Regional Reports - the European External Action Service

Regional Reports - the European External Action Service Regional Reports - the European External Action Service

eeas.europa.eu
from eeas.europa.eu More from this publisher
30.12.2012 Views

H. All the NGOs active in Dire Dawa have Capacity Building components in their programs, most of which involve both the communities and public institutions (family guidance, HIV-AIDS, OVCs, Education etc.). For example Cheshire Services Ethiopia, working in the field of high level assistance for the disabled includes in the activities a referral system and a cooperation and integration with Public Health Services, with in the long term will produce his results in terms of capacity building; also Handicap International has capacity building for hospitals as an outstanding component. This is likely to produce effective policy cooperation in the specific field. 16. Networking In spite of the positive trends in the CBOs sector highlighted above, it has to be said that networking is rather weak in Dire Dawa. The dynamics are positive there are contacts between Civil Society Organisations but there are neither sectoral partnerships nor territorial networks. A certain degree of competition is still hampering the development of networks. The only important forum currently active and engaged in the participatory planning process is the Governance Action Learning Program which provides the ground for an active partnership between Local and National NGOs, CBOs, INGOs, Private sector and the Government. But in spite of this promissory GO/NGO arrangement NSA themselves find hart to network. This condition is found also among Business and Economic Interest Groups, the Organisations of Private Sector: in fact the two organisations so far haven’t established any for of cooperation and work with different (but complementary) priorities with no integration. 17. Dialogue and cooperation between NSA and Local Government. The city Government has shown a rather high degree of openness in cooperating with the NSA. The willingness to create of a basically enabling environment is shown by the facilitation for registration and licensing (the Bureau of justice adopts an advisory stance to facilitate the compliance with law requirements and speed-up the licensing process) and by providing premises in public-owned building for different organisations. The participatory approach is embedded in the participatory process established for the drafting of the IDP, the regional PASDEP. Different approaches have been used to facilitate participation in each planning stages of Dire Dawa IDP, namely: • the plan had benefited from ideas generated from future search conferences, discussion with representatives of the rural community and various stakeholders; • An IDP representative forum consisting of all cabinet members, sector office heads, urban and rural kebele officials, representatives of the urban and rural communities, youth and women associations; • NGOs, religious organizations, the business community, renowned persons and professionals have been established and deliberated on every stages of the planning process and passed important suggestions which are incorporated in the plan; • Successive in-house discussions of professionals have been conducted on various issues; • A workshop has also be organized at Addis Ababa Ghion hotel in which professionals from FUPI; DDDIPO, Private consultants and other professionals working in urban management area are participated; 60

• Project study teams had also made discussions at various levels with beneficiaries, implementing agencies and their employees, possible partners & other relevant stakeholders By these features the Government was willing to incorporate participation into the planning process Apart from the ideas obtained through various formal meetings and face to face discussions, an attempt is also made to gather additional ideas by popularizing the planning process via brochures, banners, news paper articles, posters and by organizing competitions and an exhibition. The review process aimed at aligning IDP with the PASDEP has given the opportunity to strengthen and make more effective this process through different actions: 1. Strengthening the sector policy dialogue and joint planning process through the establishment of a standing sectoral cooperation which acts through regular (weekly) meetings and the identification of NSA’s capabilities and willingness for cooperation at sector level. The process has shown overlapping and most of all lack of coverage from some thematic areas. The ongoing process will be aimed at stimulating a larger participation and establishing new partnership. The organisational capacity of the overall IDP review machinery has to be strengthened and the action sharpened to maximise NSA’s contribution and to give continuity to the pace of implementation; 2. Establishing a permanent forum of the stakeholders of the development process; 3. Establishing a permanent learning forum which brings together different categories of GO/NGO actors; 4. promoting resourcefulness and disseminating information at the grassroots level, by making the information available to CBOs; 5. Giving to NSA a stake in the monitoring process at the same level of Government Bodies. 18. Engagement in Policy Dialogue. The dialogue with the Government is based on: • Consultation of the different categories of NSA when some decision affecting their sector or interest is being made; • The establishment of the IDP representative forum • The creation of some permanent fora mostly initiated by the NSA. The dialogue is quite effective in terms of coordination and planning to avoid duplication of activities, although the recent sector dialogue has shown that the capabilities and interest of NSA doesn’t cover completely the needs. Yet it has to be said that it is rare that the dialogue involve the policy level. 19. Engagement in Political Dialogue Engagement in political dialogue is not in the current agenda of the NSA, although the opportunity offered by the planning exercise offer some room for an engagement if crafting the rule of the game and shaping the quality of NSA participation in the policy making process. 61

• Project study teams had also made discussions at various levels with<br />

beneficiaries, implementing agencies and <strong>the</strong>ir employees, possible partners &<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r relevant stakeholders<br />

By <strong>the</strong>se features <strong>the</strong> Government was willing to incorporate participation into <strong>the</strong> planning<br />

process<br />

Apart from <strong>the</strong> ideas obtained through various formal meetings and face to face discussions, an<br />

attempt is also made to ga<strong>the</strong>r additional ideas by popularizing <strong>the</strong> planning process via<br />

brochures, banners, news paper articles, posters and by organizing competitions and an<br />

exhibition.<br />

The review process aimed at aligning IDP with <strong>the</strong> PASDEP has given <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>n and make more effective this process through different actions:<br />

1. Streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong> sector policy dialogue and joint planning process through <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment of a standing sectoral cooperation which acts through regular (weekly)<br />

meetings and <strong>the</strong> identification of NSA’s capabilities and willingness for cooperation at<br />

sector level. The process has shown overlapping and most of all lack of coverage from<br />

some <strong>the</strong>matic areas. The ongoing process will be aimed at stimulating a larger<br />

participation and establishing new partnership. The organisational capacity of <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

IDP review machinery has to be streng<strong>the</strong>ned and <strong>the</strong> action sharpened to maximise<br />

NSA’s contribution and to give continuity to <strong>the</strong> pace of implementation;<br />

2. Establishing a permanent forum of <strong>the</strong> stakeholders of <strong>the</strong> development process;<br />

3. Establishing a permanent learning forum which brings toge<strong>the</strong>r different categories of<br />

GO/NGO actors;<br />

4. promoting resourcefulness and disseminating information at <strong>the</strong> grassroots level, by<br />

making <strong>the</strong> information available to CBOs;<br />

5. Giving to NSA a stake in <strong>the</strong> monitoring process at <strong>the</strong> same level of Government<br />

Bodies.<br />

18. Engagement in Policy Dialogue.<br />

The dialogue with <strong>the</strong> Government is based on:<br />

• Consultation of <strong>the</strong> different categories of NSA when some decision affecting <strong>the</strong>ir sector<br />

or interest is being made;<br />

• The establishment of <strong>the</strong> IDP representative forum<br />

• The creation of some permanent fora mostly initiated by <strong>the</strong> NSA.<br />

The dialogue is quite effective in terms of coordination and planning to avoid duplication of<br />

activities, although <strong>the</strong> recent sector dialogue has shown that <strong>the</strong> capabilities and interest of NSA<br />

doesn’t cover completely <strong>the</strong> needs.<br />

Yet it has to be said that it is rare that <strong>the</strong> dialogue involve <strong>the</strong> policy level.<br />

19. Engagement in Political Dialogue<br />

Engagement in political dialogue is not in <strong>the</strong> current agenda of <strong>the</strong> NSA, although <strong>the</strong><br />

opportunity offered by <strong>the</strong> planning exercise offer some room for an engagement if crafting <strong>the</strong><br />

rule of <strong>the</strong> game and shaping <strong>the</strong> quality of NSA participation in <strong>the</strong> policy making process.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!