Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Joseph Cardinal Höffner CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ... - Ordo Socialis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a) No Objection to Pioneer Profits<br />
No objections are to be raised against the so-called ‘pioneer profit’, which ultimately stands in<br />
the service of the consumer, provided that this profit is invested in an economically meaningful<br />
way. Here one can refer to Quadragesimo anno, where it says that „expending larger incomes<br />
so that opportunity for gainful work may be abundant...ought to be considered...an outstanding<br />
exemplification of the virtue of munificence and one particularly suited to the needs<br />
of the times“(n.51) The emphatic affirmation given by the Second Vatican Council to the dynamic<br />
economy and to business initiative drew much attention: with an aim „at making provision<br />
for the growth of a people and at meeting the rising expectations of the human<br />
race...technical progress must be fostered, along with a spirit of initiative, an eagerness to create<br />
and expand enterprises, the adaptation of methods of production, and the strenuous efforts<br />
of all who engage in production - in a word, all the elements making for such development“<br />
(Gaudium et spes, 64).<br />
b) Rejection of Monopoly profits<br />
Monopoly profits have been rejected by Christian social teaching for centuries as usurious. In<br />
the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries, the expression ‘monopoly’, , must have had<br />
an emotionally charged ring similar to that of the word ‘capitalism’ in the last hundred years.<br />
Monopolists are „usurpers“ since they illegally make themselves the authors of prices (Franciscus<br />
Sylvius, † l649); they undertake an „attack upon public freedom“, since people „are<br />
forced by monopoly to pay a higher price“ than would be the case without the monopoly (Cajetan,<br />
† l534). One should drive monopolists out of the country, since they are more harmful<br />
„than crop failures and locusts“ (Juan de Medina, † l546). 73<br />
c) Marketing Profit and Distribution of Wealth<br />
Inasmuch as market profits have accrued to entrepreneurs on the basis of the economic policy<br />
set by the government since the monetary reform, the conscience of the individual entrepreneur<br />
should not be disturbed on account of these profits. As presented above, however, it is<br />
urgently necessary to take appropriate measures without delay that will render possible a<br />
broad dissemination of wealth in the capital sector.<br />
d) Business Profits and the Sense of Service<br />
Business profits must be purified and ennobled by a sense of service to the community as a<br />
whole. If this willingness to serve is disregarded, there remains, according to Thomas Aquinas,<br />
the mere pursuit of profit, which „has a certain debasement attaching to it“ (II-II, 77, 4),<br />
and which, as Domingo de Soto († l560) writes, provokes an „unquenchable thirst“ and makes<br />
the entrepreneur like the „gambler.“ 74<br />
e) The Ethos of Advertising<br />
In order to increase sales and profits, businessmen make use of advertising, which should give<br />
factual information to the buyer, as is common among businesses themselves, for example,<br />
when purchasing machine tools. The broad stratum of ultimate consumers, however, is not<br />
informed in the correct manner, but, especially in illustrated sex magazines, confused and<br />
befogged by constant exposure to suggestive stimuli. Consumers seem to be happy about this;<br />
they have the advertising they deserve and pay for. Businessmen are obligated in conscience<br />
to advertise factually and truthfully and to exclude destructive publications as advertising vehicles.<br />
73<br />
Cf. <strong>Joseph</strong> <strong>Höffner</strong>, Wirtschaftsethik und Monopole im 15. u. 16. Jh., 2nd ed. (Darmstadt, 1969), 135f.<br />
74<br />
Ibid., 106.<br />
125