14.06.2024 Views

THE SUBPOSTMASTER - JUNE ISSUE

June's issue of the The SubPostmaster magazine

June's issue of the The SubPostmaster magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAILBOX<br />

Your letters answered by Post Office Ltd<br />

and Jon Follenfant, NFSP Members’ Editor<br />

Postmasters need to plan for cost increases,<br />

so will we hear about remuneration increases<br />

before dipping into our own pockets?<br />

R<br />

emuneration is<br />

always a hot<br />

topic and we do<br />

see a pattern of<br />

Post Office Ltd (PO)<br />

applying increases one<br />

way or another. However,<br />

this is insufficient to cover<br />

the ever-increasing costs. I<br />

have rapidly increased my<br />

shop sales from £6k per<br />

annum to £40k but still<br />

struggle to pay the bills.<br />

Will there be an<br />

enhanced recognition that<br />

remuneration needs to<br />

increase and that<br />

communication must take<br />

place by early January next<br />

year to allow business<br />

owners to plan for the<br />

Living Wage increases?<br />

Martin Rudderham<br />

Skellow PO<br />

POST OFFICE REPLIES<br />

Paul Liddiard, Head of<br />

Postmaster<br />

Remuneration<br />

Development,<br />

writes:<br />

Thank you<br />

for your<br />

questions<br />

and I’m<br />

pleased that<br />

you have<br />

recognised the<br />

increases in<br />

remuneration.<br />

As you have stated,<br />

postmasters, like many<br />

retailers on UK high<br />

streets, are facing a very<br />

“I have<br />

increased my<br />

shop sales rapidly<br />

but still struggle<br />

to pay the<br />

bills”<br />

challenging economic<br />

landscape right now.<br />

We are committed to<br />

seeing postmasters share<br />

more in the profits we<br />

make. Postmasters now<br />

receive more than half of<br />

the variable income PO<br />

makes.<br />

At the end of March, we<br />

announced a<br />

remuneration package for<br />

postmasters worth £30<br />

million for the 2024/25<br />

financial year.<br />

As part of that, our new<br />

Operational Excellence<br />

Incentive Scheme will<br />

directly reward<br />

postmasters who deliver<br />

strong performance in<br />

certain back-office<br />

activities. In turn, this also<br />

helps to save money that<br />

is then available to use<br />

elsewhere, including<br />

future remuneration<br />

reviews.<br />

We’re also<br />

ensuring that<br />

postmasters<br />

share in<br />

profits from<br />

online<br />

platform<br />

products.<br />

More widely,<br />

we are always<br />

looking for new<br />

opportunities to<br />

improve branch<br />

profitability. You’ll be<br />

aware we have introduced<br />

in-branch sales with<br />

carriers other than Royal<br />

Mail, for example. We are<br />

also negotiating the next<br />

Banking Framework<br />

agreement, which will be<br />

a vital part of protecting<br />

remuneration, and we<br />

have secured a renewed<br />

commitment with Bank of<br />

Ireland, which will see us<br />

continue to provide a<br />

wide range of<br />

savings<br />

products<br />

online and<br />

in-branch.<br />

As you<br />

know, we<br />

now review<br />

remuneration<br />

annually, and we<br />

are committed to<br />

updating postmasters<br />

before the start of each<br />

financial year in April. We<br />

will endeavour to make<br />

future announcements as<br />

early as possible, but the<br />

timing is largely driven by<br />

budget setting processes,<br />

including the need to<br />

understand the impact of<br />

any Royal Mail tariff<br />

changes once they are<br />

announced.<br />

MEMBERS’ EDITOR<br />

REPLIES<br />

Many thanks to Martin<br />

Rudderham for his letter<br />

about increases in PO<br />

remuneration and the<br />

timing of any<br />

announcements of those<br />

“Many<br />

postmasters<br />

have had to dip<br />

more deeply into<br />

any profits they<br />

make”<br />

pay increases, and to Paul<br />

Liddiard for his response<br />

on behalf of PO.<br />

Postmasters, like any<br />

other businesspeople,<br />

have to plan ahead and<br />

budget. More so over the<br />

last two years because of<br />

the unprecedented<br />

swingeing increases in the<br />

cost of running a post<br />

office. These<br />

costs, primarily<br />

in employing<br />

staff and<br />

energy, have<br />

in no way<br />

been offset<br />

by increases<br />

in payments<br />

by PO. The result<br />

is that many<br />

postmasters have had to<br />

dip more deeply into any<br />

profits they may be<br />

making on any associated<br />

business or, in few cases,<br />

savings. This amounts to<br />

an unseen subsidy of PO,<br />

a government-owned<br />

institution, by the very<br />

postmasters who own and<br />

operate them. This must<br />

stop.<br />

It is interesting to<br />

consider Paul’s comments<br />

that increases in<br />

remuneration worth £30m<br />

have been announced for<br />

the current financial year<br />

and that perhaps more<br />

might flow through from<br />

the next Banking<br />

Framework agreement<br />

June 2024 The SubPostmaster 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!