30.12.2012 Views

European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

453 Md. Shahadat Hossain and Gouri Rani Banik<br />

Eucalyptus camaldulensis<br />

The regression equation for total was found organic carbon content (kg/tree) was found Y= -6.113 +<br />

3.363X1 + 2.142X2. Here Y represents the total organic carbon content (kg) <strong>of</strong> tree, X1 represents the<br />

height (m) and X2 represents the diameter at breast height (cm). From the equation it implies that the<br />

total organic carbon content is increased by 3.363 kg for per unit increase in height and 2.142 kg for<br />

per unit increase <strong>of</strong> DBH. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> determination (r 2 ) is 0.980 and the relationship was<br />

significant at P>0.01. The result showed a strong positive correlation between height along with DBH<br />

and total organic carbon content <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

In the present study it was found that both DBH (cm) and height (m) relating to total organic<br />

carbon was produced higher coefficient <strong>of</strong> determination (r 2 ) for Dipterocarpus turbinatus (0.973)<br />

Acacia auriculiformis (0.974) and Eucalyptus camaldulensis (0.980) than equations considering<br />

individual parameter viz height or DBH. So the result revealed that both DBH and height is the best<br />

predictor <strong>of</strong> total organic carbon measurement. This trend was found similar with the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study by Chowdhury, 2005 for Acacia auriduliformis, (0.932) Acacia mangium (0.966), Artocarpus<br />

heterophyllus, (0.968) Gmelina arborea (0.956) and Lagerstroemia speciosa (0.996).<br />

Total organic carbon sequestration (tonne/ha/year) <strong>of</strong> the studied species<br />

Among the studied species it was found that annual organic carbon sequestration (tonne/ha/year) rate<br />

was maximum in case <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus camaldulensis (9.50 tonne/ha/year) and minimum in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Dipterocarpus turbinatus (3.04 tonne/ha/year). The rate <strong>of</strong> organic carbon sequestration <strong>of</strong> Acacia<br />

auriculiformis was found 8.91 tonne/ha/year. From the figure it is found that although D. turbinatus<br />

has a significant difference between organic carbon accumulation rate with that <strong>of</strong> A. auriculiformis<br />

and E. camaldulensis but there is no significant difference between organic carbon accumulation rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> A. auriculiformis and that <strong>of</strong> E. camaldulensis.<br />

As E. camaldulensis and A. auriculiformis are fast growing species, their annual biomass<br />

production rate is higher than that <strong>of</strong> D. turbinatus which ultimately results the higher amount <strong>of</strong><br />

organic carbon per year in the former two species than that <strong>of</strong> latter one.<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> individuals per hectares was found higher in E. camaldulensis than that <strong>of</strong> D.<br />

turbinatus and A. auriculiformis. As amount <strong>of</strong> biomass from which we calculate organic carbon is<br />

directly related to the growing stock, for E. camaldulensis organic carbon accumulation rate per<br />

hectare was found higher. For the same reason higher rate <strong>of</strong> organic carbon accumulation was found<br />

in A. auriculiformis than D. turbinatus . Another reason for higher rate <strong>of</strong> organic carbon accumulation<br />

rate for A, auriculiformis and E. camaldulensis studied plantation sites <strong>of</strong> these two species were<br />

comparatively lower aged. At the early stage <strong>of</strong> plantations biomass accumulation rate is higher (Pant,<br />

1990). As Organic carbon accumulation is related to biomass accumulation therefore higher the<br />

biomass accumulation rate, higher the carbon accumulation rate. Some results <strong>of</strong> previous study could<br />

be mentioned here to compare the present findings with previous outcomes.<br />

D. turbinatus plantation accumulated less amount <strong>of</strong> organic carbon (including biomass and<br />

soil carbon) annually compared to that <strong>of</strong> A. auriculiformis. The biomass carbon content was also<br />

found highest in A. auriculiformis (Karmakar 2002).<br />

Another similar result was found in the study conducted by Osman et al., 1992 considering<br />

above ground biomass <strong>of</strong> 4, 5 and 8 years old A. auriculiformis & Pinus caribaea, A. auriculiformis<br />

and D. turbinatus, respectively in the Chittagong University.<br />

A study was conducted to assess the carbon stock in the 11-years old Aphanamixis polystachya<br />

(1991) in Chittagong University campus and it was reported that on an average 239 tonne (i.e 139 /11<br />

= 21.73 tonne/ha/year) carbon was stored in the biomass <strong>of</strong> the trees per hectare (Miah et al., 2001).<br />

The total dry biomass produced in 38 years old Tectona grandis in Uttar Pradesh was 130 tonne/ha<br />

(Kaul et al., 1979). If the biomass is converted to biomass carbon content, it will be 65 tonne/ha i.e. is<br />

slightly less than the biomass carbon content in studied D. turbinatus plantation <strong>of</strong> 27 years old

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!