European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Nutritive Evaluation of Some Trees and Browse Species from Scotland 314 Results and Discussion Table 1 shows the in vitro gas production characteristics of the different Scottish forage species. As expected, gas production increased with the duration/length of incubation (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Species and PEG had significant effect on in vitro gas production (P L. perenne > F. sylvatica >A. pseudoplatanus > C. angustifolium > C. vulgaris J. effusus > P. sylvestris > L. sylvatica > P. menziesii > P. sitchensis >V. myrtillusi. There was no significant difference in gas production of L. perenne and A. pseudoplatanus and also P.sylvestris and J. effuses at the 96hr . There was significant increase in gas production with the addition of PEG (P
315 Odeyinka, S.M, Hector, B.L and Ørskov, E.R Gas Production (ml) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 1: In vitro gas production of the leaves of Scottish plant species 0 20 40 60 80 100 Hours Table 2: Effect of PEG on in vitro gas production of Scottish plants Fagus sylvatica Brassica oleraceae Pseudotsuga menziesii Lolium perenne Calluna vulgaris Chamaenerion angustifolium Luzula sylvatica Pinus sylvestris Picea sitchensis Acer pseudoplatanus Vaccinium myrtillus Juncus effusus Time, h Species s 3 6 12 24 48 72 96 Fagus sylvatica 3.56 a 6.87 a 11.70 a 21.75 a 33.69 a 36.03 a 37.38 a Fagus sylvatica + PEG 4.86 b 9.75 b 15.58 b 26.30 b 33.90 a 40.12 b 42.86 b Brassica oleraceae 7.92 a 18.11 a 34.81 a 46.98 a 55.75 a 59.15 a 60.85 a Brassica oleraceae + PEG 7.93 a 19.09 b 36.71 b 49.05 b 57.56 b 61.38 b 63.44 b Pseudotsuga menziesii 2.45 a 6.01 a 12.17 a 18.89 a 23.07 a 25.43 a 25.98 a Pseudotsuga menziesii+PEG 4.05 b 8.66 b 14.76 b 21.15 b 25.29 b 27.09 b 27.09 b Lolium perenne 3.80 a 9.10 a 21.10 a 31.74 a 39.80 a 43.30 a 44.90 a Lolium perenne + PEG 3.81 a 9.53 a 21.93 a 33.53 a 41.23 a 44.13 a 45.22 a Calluna vulgaris 3.30 a 6.90 a 12.57 a 22.38 a 27.43 a 29.54 a 30.92 a Calluna vulgaris + PEG 4.31 b 9.19 b 15.28 b 25.97 b 30.65 b 31.64 b 32.98 b Chamaenerion angustifolium 2.21 a 4.44 a 10.14 a 19.18 a 23.98 a 25.82 a 26.10 a Chamaenerion angustifolium + PEG 3.02 b 6.89 b 15.58 b 25.39 b 32.08 b 34.46 b 34.74 b Luzula sylvatica 2.69 a 5.67 a 11.22 a 19.48 a 24.96 a 27.56 a 28.37 a Luzula sylvatica EG 3.04 a 6.38 a 12.63 a 21.38 a 26.45 a 28.85 a 29.68 a Pinus sylvestris 2.75 a 5.80 a 12.30 a 21.85 a 26.63 a 27.91 a 28.46 a Pinus sylvestris PEG 3.27 b 6.83 b 13.54 b 22.99 b 27.99 b 29.54 b 30.35 b Picea sitchensis 2.97 a 6.23 a 10.18 a 16.04 a 19.91 a 20.90 a 21.44 a Picea sitchensis + PEG 4.07 b 8.71 b 14.85 b 19.92 b 23.27 b 24.81 b 24.81 b Acer pseudoplatanus 2.46 a 4.66 a 8.65 a 18.39 a 32.74 a 41.34 a 45.24 a Acer pseudoplatanus + PEG 2.73 b 4.67 a 8.66 a 18.42 a 32.96 a 41.40 a 45.44 a Vaccinum myrtillus 1.86 a 4.27 a 8.67 a 14.42 a 18.76 a 20.53 a 21.06 a Vaccinum myrtillus + PEG 2.69 b 6.75 b 13.10 b 19.75 b 23.87 b 25.94 b 26.48 b Juncus effusus 1.08 a 2.73 a 5.60 a 16.36 a 26.75 a 34.79 a 37.50 a Juncus effuses + PEG 1.10 a 3.04 a 6.49 b 18.74 b 31.18 b 37.12 b 39.59 b SE Difference 0.09 0.15 0.23 0.32 0.47 0.51 0.53 Means with different superscripts for the same species in the same column and the same hour are statistically different (P L. perenne >A. pseudoplatanus
Page 1 and 2: European Journal of Scientific Rese
Page 3 and 4: appropriate. Manuscripts may be rej
Page 5: A Comparative Analysis of Gibberell
Page 8 and 9: Nutritive Evaluation of Some Trees
Page 16 and 17: Determination of Sample Size 320 mi
Page 18 and 19: Determination of Sample Size 322 sa
Page 20 and 21: Determination of Sample Size 324 [2
Page 24 and 25: 328 Amin Yazdanpanah Goharrizi and
Page 30 and 31: Investigation of Complex Formation
Page 36 and 37: Germination Studies in Selected Nat
Page 44 and 45: 348 Moronkola, O.A and Aladesanyi,
Page 52 and 53: 356 Maryam Nooritajer, Faezeh Nouro
Page 54 and 55: 358 Maryam Nooritajer, Faezeh Nouro
Page 56 and 57: Aetiology and Epidemiology of Sever
Page 58 and 59: Aetiology and Epidemiology of Sever
Page 60 and 61:
Aetiology and Epidemiology of Sever
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
European Journal of Scientific Rese
Page 70 and 71:
374 Nazenin Ruso cultures for Turki
Page 72 and 73:
376 Nazenin Ruso b) Literate/ Illit
Page 74 and 75:
378 Nazenin Ruso thinking of God”
Page 76 and 77:
380 Nazenin Ruso Our mosques capaci
Page 78 and 79:
382 Nazenin Ruso The last pie chart
Page 80 and 81:
384 Nazenin Ruso will be free to do
Page 82 and 83:
386 Nazenin Ruso note at this point
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
390 Amani Michel Kouassi, Koffi Fer
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Seedling Growth of Gmelina Arborea
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
A Comparative Analysis of Gibberell
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Research of the Characteristics of
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
428 Nooritawati Md Tahir, Aini Huss
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
436 Rahman G.A, Alabi.B.S, Afolabi.
Page 134 and 135:
438 Rahman G.A, Alabi.B.S, Afolabi.
Page 136 and 137:
Health Impact Assessement of Multin
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Development of Organic Carbon Seque
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
show all

European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?