Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis

ordosocialis.de
from ordosocialis.de More from this publisher
31.12.2012 Views

familiar with and to analyze the concrete conditions. 31 Natural law is indeed transhistorically valid, but is operative only in history, of course. In this respect it is in no way „ahistorical“ or „transhistorical“ or „transcendent,“ but immanent in the current historical systems. Natural law is a „program“ to be continually realized. § 3 Natural Law and Positive Law 1. The concern of natural law wad fully mistaken when, in the eighteenth century, certain Enlightenment jurists made everything a ‘natural law’ that seemed somehow „reasonable“ to them. At that time, some proved that man possesses a natural right to jewelry and cosmetic items (Christian Wolff); others declared that the establishment of post offices was a demand of natural law; still others made out the constitution, so that the distinction between of the Holy Roman Empire, the feudal system, or the constitution of the French Revolution to be of natural law so that the distinction between natural and positive law was hopelessly blurred. In reality, the recognition of natural law, which is not a law of reason but a law of man’s essence, in no way makes positive legislation superfluous. Natural law contains the fundamental norms that result from the essence of man, that are transtemporally valid, supreme, and universal, and that precisely for this reason are so important for the legal system. It would, however, be utopian to consider these fundamental norms as sufficient for the ordering of human coexistence and to consider positive laws superfluous. It is positive laws that first create the kinds of law applicable to the current historical conditions (constitutional and administrative law, commercial law, tax law, civil and penal law, and so on). Here it is to be noted that the fundamental norms of natural law are indeed immanent to the body of positive laws but that the positive laws further contain numerous historically conditioned and therefore mutable elements, so that a great leeway is left to the creative power of the legislator. 2. The relation of natural law to positive law can be determined in particular through five principles: a) The obligatory character of the positive legal system results from natural law, which obligates the legislator to enact laws demanded by the common good and the citizen to obey those laws. b) The natural law is immanent in many positive laws in such a way that they can be designated as a codified natural law, such as the prohibition and punishment of murder. c) Other positive laws are concrete realizations of the principles of natural law adapted to the current historical conditions (applied natural law). To what degree an institution that intrinsically belongs to natural law is subject to historicity is shown by private ownership which „ like other elements of social life“ is not „absolutely unchanging“ and whose closer delineation is left rather to „the industry of men and institutions of peoples“ (Quadragesimo anno,49). d) Most positive laws are not determined by natural law in their content, but are subject to the general demand of natural law to serve the common good, such as most stipulations of civil law, procedural law, penal law, tax law, and so on. Because of their social, political, and economic conditionedness, these laws are entirely different according to times and peoples. e) Positive laws that represent an unambiguous violation of the fundamental norms of natural law are invalid. A law that, for example, denies the right to life to a particular people (that, for instance, orders the murdering of Jewish children) is invalid, and a judge who administers 31 Cf. Jos. Höffner, Kolonialismus und Evangelium. 3. Aufl. Trier 1972, S. 243 ff. 40

„justice“ according to this law or an executioner who executes such a sentence is a criminal, and is so at all times and in every cultural area. When during the Boxer Rebellion (1900-01) the slogan ‘no mercy will be given’ sprang up, the Berlin university professor Friedrich Paulsen wrote:“ There would be no German officer who would command such a bloody deed (the murder of prisoners) and no German soldier who would carry it out...And what is to happen with the wounded...? Should we make it a principle that the sons of our people...kill the wounded? Again, I am convinced that the horror of such bloodshed would itself offer resistance to the command.“ 32 Actions that contradict „ universal natural law and its all-embracing principles“ are „criminal,“ according to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, as are the „orders commanding such actions,“ and „blind obedience cannot excuse those who yield to them“ (Gaudium et spes, 79). An example of this is the elimination of an entire people or of a national minority. § 4 The Properties of Natural Law The law of man’s essence, natural law possesses three properties: universal validity, immutability, and knowability. 1. Universal validity. because natural law results from a human nature that is the same for all people, it obligates everyone. It has indeed been affirmed that the irrational, inconceivable, and creative character of political decision lifts the statesman, like the artist, above the mass of other people and thus above the law. According to Christian thought, this thesis is not only false, but also fateful in its consequences for the nation and for humankind. Without universal validity, natural law would no longer be natural law. 2. Immutability. Whereas positive laws are subject to change because of their dependence on the current conditions and can be fully abrogated if need be, the fundamental principles of natural law are immutable since they rest on the consistency of human nature. They can be neither rendered void, nor changed, nor mitigated through privileges or dispensations. In the Middle Ages, certain theologians did indeed attempt to ground natural law, not in the essence of man created by God, but in the will of God who, without transforming human nature, could change the norms of natural law and, for example, order „hatred of God, theft, and adultery“(William of Ockham† 1349. This moral-positivistic thesis), which is also found in Peter Abelard († 1164) and Duns Scotus († 1308), mistakes the ontological foundation of natural law which ultimately rests on the essence, not the will, of God. The immutability of natural law in no way contradicts the historicity of man, since natural law rests on the transtemporally valid, metaphysical constitution of man’s essence. Individual people and humanity living in space and time are subject to historical change, but metaphysical human nature is not. Thus, for example, the claim to vitally necessary commodities resulting from man’s right to life takes a form different for the infant from that for the adult, but is in both cases the same natural right. The institutions of natural law that are adapted to the current social conditions are also accustomed to change with these conditions, as is the case, for example, with private ownership. The principles of natural law themselves, however, are transtemporally valid and therefore immutable. 3. Knowability. It is not infrequently affirmed that natural law contains „purely formal propositions“ (Johann Sauter) which only subsequently have to be made concrete in a laborious way. In reality man gains the essential insights of natural law originally and immediately „in the fundamental social situation of the family community“ (Johannes Messner), be it a question of the extended patriarchal family of former cultures or of the two-generation family of 32 Cited in. V. Cathrein, Moralphilosophie. I. 414. 41

„justice“ according to this law or an executioner who executes such a sentence is a criminal,<br />

and is so at all times and in every cultural area. When during the Boxer Rebellion (1900-01)<br />

the slogan ‘no mercy will be given’ sprang up, the Berlin university professor Friedrich<br />

Paulsen wrote:“ There would be no German officer who would command such a bloody deed<br />

(the murder of prisoners) and no German soldier who would carry it out...And what is to happen<br />

with the wounded...? Should we make it a principle that the sons of our people...kill the<br />

wounded? Again, I am convinced that the horror of such bloodshed would itself offer resistance<br />

to the command.“ 32 Actions that contradict „ universal natural law and its all-embracing<br />

principles“ are „criminal,“ according to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, as are the<br />

„orders commanding such actions,“ and „blind obedience cannot excuse those who yield to<br />

them“ (Gaudium et spes, 79). An example of this is the elimination of an entire people or of a<br />

national minority.<br />

§ 4 The Properties of Natural Law<br />

The law of man’s essence, natural law possesses three properties: universal validity, immutability,<br />

and knowability.<br />

1. Universal validity. because natural law results from a human nature that is the same for all<br />

people, it obligates everyone. It has indeed been affirmed that the irrational, inconceivable,<br />

and creative character of political decision lifts the statesman, like the artist, above the mass<br />

of other people and thus above the law. According to Christian thought, this thesis is not only<br />

false, but also fateful in its consequences for the nation and for humankind. Without universal<br />

validity, natural law would no longer be natural law.<br />

2. Immutability. Whereas positive laws are subject to change because of their dependence on<br />

the current conditions and can be fully abrogated if need be, the fundamental principles of<br />

natural law are immutable since they rest on the consistency of human nature. They can be<br />

neither rendered void, nor changed, nor mitigated through privileges or dispensations. In the<br />

Middle Ages, certain theologians did indeed attempt to ground natural law, not in the essence<br />

of man created by God, but in the will of God who, without transforming human nature, could<br />

change the norms of natural law and, for example, order „hatred of God, theft, and adultery“(William<br />

of Ockham† 1349. This moral-positivistic thesis), which is also found in Peter<br />

Abelard († 1164) and Duns Scotus († 1308), mistakes the ontological foundation of natural<br />

law which ultimately rests on the essence, not the will, of God. The immutability of natural<br />

law in no way contradicts the historicity of man, since natural law rests on the transtemporally<br />

valid, metaphysical constitution of man’s essence. Individual people and humanity living in<br />

space and time are subject to historical change, but metaphysical human nature is not. Thus,<br />

for example, the claim to vitally necessary commodities resulting from man’s right to life<br />

takes a form different for the infant from that for the adult, but is in both cases the same natural<br />

right. The institutions of natural law that are adapted to the current social conditions are<br />

also accustomed to change with these conditions, as is the case, for example, with private<br />

ownership. The principles of natural law themselves, however, are transtemporally valid and<br />

therefore immutable.<br />

3. Knowability. It is not infrequently affirmed that natural law contains „purely formal propositions“<br />

(Johann Sauter) which only subsequently have to be made concrete in a laborious<br />

way. In reality man gains the essential insights of natural law originally and immediately „in<br />

the fundamental social situation of the family community“ (Johannes Messner), be it a question<br />

of the extended patriarchal family of former cultures or of the two-generation family of<br />

32 Cited in. V. Cathrein, Moralphilosophie. I. 414.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!