Final Site Information Package for National Remedy Review Board ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SITE INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR NATIONAL REMEDY REVIEW BOARD PART B, SECTION 16: REFERENCES URS Greiner and CH2M HILL. March 25, 1999 (1999a). Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Plan Addenda for the Bunker Hill Basin-wide RI/FS. Addendum No. 13, School Yard/Daycare Sampling to Support the Human Health Risk Assessment/Removal Actions. URS Greiner and CH2M HILL. September 1999 (1999b). Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Plan Addenda for the Bunker Hill Basin-wide RI/FS. Addendum No. 07, Residential Sampling to Support the Human Health Risk Assessment. URS Greiner and CH2M HILL. December 1999 (1999c). Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Plan Addenda for the Bunker Hill Basin-wide RI/FS. Addendum No. 12. URS Greiner and CH2M HILL. August 2000. Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Plan Addenda for the Bunker Hill Basin-wide RI/FS. Addendum No. 16, Spring 2000 Call-in Residential and Mullan Football Field Sampling. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1989. Expected Annual Flood Damage Computation, Users Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1996. Risk Based Analysis for Flood Damage Reduction Studies. U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. 2008 Population Estimates. United States Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/ U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). October 1990. Risk Assessment Data Evaluation Report (RADER) for the Populated Areas of the Bunker Hill Superfund Site. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). August 1991 (1991a). Record of Decision, Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Residential Soils Operable Unit, Shoshone County, Idaho. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). November 1991 (1991b). A Guide to Principal Threat and Low Level Threat Wastes. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 1992. Record of Decision (ROD), Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex, Shoshone County, Idaho. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 1995. Profile of the Metal Mining Industry. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). January 1996 (1996a). Explanation of Significant Differences for Revised Remedial Actions at the Bunker Hill Superfund Site, Shoshone County, Idaho. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 3, 1996 (1996b). Amendment to the Record of Decision for the Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex (Non-Populated Areas) Superfund Site. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). January 1998 (1998a). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 — Human Health Evaluation Manual. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). April 1998 (1998b). Explanation of Significant Differences for Revised Remedial Actions at the Bunker Hill Superfund Site OU 2, Shoshone County, Idaho. B16-4
SITE INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR NATIONAL REMEDY REVIEW BOARD PART B, SECTION 16: REFERENCES U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). February 2000 (2000a). Bunker Hill Populated Areas Operable Unit First Five-Year Review Report. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). July 2000 (2000b). A Guide to Developing and Documenting Cost Estimates during the Feasibility Study. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 2000 (2000c). First Five-Year Review of the Non-Populated Area Operable Unit Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex, Shoshone County, Idaho. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). April 2001 (2001a). Bunker Hill Mine Water Management Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). July 2001 (2001b). National Remedy Review Board Presentation Information, Coeur d’Alene Basin Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Prepared by URS Greiner and CH2M HILL for USEPA Region 10. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 2001 (2001c). Final (Revision 2) Remedial Investigation Report, Coeur d’Alene Basin Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Prepared by URS Greiner and CH2M HILL for USEPA Region 10. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). October 2001 (2001d). Final (Revision 2) Feasibility Study Report, Coeur d’Alene Basin Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Prepared by URS Greiner and CH2M HILL for USEPA Region 10. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). December 10, 2001 (2001e). Record of Decision Amendment: Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Acid Mine Drainage, Smelterville, Idaho. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 2002. Record of Decision, The Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Operable Unit 3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). March 26, 2004. Basin Environmental Monitoring Plan, Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Operable Unit 3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). October 2005. Five-Year Review Report: Second Five-Year Review for the Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site, Operable Units 1, 2, and 3, Idaho and Washington. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). October 2006. OU 2 Environmental Monitoring Plan, Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex, Shoshone County, Idaho. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). October 1, 2007. A Predictive Analysis of Post-Remediation Metals Loading. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). September 2009. Draft Data Summary Report for the Coeur d’Alene Basin Remedial Action Monitoring Program. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). February 2010. Draft Focused Feasibility Study Report, Upper Basin of the Coeur d’Alene River, Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site. B16-5
Page 1 and 2:
United States Environmental Protect
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations
Page 5 and 6:
SITE INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR NATION
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Acronyms and Abbreviations µg/dL m
Page 11 and 12:
RAO remedial action objective RI/FS
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
1. Site Name, Location, and Brief H
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
5. Current and Potential Future Sit
Page 49 and 50:
6. Summary of Risks The Bunker Hill
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
8. Description of Alternatives The
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: SITE INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR NATION
Page 65 and 66: Remedial Alternative Description SI
Page 85 and 86: 12. Potential Applicable or Relevan
Page 93 and 94: COMMISSIONERS: PFfifiY WHITF CLERK
Page 95 and 96: Dan Opalski, U.S. EPA March 10,2010
Page 97 and 98: Dan Opalski, U.S. EPA March 10, 201
Page 99: Dan Opalski, U.S. EPA March 10,2010
Page 118 and 119: Rose Lake ll n e §¨¦ 90 DUDLEY "
Page 120 and 121: 1992-1994 Removal of tailings and c
Page 122 and 123: The box plot shows the median or 50
Page 124 and 125: ! ( ! ! ( ! ! ! Upper Basin Coeur d
Page 126 and 127: DUDLEY ") §¨¦ 90 ") St Joe River
Page 128 and 129: Base Map Data: NHDPlus (Rivers, Wat
Page 130 and 131: [Two Updated Updated Woodland Ecolo
Page 132 and 133: Ninemile Creek WALLACE BUNN Upper B
Page 134 and 135: OSBURN §¨¦ 90 Upper Basin Coeur
Page 136 and 137: 176 E Upper Basin Coeur d'Alene Riv
Page 138 and 139: §¨¦ 90 ENAVILLE The Bunker Hill
Page 140 and 141: E 169 §¨¦ 90 Upper Basin Coeur d
Page 142 and 143: TABLE B2-1 Summary of Ongoing Data
Page 144 and 145: TABLE B4-2 Screening Level Exceedan
Page 146 and 147: TABLE B7-1 Preliminary Remediation
Page 148 and 149: TABLE B8-1 Descriptions of Typical
Page 150 and 151: TABLE B8-2 Summary of Alternatives
Page 152 and 153: TABLE B9-1a Comparative Analysis of
Page 158 and 159: TABLE B9-1b Comparative Analysis of
Page 164 and 165:
TABLE B11-1 Legend of Bureau of Lan
Page 166 and 167:
TABLE B11-1 Legend of Bureau of Lan
Page 168 and 169:
TABLE B11-2 Summary of Estimated Po
Page 170 and 171:
TABLE B11-4 Summary of Remedy Prote
Page 172 and 173:
TABLE B14-1 Estimated Costs Summari
Page 174 and 175:
TABLE B14-2 Summary of Estimated Co
Page 176:
TABLE B14-2 Summary of Estimated Co
show all

Final Site Information Package for National Remedy Review Board ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?