Redefining Reality - The Intellectual Implications of Modern Science

Scientists largely hated this idea, in part because unique events seem
where all mass and energy is concentrated at a single point only to
explode into a universe like ours is tantamount to theology—it is
positing a creation event.
it also posed some problems.
If all mass and energy
were concentrated at
a point, the amount of
energy would be too
great to allow atoms or
even subatomic particles
to form.
If this point “exploded,”
then such a central force
would send the energy
out in a spherical wave,
but we see a chunky
universe, not a smooth one. The energy congealed into clumps
of mass in stars and galaxies with huge amounts of dead space
in between. What would account for the clumpiness of our
universe? How did we get the elements we have? How could
atoms have formed and collected into stars?
© forplayday/iStock/Thinkstock.
This last question was investigated by George Gamow. In an
important paper in 1948, Gamow and his graduate student Ralph
Alpher showed how the basic elements hydrogen and helium
concluded that there should be some energy remnants of the big
bang spread evenly throughout space. This energy should be
expansive universe.
43