Pittwater Life July 2024 Issue
GOVT’S BUDGET SNUB CONCERN NARRABEEN LAND IS ‘FALLING INTO LAGOON’ AVALON’S RUSKIN ‘ROW’ OVER TREES / PUBLIC ALCOHOL BAN THE WAY WE WERE / ARTISTS TRAIL / SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD...
GOVT’S BUDGET SNUB
CONCERN NARRABEEN LAND IS ‘FALLING INTO LAGOON’
AVALON’S RUSKIN ‘ROW’ OVER TREES / PUBLIC ALCOHOL BAN
THE WAY WE WERE / ARTISTS TRAIL / SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Great Ruskin tree row<br />
Community activists<br />
say they will continue<br />
their vigil to protect two<br />
mature Flooded Gums slated<br />
for felling in Ruskin Rowe at<br />
Avalon Beach.<br />
Northern Beaches Council<br />
maintains the trees need to<br />
be cut down due to safety<br />
reasons.<br />
However, protesters including<br />
<strong>Pittwater</strong> Ward Greens<br />
Councillor Miranda Korzy say<br />
their independent arborists’<br />
reports reveal the 70-year-old<br />
trees pose no safety issue.<br />
Council contractors cut<br />
down two trees on June 11<br />
before protesters intervened,<br />
giving the remaining two<br />
trees a “stay of execution”.<br />
The stand-off was entering<br />
its third week as <strong>Pittwater</strong><br />
<strong>Life</strong> went to press.<br />
“What the community is<br />
saying with this blockade<br />
is: ‘This far and no further<br />
with destruction of our tree<br />
canopy. We are drawing a line<br />
in the soil.’,” said Cr Korzy.<br />
VIGIL: Community activists say they will not give up the fight to save two<br />
mature gum trees on Ruskin Rowe after two others were felled in June.<br />
“We will maintain watch<br />
over these two trees for as<br />
long as it takes.”<br />
She said the trees were on<br />
public land, in a Heritage Conservation<br />
Area, and there had<br />
been “precious little consultation”<br />
with residents about<br />
their removal.<br />
Two separate, qualified and<br />
experienced local arborists<br />
said the council arborists’<br />
reports were flawed and the<br />
remaining two trees represented<br />
low risk, she added.\<br />
“What these two trees<br />
need is pruning and regular<br />
inspections. Even the two cut<br />
down could have been saved<br />
with that approach, the arborists<br />
have told me.”<br />
Twenty-years resident Arabella<br />
Lockhart said living with<br />
large trees was an accepted<br />
part of living on Ruskin Rowe.<br />
“I’m furious at the excuse<br />
of the trees being dangerous,”<br />
she said. “They must fall only<br />
once or twice a year, not constantly.<br />
I have replaced one or<br />
two windscreens, but I choose<br />
to wear that risk and cost,<br />
because the trees have given<br />
me so much joy.”<br />
PHOTO: NB Advocate<br />
A Council spokesperson<br />
said: “We continue to take<br />
action to protect, retain and<br />
maintain these trees so long<br />
as they are healthy and pose<br />
no risk to public safety.<br />
“We need to balance our<br />
goal of preserving trees with<br />
the need to protect the community<br />
when experts advise<br />
they pose unacceptable risks.<br />
“Earlier this year a very<br />
large branch fell from a tree on<br />
Ruskin Rowe, prompting Council<br />
to investigate. Council’s<br />
qualified arborist found that<br />
most of the trees on Ruskin<br />
Rowe were healthy and only<br />
required a trim, but four posed<br />
a serious risk and removal was<br />
recommended. An independent<br />
arborist also concluded the<br />
trees needed to be removed.”<br />
“Council will proceed with<br />
the removal of the trees to ensure<br />
the risk to public safety<br />
is resolved.” – Nigel Wall<br />
*What do you think? Tell<br />
us at readers@pittwaterlife.<br />
com.au<br />
News<br />
The Local Voice Since 1991<br />
JULY <strong>2024</strong> 9