Regional Reports - the European External Action Service

Regional Reports - the European External Action Service Regional Reports - the European External Action Service

eeas.europa.eu
from eeas.europa.eu More from this publisher
30.12.2012 Views

Regarding typologies, the findings showed that regional NGOs are the most important NSA in terms of amount of resource mobilized (57%). More specifically, REST alone has 12 ongoing projects the total value of which is about 95% of the indicated regional NGO projects. The resource inputs of the national and international secular NGOs is dwarfed by the amount mobilized and used by REST to implement the capital intensive and extensive rural food security projects. 3.3. Zonal Distribution of Ongoing Projects As shown below (Table 5), a good amount of the financial contributions from NSA went to the Central Tigray Zone. It is interesting to note that the zone where many NGOs are operational (Mekele) is the least in the financial value of projects. This illustrates as how the urban-based social projects are small-scale in nature compared to the rural projects. Table 5: NSA project finance by zones No of No of Zones Projects NGOs Value of the Projects, Birr Central 8 3 161,029,651 Southern 13 10 57,442,136 Western 7 6 57,250,313 Eastern 10 5 55,859,482 Mekele 16 15 30,589,197 Regional and multi-zone projects 12 10 129,899,053 66 492,069,831 3.4. Sectoral Participation The disaggregated profile of ongoing NGO projects with respect to core sectoral focuses is illustrated on Table 6, below. Integrated food security programmes, often comprising agricultural development supports, infrastructures (access roads, irrigation), environmental rehabilitation, WATSAN, HIV/AIDS, basic education, entrepreneurship, and institutional strengthening, are the most important participation areas of the NGOs, both in number of projects and total resource allocated. REST, WVE, AAE, EEC/ADCS, EOC/DICA and EECMY are the lead organizations involved in this area. Child development, particularly care and support for OVC, in institutionalized as well as noninstitutionalized arrangements is the second important participation area of NSA in Tigray. In this area, on top of the long-established child-support centres of the FBOs (EOC/CFAD and ECC/ADCS) the innovative and community-based projects of the newly established regional NGO Human beings Association of Brotherhood (HAB) is fast expanding coverage of NSA involvement in OVC support. The level of resource allocation for the other sectoral and cross-cutting areas appears to be small for two major reasons. In the first place, most of these activities are promoted as component elements of the integrated rural food security projects and programmes. Secondly, some of the sectoral projects are implemented by the regional NSA without entering formal project agreements at regional levels. Hence, resource allocated is not included in the survey. For example, CBOs like Iddirs, Anti-AIDS and SRH Clubs, and the MBAs are involved in: child 98

development; HIV/AIDS; environmental protection; and in promoting rights of their respective members. Table 6: Core focuses of ongoing projects Budget for ongoing % of total No of projects, budget Examples of NGOs Programme Focus Projects Birr allocated engaged (Integrated) rural REST, WVE, AAE, development and Food EECMY, ECC/ADCS, Security 24 340,634,034 69.2 Child Development 8 56,304,142 HAB, EOC/CFAD, 11.4 ECC/SDCO Health 13 43,411,149 MFM, IPAS, ECC/DOC, 8.8 REST Agriculture 3 16,402,683 3.3 Helevtas, REST & VOCA HIV/AIDS 5 14,054,320 2.9 OSSA, MSIE, DKT, MSFs Education 4 9,089,370 1.8 TDA, SC/US, Wofla Women empowerment and Panos Ethiopia & Mums for gender focused 2 8,418,413 1.7 Mums Water Supply & Sanitation 2 2,091,426 0.4 EOC/DICAC, EID Youth 1 1,316,404 0.3 SIM Support for PWDs & TDVA, RADO, ADCS & elderly 4 347,890 0.1 GG Total 66 492,069,831 3.5. Qualitative Information on NSA Contributions � In responding to and linking the short and longer-term needs of communities - the lead organization in this regard is REST. It is learned that, in the past, about 70% of the humanitarian relief work was used to be handled by REST 6 . Then since 2005, with financial support from USAID, REST is implementing the PSNP in 6 Woredas (reaches about 400,000 people with 600,000Q of grain /Annum). Because of the complementary and additional supports, the REST PSNP performance is already judged as 'impact oriented', and the agency is hosting visitors coming from other regions to learn from the experiences. When it comes to participation in development, REST claims the credit for innovating and demonstrating effectiveness of watershed based agricultural development approaches, water harvesting possibilities, the appropriateness of treadle-pumps for water lifting and dripirrigation by small scale farmers. Most of these initiatives are already integrated into the national agricultural extension system and implemented, but with varying levels of success. In terms of project coverage, REST has operational presence or some project activity in 25 of the 35 woredas of the region. In 12 woredas it has ongoing integrated watershed based agricultural development programmes, and in all the 25 there are water and health infrastructure development projects. With 730 full-time staff (100 first-degree and above), REST is said to have stronger overall capacity than some of the sector Bureaus. 6 From the discussion with Ato Yemane Solomon, Programme Coordinator, REST 99

Regarding typologies, <strong>the</strong> findings showed that regional NGOs are <strong>the</strong> most important NSA in<br />

terms of amount of resource mobilized (57%). More specifically, REST alone has 12 ongoing<br />

projects <strong>the</strong> total value of which is about 95% of <strong>the</strong> indicated regional NGO projects. The<br />

resource inputs of <strong>the</strong> national and international secular NGOs is dwarfed by <strong>the</strong> amount<br />

mobilized and used by REST to implement <strong>the</strong> capital intensive and extensive rural food security<br />

projects.<br />

3.3. Zonal Distribution of Ongoing Projects<br />

As shown below (Table 5), a good amount of <strong>the</strong> financial contributions from NSA went to <strong>the</strong><br />

Central Tigray Zone. It is interesting to note that <strong>the</strong> zone where many NGOs are operational<br />

(Mekele) is <strong>the</strong> least in <strong>the</strong> financial value of projects. This illustrates as how <strong>the</strong> urban-based<br />

social projects are small-scale in nature compared to <strong>the</strong> rural projects.<br />

Table 5: NSA project finance by zones<br />

No of No of<br />

Zones<br />

Projects NGOs Value of <strong>the</strong> Projects, Birr<br />

Central 8 3 161,029,651<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn 13 10 57,442,136<br />

Western 7 6 57,250,313<br />

Eastern 10 5 55,859,482<br />

Mekele 16 15 30,589,197<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> and multi-zone<br />

projects<br />

12 10 129,899,053<br />

66 492,069,831<br />

3.4. Sectoral Participation<br />

The disaggregated profile of ongoing NGO projects with respect to core sectoral focuses is<br />

illustrated on Table 6, below. Integrated food security programmes, often comprising agricultural<br />

development supports, infrastructures (access roads, irrigation), environmental rehabilitation,<br />

WATSAN, HIV/AIDS, basic education, entrepreneurship, and institutional streng<strong>the</strong>ning, are <strong>the</strong><br />

most important participation areas of <strong>the</strong> NGOs, both in number of projects and total resource<br />

allocated. REST, WVE, AAE, EEC/ADCS, EOC/DICA and EECMY are <strong>the</strong> lead organizations<br />

involved in this area.<br />

Child development, particularly care and support for OVC, in institutionalized as well as noninstitutionalized<br />

arrangements is <strong>the</strong> second important participation area of NSA in Tigray. In<br />

this area, on top of <strong>the</strong> long-established child-support centres of <strong>the</strong> FBOs (EOC/CFAD and<br />

ECC/ADCS) <strong>the</strong> innovative and community-based projects of <strong>the</strong> newly established regional<br />

NGO Human beings Association of Bro<strong>the</strong>rhood (HAB) is fast expanding coverage of NSA<br />

involvement in OVC support.<br />

The level of resource allocation for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sectoral and cross-cutting areas appears to be small<br />

for two major reasons. In <strong>the</strong> first place, most of <strong>the</strong>se activities are promoted as component<br />

elements of <strong>the</strong> integrated rural food security projects and programmes. Secondly, some of <strong>the</strong><br />

sectoral projects are implemented by <strong>the</strong> regional NSA without entering formal project<br />

agreements at regional levels. Hence, resource allocated is not included in <strong>the</strong> survey. For<br />

example, CBOs like Iddirs, Anti-AIDS and SRH Clubs, and <strong>the</strong> MBAs are involved in: child<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!