IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ...
IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ... IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ...
17 th International Congress on Nitrogen Fixation Fremantle, Western Australia 27 November – 1 December 2011 Session Details: Wednesday 30 November 2011 Concurrent Session 15 – Quantification of N-Fixation 1600 – 1740 Authors: Georg Carlsson 1 & Kerstin Huss-Danell 2 1 Department of Agrosystems, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden. 2 Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-90183 Umeå, Sweden. Presentation Title: Does nitrogen transfer confound 15 N-based quantifications of N2 fixation? Presentation Time: 1600 – 1620 Nitrogen transfer between neighbouring plants is a well-known phenomenon, mediated via e.g. rhizodeposition and mycorrhizae. Transfer of fixed N from legumes to non-legume reference plants has been suggested to confound N2 fixation estimates obtained by the 15N natural abundance and isotope dilution methods, because a reference plant taking up fixed N will supposedly not correctly reflect the 15 N signature of plant-available soil N. On the other hand, experiments using direct leaf-feeding of 15 N, which allows for direct detection of N transfer with high precision, have shown that N transfer also occurs in the direction from non-legume to legume. In order to establish whether N transfer causes problems in N2 fixation measurements with 15 N-based methods when using reference plants grown together with the legume, we labelled both legumes and non-legumes with 15 N and performed detailed measurements of N transfer in mixed plant communities in the field, including measurements of potential N transfer from legume to legume. N transfer occurred in all directions: from legume to non-legume, from non-legume to legume and from legume to legume. These results, together with analyses of previously published data on N transfer, were used to calculate nitrogen fixation with different N transfer scenarios, showing the effects of using reference plants in mixture with the legume versus in pure stand. We conclude that the most important mechanism of N transfer is likely to be indirect, via rhizodeposition and litter degradation, and that fixed N transferred to neighbouring reference plants also modifies the 15 N signature of the soil N available to the N2fixing legume. This provides strong support for using reference plants growing as close as possible to the N2fixing legume for reliable N2 fixation quantifications. 92 2011
17 th International Congress on Nitrogen Fixation Fremantle, Western Australia 27 November – 1 December 2011 Session Details: Wednesday 30 November 2011 Concurrent Session 15 – Quantification of N-Fixation 1600 – 1740 Authors: Xinhua He 1, 2, 3, 4 , Christa Critchley 4 , Caroline Bledsoe 5 1, 2 State Centre of Excellence for Ecohydrology, Centre for Ecosystem Management, 1 School of Natural Resources, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6207, Australia 2 School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 3 Key Laboratory of Crop Nutrition and Fertilization, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China 4 School of Agriculture & Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia 5 Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA Presentation Title: Reciprocal two-way n ( 15 NH4 or 15 NO3) transfer between non-N2-fixer Eucalyptus maculata and Frankia N2-fixer Casuarina cunninghamiana Presentation Time: 1620 – 1640 Nitrogen (N) movement or transfer from one plant to another could have important implications for nutrient cycling and eco-physiological significance in terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems. In controlled pots with or without Frankia inoculation to Casuarina, two-way N transfers through an ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus sp. were examined by excluding root contact and supplying 15 NH4 + or 15 NO3 � to 5 or 11-month-old Eucalyptus maculata or Casuarina cunninghamiana pairs grown in 2-chambered-pots separated by 37 µm nylon screens. With either Eucalyptus or Casuarina as the N-donor, the three pairs were non-nodulated nonmycorrhizal/nonmycorrhizal, non-nodulated mycorrhizas/mycorrhizal and nodulated mycorrhizal/mycorrhizal. Using an environmental scanning electron microscope, living mycorrhizal hyphae were observed to interconnect Eucalyptus and Casuarina. Results showed that N2-fixation supplied ~35% of the N in Casuarina and was enhanced by mycorrhization, which was 67% in Eucalyptus and 36% in Casuarina. Biomass, N and 15 N contents were lowest in the non-mycorrhizal and greatest in the nodulated/mycorrhizal plants. Nitrogen transfer was enhanced by nodulation and/or mycorrhization, and greater when N was supplied as 15 NH4 + than 15 NO3 � . Nitrogen transfer from either 15 N-source was lowest in the non-mycorrhizal treatment and greatest in the nodulated mycorrhizal treatment, and also was greater to Casuarina than to Eucalyptus and where NH4 + than NO3 � supplied. Irrespective of the 15 N-source and of whether Casuarina or Eucalyptus was the N sink, net N transfer was low and similar in non-nodulated treatments, but was much greater when Casuarina was the N sink in the nodulated mycorrhizal treatment. High-N-demand by Casuarina resulted in greater net N transfer from the less N-demand Eucalyptus. Net N transfer from a non-N2-fixing to an N2-fixing plant may reflect the very high N demand of N2-fixing species. Our research may provide insights into our understanding of complex interactions among plants, Frankia, mycorrhizal fungi, and soil resources in both terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems. 93 2011
- Page 42 and 43: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 44 and 45: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 46 and 47: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 48 and 49: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 50 and 51: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 52 and 53: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 54 and 55: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 56 and 57: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 58 and 59: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 60 and 61: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 62 and 63: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 64 and 65: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 66 and 67: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 68 and 69: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 70 and 71: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 72 and 73: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 74 and 75: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 76 and 77: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 78 and 79: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 80 and 81: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 82 and 83: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 84 and 85: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 86 and 87: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 88 and 89: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 90 and 91: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 94 and 95: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 96 and 97: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 98 and 99: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 100 and 101: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 102 and 103: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 104 and 105: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 106 and 107: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 108 and 109: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 110 and 111: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 112 and 113: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 114 and 115: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 116 and 117: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 118 and 119: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 120 and 121: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 122 and 123: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 124 and 125: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 126 and 127: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 128 and 129: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 130 and 131: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 132 and 133: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 134 and 135: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 136 and 137: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 138 and 139: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 140 and 141: 17 th International Congress on Nit
17 th <strong>International</strong> Congress on <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Fixation</strong><br />
Fremantle, Western Australia<br />
27 November – 1 December 2011<br />
Session Details: Wednesday 30 November 2011<br />
Concurrent Session 15 – Quantification of N-<strong>Fixation</strong><br />
1600 – 1740<br />
Authors: Xinhua He 1, 2, 3, 4 , Christa Critchley 4 , Caroline Bledsoe 5<br />
1, 2 State Centre of Excellence for Ecohydrology, Centre for Ecosystem Management,<br />
1 School of Natural Resources, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6207, Australia<br />
2 School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia<br />
3 Key Laboratory of Crop Nutrition and Fertilization, Institute of Agricultural Resources<br />
and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081,<br />
China<br />
4 School of Agriculture & Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072<br />
Australia<br />
5 Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA<br />
95616 USA<br />
Presentation Title: Reciprocal two-way n ( 15 NH4 or 15 NO3) transfer between non-N2-fixer Eucalyptus<br />
maculata and Frankia N2-fixer Casuarina cunninghamiana<br />
Presentation Time: 1620 – 1640<br />
<strong>Nitrogen</strong> (N) movement or transfer from one plant to another could have important implications for nutrient<br />
cycling and eco-physiological significance in terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems. In controlled pots with or<br />
without Frankia inoculation to Casuarina, two-way N transfers through an ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus sp.<br />
were examined by excluding root contact and supplying 15 NH4 + or 15 NO3 � to 5 or 11-month-old Eucalyptus<br />
maculata or Casuarina cunninghamiana pairs grown in 2-chambered-pots separated by 37 µm nylon screens.<br />
With either Eucalyptus or Casuarina as the N-donor, the three pairs were non-nodulated nonmycorrhizal/nonmycorrhizal,<br />
non-nodulated mycorrhizas/mycorrhizal and nodulated mycorrhizal/mycorrhizal.<br />
Using an environmental scanning electron microscope, living mycorrhizal hyphae were observed to interconnect<br />
Eucalyptus and Casuarina. Results showed that N2-fixation supplied ~35% of the N in Casuarina and was<br />
enhanced by mycorrhization, which was 67% in Eucalyptus and 36% in Casuarina. Biomass, N and 15 N contents<br />
were lowest in the non-mycorrhizal and greatest in the nodulated/mycorrhizal plants. <strong>Nitrogen</strong> transfer was<br />
enhanced by nodulation and/or mycorrhization, and greater when N was supplied as 15 NH4 + than 15 NO3 � .<br />
<strong>Nitrogen</strong> transfer from either 15 N-source was lowest in the non-mycorrhizal treatment and greatest in the<br />
nodulated mycorrhizal treatment, and also was greater to Casuarina than to Eucalyptus and where NH4 + than<br />
NO3 � supplied. Irrespective of the 15 N-source and of whether Casuarina or Eucalyptus was the N sink, net N<br />
transfer was low and similar in non-nodulated treatments, but was much greater when Casuarina was the N sink<br />
in the nodulated mycorrhizal treatment. High-N-demand by Casuarina resulted in greater net N transfer from the<br />
less N-demand Eucalyptus. Net N transfer from a non-N2-fixing to an N2-fixing plant may reflect the very high N<br />
demand of N2-fixing species. Our research may provide insights into our understanding of complex interactions<br />
among plants, Frankia, mycorrhizal fungi, and soil resources in both terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems.<br />
93<br />
2011