IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ...
IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ... IN INOCULANTS Nodulaid - 17th International Nitrogen Fixation ...
17 th International Congress on Nitrogen Fixation Fremantle, Western Australia 27 November – 1 December 2011 Title Phylogenetic position of Rhizobium galegae Authors Seyed Abdollah Mousavi 1 , Janina Österman 1 , Lars Paulin 2 & Kristina Lindström 1 Poster Board Number 31 1 Department of Food and Environmental Sciences 2 Institute of Biotechnology Rhizobia are defined as bacteria that can enter nitrogen-fixing symbioses by inducing nodules in legumes (Lindström & Mousavi 2010), whilst agrobacteria induce tumours in plants. Rhizobium galegae is fixing nitrogen in Galega plants, and is one of the species of the family Rhizobiaceae. The phylogenetic placement of R. galegae is not stable in phylogenetic trees of rhizobia and it does not fit with most other rhizobia in some gene trees. R. galegae was e.g. placed in the Rhizobium rhizogenes - Rhizobium cluster in dnaK nucleotide sequence trees; whereas it was placed with Agrobacterium species in the 16S rRNA tree (Eradly at al 2005). Construction ofa concatenated tree of eight housekeeping genes, recA, dnaK, thrC, gltA, rpoB, atpD, pnp and gyrB, for twenty whole-genome sequenced rhizobia and agrobacteria showed that R. galegae could be placed in a cluster with A. vitis and A. tumefaciens, whereas Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 (formerly A. radiobacter K84) was situated in the Rhizbium clade, wihch included R. etli and R. leguminosarum. To get a robust estimate of the phylogenetic placement of R. galegae, four house-keeping genes (recA, thrC, atpD and rpoB), and glnA and glnII genes of forty-four strains of R. galegae and more than forty strains of related rhizobia and agrobacteria were sequenced. Results of Multilocus Sequence Analysis of rhizobia and agrobacteria will be presented. Eardly BD, Nour SM, van Berkum P & Selander RK (2005) Rhizobial 16S rRNA and dnaK genes: Mosaicism and the Uncertain Phylogenetic Placement of Rhizobium galegae, Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 1328-1335. Lindström K & Mousavi SA (2010) Rhizobium and Other N-fixing Symbioses. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021157. 146 2011
17 th International Congress on Nitrogen Fixation Fremantle, Western Australia 27 November – 1 December 2011 Title Study on soybean nodule symbiosome membrane localised transporters Authors Chen C., Loughlin P., Day D., Smith P. Poster Board Number 32 In nodules, the symbiosome membrane (SM) shares properties of both the plasma membrane and vacuolar membrane, however the unique nature of the SM suggests specific mechanism(s) for targeting proteins is essential. Recent work has indentified the first 24 amino acids from the N-terminus of a Medicago symbiosome protein as an address label (signal peptide) for its targeting (Hohjnec et al., 2009), however this signal peptide is not present on many known SM proteins. We are focusing on clarifying the targeting mechanism of soybean nodule SM-localised GmZIP1 (zinc transporter) and GmYSL1 (iron transporter). In silico analysis predicts the first 28 amino acids of GmZIP1 may be a signal peptide. Full length GmZIP1 with GFP fused internally, immediately after the last predicted transmembrane domain is targeted to the SM. Deletion of the predicted signal peptide appears to disrupt the expression and/or localization of the fusion protein. GmYSL1 is not predicted to have an N-terminal signal peptide and N-terminal fusion of GFP does not disrupt its SM localisation. We are currently examining the localisation of a C-terminally truncated GmYSL1 construct to determine whether this is important for SM targeting. Furthermore we have characterised 4 novel soybean promoters that can drive high and specific expression in soybean nodule infected cells. Role of other soybean ZIP homologues are being characterised through expression, function and localisation studies to elucidate the zinc transporter family. 147 2011
- Page 96 and 97: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 98 and 99: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 100 and 101: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 102 and 103: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 104 and 105: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 106 and 107: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 108 and 109: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 110 and 111: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 112 and 113: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 114 and 115: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 116 and 117: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 118 and 119: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 120 and 121: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 122 and 123: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 124 and 125: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 126 and 127: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 128 and 129: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 130 and 131: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 132 and 133: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 134 and 135: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 136 and 137: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 138 and 139: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 140 and 141: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 142 and 143: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 144 and 145: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 148 and 149: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 150 and 151: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 152 and 153: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 154 and 155: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 156 and 157: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 158 and 159: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 160 and 161: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 162 and 163: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 164 and 165: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 166 and 167: 17 th International Congress on Nit
- Page 168 and 169: 17 th International Congress on Nit
17 th <strong>International</strong> Congress on <strong>Nitrogen</strong> <strong>Fixation</strong><br />
Fremantle, Western Australia<br />
27 November – 1 December 2011<br />
Title Study on soybean nodule symbiosome membrane localised transporters<br />
Authors Chen C., Loughlin P., Day D., Smith P.<br />
Poster Board Number 32<br />
In nodules, the symbiosome membrane (SM) shares properties of both the plasma membrane and vacuolar<br />
membrane, however the unique nature of the SM suggests specific mechanism(s) for targeting proteins is<br />
essential. Recent work has indentified the first 24 amino acids from the N-terminus of a Medicago symbiosome<br />
protein as an address label (signal peptide) for its targeting (Hohjnec et al., 2009), however this signal peptide is<br />
not present on many known SM proteins. We are focusing on clarifying the targeting mechanism of soybean<br />
nodule SM-localised GmZIP1 (zinc transporter) and GmYSL1 (iron transporter). In silico analysis predicts the first<br />
28 amino acids of GmZIP1 may be a signal peptide. Full length GmZIP1 with GFP fused internally, immediately<br />
after the last predicted transmembrane domain is targeted to the SM. Deletion of the predicted signal peptide<br />
appears to disrupt the expression and/or localization of the fusion protein. GmYSL1 is not predicted to have an<br />
N-terminal signal peptide and N-terminal fusion of GFP does not disrupt its SM localisation. We are currently<br />
examining the localisation of a C-terminally truncated GmYSL1 construct to determine whether this is important<br />
for SM targeting. Furthermore we have characterised 4 novel soybean promoters that can drive high and specific<br />
expression in soybean nodule infected cells. Role of other soybean ZIP homologues are being characterised<br />
through expression, function and localisation studies to elucidate the zinc transporter family.<br />
147<br />
2011