European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

The Assesment of Participation Decisionmaking of Head Nurses 357
Table 2: frequency distribution of cases according participation of decision making at the training hospitals of
Iran University of medical sciences 2005
Participation of decision making measure Number %
Never (12-21.5) 10 10.6
Low(21.6-31.1) 32 34
Middle (31.2-40.7) 38 40.4
Much (40.8-50.3) 10 10.6
Very much (50.4-60) 4 4.4
Total 94 100
SD = 0.46 X = 2.64
Maximum=5 Minimum=1
Table 3: frequency distribution of case according subjects partnership at the training hospital in Iran University
of medical sciences
Never Low Middle Much Very
much
total X
N % N % N % N % N % N %
Safety and occupational health 3 3.2 15 16 32 34 34 36.2 10 10.6 92 100 3.35±0/98
Work rotation 1 101 8 8.5 31 33 42 44.7 12 12.7 94 100 3/35±0/86
Use of new technical 3 3.2 15 16 30 31.9 38 40.4 8 8.5 94 100 3/60±1/06
Use of opportunity Job 10 10.6 26 27.7 34 32.6 18 19.1 6 6.4 94 100 2/16±1/06
Humans & financial resources 27 28.7 39 41.5 19 20.2 4 4.3 5 53 94 100 2/17±0/98
Creation of facilities welfares 34 36.2 27 28.7 20 21.2 9 9.6 4 4.3 94 100 2/17±1/15
Training programs & promotion 5 5.3 17 18.1 42 44.7 22 23.4 8 8.5 94 100 3/12±0/98
Organization 13 13.8 23 24.5 36 38.3 15 16 7 7.4 94 100 2/79±1/11
Allocation budget 45 47.9 32 34 13 13.8 1 1/1 3 3.2 94 100 1/78±0/95
Strategies 17 18 34 36.2 29 30.9 12 12.8 2 2.1 94 100 2.45±1
Goals appointment 7 7.4 25 26.6 41 43.6 16 17.1 5 5.3 94 100 2.86±0/89
Equipment purchase 20 21.3 18 19.2 35 37.2 13 13.8 8 8.5 94 100 2.69±1/20
Conclusion
For the receive to first aim it means determine the rate participation of decision making of the head
nurses the rate show the most percent of head nurses 40.4% answers that the average of participation
are the middle average X = 2.64±0.96
Michailova (2000) believes that the managers almost oppose to participate of employees at the
decision making process. At the survey that lever (2001) done, he report that 76.3% of manages the
rate of participation be decreased but they inclination to participation of decision making. At the
Harmon (2002) studies 45.3% of answers report that the rate of participation were at the middle rang.
For the receive to second aim it means determine the rate of participation of decision making
the head nurses According participate subjects show that the most distinction average participation of
decision making head nurses relative to employees training programs are 3.12±0.98 and the last
distinction average participation of decision making related to allocation X =1.78±0.95. also 44.7% of
head nurses told that the rate of participation of training programs at the middle average. And 5.3% of
them told they never participation of decision making about training programs.
Rahnavard (2000) said the most rate participation told this matter that employees have more
interested for participation of decision making at the training programs in the job environment, that it
has direct effect on the works and the descriptive about the least participate is about allocation budget
perhaps the reasons is that allocation budget relate to upper class mangers and the policy and
unapparent native of budget process.
The result of analysis data show that one variable (hospital manner) related to participation of
discoing making X 2 =5.735 , df=2 , P=