what is right here - „not all are able to do this carefully, but only those who are wise,“ writes Thomas Aquinas (I-II, 100, 1). To decipher the „demands of the law that God has written „in the heart“ of man (Rom 2:15) even in its fineness is often a laborious enterprise and one threatened by error. Ignorance and misinterpretation of the natural law have their deepest ground in the limitedness of the human mind and in its darkening through original sin. These errors are not infrequently strengthened and hardened by false theories and by public opinion. It is a consoling thought that Christ, as the Second Vatican Council teaches, has entrusted his Church, the „teacher of the truth,“ with the mission to declare and confirm by her authority those principles of the moral order which have their origin in human nature itself“ (Dignitatis humanae, 14) - a mission assigned to the Magisterium and not to the pastorate of the Church, as Jakob David thinks. 33 CHAPTER TWO: THE VIRTUE OF JUSTICE § 1 The Essence of Justice 1. When justice is mentioned in modern philosophy of law, not infrequently the ‘moral idea of law’ is meant. Under the rejection of natural law, and as its replacement, as it were, it is thought to stand somewhere behind positive law, but outside the sphere of law proper. It is further assumed to raise the in no way undisputed claim of being the moral measure of existing law. Over against this basically legal-positivistic conception of law, Christian social teaching sees in justice a virtue, namely, that moral attitude „whereby one renders to each one his due by a constant and perpetual will“ (Thomas Aquinas, II-II, 58,1). The one who practices justice seeks not his or her own right, but gives or allows the other one his or her right. 2. Justice is one of the four cardinal virtues and thus a principal virtue on which the other virtue hinge (sicut in cardine). It presupposes law, particularly natural law, from which it receives its meaning and orientation. From this, it follows that the three properties of law will also accompany the virtue of justice: relatedness to others, strict indebtedness, and exact proportion between what is owed and what is given. If one of these properties is lacking or even diminished, we are no longer within the jurisdiction of the cardinal virtue of justice, but in that of one of its attendant virtues, such as piety, truthfulness, gratitude, or liberality. § 2 The Fundamental Forms of Justice Justice is the great orderer of human social life. Since Aristotle (Nichomachean Ethics), the Western tradition has distinguished three fundamental forms of justice according to the three fundamental social relationships: the relation of equal legal partners to one another, the relation of the social body to its members, and the relation of the members to the social body. 33 Jakob David, Das Naturrecht in Krise und Läuterung. Köln 1967, S. 65 ff. - Cf. Ludwig Berg, Naturrecht im Neuen Testament, in: Jahrbuch f. Christl. Sozialwissenschaften, Bd. 9 (1968), S. 23ff. 42

1. When the legal partners encounter one another on an equal plane, justitia commutativa (commutative, balancing justice in commerce, contracts, and trade) exercises its office. Its violation through theft, injury, or an attempt on the body and life of one’s neighbor creates a situation of injustice that must not only be repented inwardly, but also repaired outwardly. In the industrial society, commutative justice makes its appearance in four realms above all: a) The industrial society is a commercialized society in which almost everything that households require in terms of goods and services is bought, so that the justice of prices has attained an importance unsuspected in earlier economic periods in which self-provision was widespread. b) Since in the developed industrial society approximately eighty per cent of the gainfully employed practice their professions as wage-earning laborers, office workers, and civil servants, commercial justice must take effect in a special way in employer-employee relations (fair pay, fulfillment of duties at the work place). c) More than four fifths of the population in industrial states are inserted into the system of ‘social security’, which yields a further important realm of commutative justice. Insurance fraud is a violation of commercial justice, not only in private insurance, but also in the forms of social insurance established by law (health insurance, accident insurance, and so on). This fact must be especially emphasized since lax opinions prevail here to a large extent. d) Commutative justice is gaining increasing importance in the modern traffic system; here it is to be noted that the duty to make restitution in the case of traffic accidents where one party is at fault also holds with respect to the family of the one injured or killed. 2.) Even if commercial justice is extremely important for human coexistence, an even greater importance , nevertheless, attaches, especially today, to those fundamental forms of justice that regulate the strained relations between individuals and society. Here is to be named first that fundamental form of justice, which orders the relation of the social body to its members from above, as it were: justitia distributiva (distributive, apportioning justice). Its goal is to allow individual people to participate in the common good through a just distribution, so that spiritual and moral development becomes possible for all. Since the same position does not attach in every respect to each individual and to each group within the social whole, it is not the arithmetic equality holding for commutative justice, bur rather a geometrical equality that corresponds to apportioning justice, as for instance, that which forms the basis of the tax laws. Every kind of corruption, favoritism, and oppression of particular people or groups is a travesty of distributive justice. Distributive justice therefore obligates above all those who exercise power in the social body (of the community and the state), whereas the members act in the spirit of distributive justice when they are satisfied with just measures. Incidentally, if a state were to violate not only the position of the citizens within the national whole, but also human rights, it would offend against distributive as well as against commutative justice. 3. Social bodies are also bearer of rights. This brings us to the third form of justice: justitia legalis (legal or legislative justice), whose formal object is the orientation to the common good. It is to be distinguished from apportioning justice, for, whereas legal justice is oriented to the creation of the common good, apportioning justice aims at the individual or, more precisely, at the distribution of the common good appropriate to the respective position of the individual. Legal justice is found, principally and, so to speak, ‘architectonically’ in the legis- 43

the industrial age. The fundamental principles of natural law are therefore not grasped formally<br />

first and then determined in content, but, conversely, experienced and learned concretely<br />

and objectively from childhood on in the family in which the essential elements of<br />

right can be demonstrated, so that the knowledge of principles and of modes of being are<br />

united at the root.<br />

That misinterpretations of natural law can be demonstrated among many peoples is evidence<br />

neither against natural law nor against its knowability. As history teaches, even the fundamental<br />

norms are exposed to error. Even if, for example, man’s right to life has been recognized in<br />

principle in all cultural areas, this right has nevertheless been obscured in certain cases such<br />

as human sacrifice and exposure of infants. Erroneous conceptions occurred more frequently<br />

the realm of the so-called applied natural law in which the principles of natural law are related<br />

to current conditions. To hit on what is right here - „not all are able to do this carefully, but<br />

only those who are wise,“ writes Thomas Aquinas (I-II, 100, 1). To decipher the „demands of<br />

the law that God has written „in the heart“ of man (Rom 2:15) even in its fineness is often a<br />

laborious enterprise and one threatened by error. Ignorance and misinterpretation of the natural<br />

law have their deepest ground in the limitedness of the human mind and in its darkening<br />

through original sin. These errors are not infrequently strengthened and hardened by false<br />

theories and by public opinion. It is a consoling thought that Christ, as the Second Vatican<br />

Council teaches, has entrusted his Church, the „teacher of the truth,“ with the mission to declare<br />

and confirm by her authority those principles of the moral order which have their origin<br />

in human nature itself“ (Dignitatis humanae, 14) - a mission assigned to the Magisterium and<br />

not to the pastorate of the Church, as Jakob David thinks. 33<br />

CHAPTER TWO: THE VIRTUE OF JUSTICE<br />

§ 1 The Essence of Justice<br />

1. When justice is mentioned in modern philosophy of law, not infrequently the ‘moral idea of<br />

law’ is meant. Under the rejection of natural law, and as its replacement, as it were, it is<br />

thought to stand somewhere behind positive law, but outside the sphere of law proper. It is<br />

further assumed to raise the in no way undisputed claim of being the moral measure of existing<br />

law. Over against this basically legal-positivistic conception of law, Christian social<br />

teaching sees in justice a virtue, namely, that moral attitude „whereby one renders to each one<br />

his due by a constant and perpetual will“ (Thomas Aquinas, II-II, 58,1). The one who practices<br />

justice seeks not his or her own right, but gives or allows the other one his or her right. 2.<br />

Justice is one of the four cardinal virtues and thus a principal virtue on which the other virtue<br />

hinge (sicut in cardine). It presupposes law, particularly natural law, from which it receives its<br />

meaning and orientation. From this, it follows that the three properties of law will also accompany<br />

the virtue of justice: relatedness to others, strict indebtedness, and exact proportion<br />

between what is owed and what is given. If one of these properties is lacking or even diminished,<br />

we are no longer within the jurisdiction of the cardinal virtue of justice, but in that of<br />

one of its attendant virtues, such as piety, truthfulness, gratitude, or liberality.<br />

§ 2 The Fundamental Forms of Justice<br />

Justice is the great orderer of human social life. Since Aristotle (Nichomachean Ethics), the<br />

Western tradition has distinguished three fundamental forms of justice according to the three<br />

fundamental social relationships: the relation of equal legal partners to one another, the relation<br />

of the social body to its members, and the relation of the members to the social body.<br />

33 Jakob David, Das Naturrecht in Krise und Läuterung. Köln 1967, S. 65 ff. - Cf. Ludwig Berg, Naturrecht im<br />

Neuen Testament, in: Jahrbuch f. Christl. Sozialwissenschaften, Bd. 9 (1968), S. 23ff.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!