16.04.2024 Views

April 2024 CSQ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

support. Better-off fathers, on the other hand, often received nominal<br />

orders. In fact, many divorced fathers did not have a monthly support order<br />

at all. Part of my job as a state attorney was to review lump sum divorce<br />

decrees to determine whether they satisfied a “best interests of the child”<br />

standard. It was then common for wives to get the house and a lump sum<br />

settlement of a few thousand dollars in lieu of a monthly support order<br />

during a child’s minority.<br />

This also was before UIFSA was enacted. We operated under the Uniform<br />

Reciprocal Enforcement of Child Support Act (URESA). In order to enforce<br />

child support orders across state lines, both states had to enter into a<br />

compact—a little like a bilateral agreement in international cases. Part of<br />

my job was to review new URESA agreements. My interstate child support<br />

case wasn’t going to go anywhere because Minnesota didn’t have a<br />

URESA agreement with Pennsylvania. I didn’t even try to enforce my case.<br />

I represented the state in several class action lawsuits challenging federal<br />

laws enacted in 1981 and 1984. My first case was a constitutional<br />

challenge to the tax offset program. In another case, the state joined<br />

families in challenging federal sibling deeming rules, which required all<br />

children in the household to apply for AFDC and assign their child support<br />

rights. We had affidavits from several parents who decided to change<br />

custody rather than assign their support payments or who stopped paying<br />

child support altogether. During my career, I’ve been privileged to work on<br />

two U.S. Supreme Court cases.<br />

Program architecture underlies family experiences. In late 1994, I<br />

began working as a policy analyst at a national policy advocacy<br />

organization called the Center for Law in Social Policy (CLASP) in<br />

Washington, DC, and later became its family policy director. I specialized in<br />

family policy for 15 years, focusing on low-income families and fathers,<br />

domestic violence, and prison re-entry, including the Second Chance Act. I<br />

also focused on the guts of the child support program: systems<br />

implementation, program structure, and financing. A major part of my job<br />

was legislative advocacy. I was often on the hill and in the media, and<br />

coordinated closely with state directors. I had a hand in almost every child<br />

support law passed by Congress between 1996 and 2009, when I became<br />

OCSS commissioner.<br />

1994 was truly an incredible time to return to the child support program.<br />

Three weeks into the job, I went to my first NCSEA policy forum. The<br />

conference was held at a pivotal point in the program’s history: the shift to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!