Newsletter_07-2024_EN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Interview by Cristina Masciola, AM Instruments – Marketing & Communication Manager Cleaning & Disinfection according to new Annex 1: An interview with Tim Sandle “For disinfection to be effective, prior cleaning to remove surface contamination should be performed. Cleaning programmes should effectively remove disinfectant residues. More than one type of disinfecting agent should be employed to ensure that where they have different modes of action, their combined usage is effective against bacteria and fungi. Disinfection should include the periodic use of a sporicidal agent.” Once again, we spoke to Tim Sandle, microbiologist, author and science journalist, known as one of the leading experts in the field, to discuss in the most appropriate way what challenges the pharmaceutical industry is facing in adapting cleaning & disinfection to the Annex 1 requirements. Rotation of disinfectants The latest version of Annex 1 adds in paragraph 4.33: “more than one type of disinfecting agent should be employed to ensure that where they have different modes of action, their combined usage is effective against bacteria and fungi”. Thus, it seems that more products effective against bacteria and fungi should be used in addition to a sporicidal agent. Is the two-product rotation (one bactericide/fungicide and one sporicide) – already in use by many pharmaceutical companies – acceptable? When cleanroom disinfectants are selected many users opt to select two or more disinfectants. If a sporicide is a regularly used agent, then two disinfectants should be sufficient. Rotation is important for several reasons: – Most disinfectants do not have a complete spectrum of activity effective against all microorganisms (spectrum of activity is the ability of the disinfectant to kill different types of microorganisms and microorganisms which are in different physiological states). The disinfectants commonly used are often effective against vegetative cells but are not sporicidal. To maintain an effective contamination control, the elimination of bacterial endospores through a sporicidal disinfectant is recommended (these are sometimes referred to as high-level disinfectants). Here a sporicide would be used in rotation with a non-sporicidal disinfectant. – The disinfectants with the formulations which are effective against the greatest range of microorganisms are often expensive. With this, many manufacturers use a general broad-spectrum disinfectant daily or weekly with a sporicidal disinfectant used weekly or monthly (a decision often based on the results of microbiological environmental monitoring and the characterization of the isolated microorganisms). – Some disinfectants, such as sporicides, are corrosive. While the risk to surfaces can be reduced through rinsing, rotation is sometimes undertaken in order to reduce the risk of damage to cleanroom equipment and working benches. – Rotating two disinfectants can also reduce the possibility of resistant strains of microorganisms developing. Whilst the phenomenon of microbial resistance is an issue of major concern for antibiotics there are few data to support development of resistance to disinfectant. Nonetheless, it remains a regulatory expectation. Thus, the reasons for rotation are approached from either a desire to widen the mode of action or to address anticipated regulatory concerns. Effective cleaning & disinfection Cleaning and disinfection affect floors, walls, ceilings, but also machinery and equipment, and often hard-to-reach surfaces. Which cleaning and disinfection methods are most effective in this respect? These depends on the circumstances, however good application techniques are important, for example with floor cleaning and disinfection: – Either roll all of the floor surface with a tacky roller to remove any loose debris and fibers, moving any equipment to one half of the room nearest exit door, or wipe the floor using a neutral detergent solution and mop and bucket. – Use a use disinfectant impregnated mop wipes and mops (alter- www.reinraum.de | www.cleanroom-online.com NEWSLETTER | Edition EN 07-2024 page 4/28
natively a mop with a ready prepared disinfectant solution could be used). – Using overlapping mop strokes, wipe down half the floor area, working methodically around the area starting at furthest reach point and working towards yourself in a straight line. Replace the mop wipe if the wipe becomes visibly contaminated or dry. – NOTE: Particular attention should be paid to corners and edges. – Leave the disinfectant solution on the surface for the manufacturer’s recommended contact time to allow the disinfectant to be effective. – Remove the mop head and discard to waste. – Fit a second mop head with ethanol impregnated mop wipe (alternatively a mop with a ready prepared alcohol solution could be used). – After the allotted time, using the fresh mop head wipe down using overlapping mop strokes to remove any residue, working methodically around the area starting at furthest reach point and working towards yourself in a straight line. Replace the mop wipe if the wipe becomes visibly contaminated or dry. Use of fumigation Where disinfection is difficult, is it advisable to use fumigation? Yes, and this is always advisable following events that can lead to high rates of contamination, such as maintenance works or a facility shutdown. Fumigation-based approaches are advantageous for decontaminating the inside of buildings because they are easily dispersed, penetrate into difficult to access areas, decontaminate the interior volume of the space (not only surfaces) and are less labour intensive than many spray based approaches. Optimal agents are hydrogen peroxide and chlorine dioxide. Attention needs to be paid to the concentration and dwell time, and with controlling temperature and humidity, as well as the mechanism of dispersing the fumigant. Each of these factors contributes to the overall efficacy. “The movement of material or equipment from lower grade or unclassified area to higher-grade clean areas should be subject to cleaning and disinfection commensurate with the risk and in line with the CCS.” The Contamination Control Strategy refers to risk-commensurate cleaning and disinfection. Validation The validation of detergent and disinfectant products, as well as the validation of cleaning is a very important step: what are the mandatory activities? Validation studies are broken down into three sections: suspension tests (phase 1 and 2) to evaluate the reduction of a known organism population inoculated directly into a sample of the liquid disinfectant, surface tests (phase 2) that assess a disinfectant’s ability to reduce the number of challenge organisms on an inoculated surface, and field trials (phase 3) a final assessment of the environmental monitoring data to validate the approach. Suspension methods evaluate the reduction= of a known organism population inoculated directly into a sample of the liquid disinfectant. Following inoculation and the observation of a predetermined contact time, samples of the inoculated substance are removed, neutralized and evaluated for survivors as compared to an untreated control suspension. Since the simulation of organism films on the specific environmental surface types are not accounted for in this method, it is recommended that suspension-based tests be used only for initial disinfectant screening purposes. Surface testing involves aliquoting onto a surface coupon a mix of the challenge organism and, where required, an interfering substance (such a protein, to simulate dirty conditions). The surface coupon will be fashioned from a representative surface in the cleanroom (here several different materials will require testing in order to show how the disinfectant performs). To this an amount of the test disinfectant is added. The solutions are left for the required contact time. Once the contact time has elapsed, the coupon is transferred to a neutralizer solution. Then, as with the suspension test once sufficient time has been given for neutralization, microbial survivors are assessed by plating out or filtering the disinfectant neutralizer solution using a microbial culture method. A possible array of surfaces to consider (this will be facility dependent) are: – Stainless steel – Glass – Aluminum – Epoxy – Enamel – Acrylic – Mipolam – Vinyl – Hardwood – Plastic – Plexiglas – Chromium Once the testing has been performed, a report should be generated that must conclude the disinfectant efficacy test outcome in relation to the acceptance criteria. If a disinfectant passes the test, deeming it suitable for use, cleanroom procedures must reflect the practices adopted during the qualification, such as disinfectant concentration, contact time and method of application to surfaces. The disinfectant’s final adoption must then be based on a follow-up assessment or field trial, which includes an evaluation of microbial counts and species recovered. Use of sterile concentrates “Disinfectants and detergents used in grade A and grade B areas should be sterile prior to use. Disinfectants used in grade C and D may also be required to be sterile where determined in the CCS. Where the disinfectants and detergents are diluted / prepared by the sterile product manufacturer, this should be done in a manner to prevent contamination and they should be monitored for microbial contamination. Dilutions should be kept in previously cleaned containers (and sterilized where applicable) and should only be stored for the defined period. If the disinfectants and detergents are supplied “ready-made” then results from certificates of analysis or conformance can be accepted subject to successful completion of the appropriate vendor qualification.” In-house prep: in the latest Annex 1 version there is more focus on both in-house preparation of detergents and disinfectants and on the use of WFI water. What do you think about the use of sterile concentrates in cleaning and disinfection procedures? The use of a concentrate that is made up or the use of ready-to-use solutions, is a choice of each user. Both methods are effective. www.reinraum.de | www.cleanroom-online.com NEWSLETTER | Edition EN 07-2024 page 5/28
Page 1 and 2: EN 07/24 Receiving ISO 3 cleanroom
Page 3: Quantum sensor improves process and
Page 7 and 8: Unique look behind the scenes of AT
Page 9 and 10: industry forward and at the same ti
Page 11 and 12: „Smart power technologies“ in a
Page 13 and 14: provider of measurement instruments
Page 15 and 16: National study requires new peel ap
Page 17 and 18: tion coefficient of < 1% in the ran
Page 19 and 20: Acquisition will advance Merck’s
Page 21 and 22: Viola Schäfer, Pfeiffer Vacuum Mar
Page 23 and 24: Exhibition Grounds (Copyright: DECH
Page 25 and 26: The MEDICA START-UP COMPETITION tro
Page 27 and 28: GEMÜ butterfly valves in the GEMÜ

Newsletter_07-2024_EN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?