04.04.2024 Views

Module 4 - Introduction to Performance Audit_4B

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How does the planning process for a performance differ from planning for other types of<br />

engagements?<br />

How does your audit function conduct a pre-study for a performance engagement?<br />

Which information needed for the pre-study is readily accessible? Which information is<br />

harder <strong>to</strong> acquire?<br />

<strong>4B</strong>.3 <strong>Audit</strong> Objectives<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> objectives may be developed in conjunction with the subject matter or as a more<br />

detailed expansion of the outline <strong>to</strong>pic. The objectives state what the audit is intended <strong>to</strong><br />

accomplish.<br />

Internal audit standards for setting objectives focus on an assessment of risk as well as the<br />

potential for “significant errors, fraud, noncompliance, and other exposures.” 53 However, this<br />

does not address the specific requirements of a performance audit with the purpose of<br />

evaluating economy, effectiveness, and efficiency.<br />

Objectives serve as the basis for developing questions the audit is designed <strong>to</strong> answer.<br />

Objectives need <strong>to</strong> be clear, concise, objective, and measurable, and enable the audi<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong><br />

reach an unambiguous conclusion. The objectives also serve <strong>to</strong> communicate the purpose of<br />

the audit <strong>to</strong> stakeholders.<br />

The care taken in developing objectives can make the difference between a successful and<br />

an unsuccessful audit. Each objective should be written in the form of a question (or as<br />

statements beginning “<strong>to</strong> determine…”) and contain the following key elements:<br />

Subject (i.e., the subject matter – e.g., organization, program, program component,<br />

function, or activity).<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> aspects (i.e., what management is responsible for, namely carrying<br />

out public functions efficiently, economically, effectively, ethically, and equitably,<br />

while achieving desired program objectives.)<br />

Finding elements <strong>to</strong> be addressed according <strong>to</strong> the needs of the intended user (i.e.,<br />

one or more of condition, effect of the condition, significance of the effect, and<br />

potential solution).<br />

Criteria (<strong>to</strong> include agency goals, when available, even if such goals are found <strong>to</strong> be<br />

deficient and contributing <strong>to</strong> low performance).<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> focus/approach (how the objective may be investigated). 54<br />

Objectives may be formulated in different ways. The following examples are taken from<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> ISSAI Implementation Handbook:<br />

<br />

Problem-oriented approach: the objective is stated <strong>to</strong> include a short description<br />

of a known issue. For example, “<strong>to</strong> determine why the fisheries and environment<br />

department did not enforce key fisheries statutes and habitat policy.”<br />

53<br />

Standard 2210 – Engagement Objectives, The International Professional Practices<br />

Framework, The IIA, 2016.<br />

54<br />

Based on Rauum and Morgan, <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Audit</strong>ing: A Measurement Approach, The<br />

Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Research Foundation, 2009.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!