Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 13 GUEST CONTRIBUTION December <strong>2023</strong><br />
Trade is change, politics (too often) standstill<br />
Guest article by lawyer Niklas Langguth (law firm Langguth & Burbulla, Dusseldorf)<br />
The insolvency of Galeria<br />
Kaufhof was the final, momentous<br />
stage in a development<br />
that began with the Hertie insolvency<br />
several years ago and<br />
was announced much earlier.<br />
To date, there has been no<br />
comparable replacement for<br />
the loss of department stores,<br />
which were often the mainstay<br />
of city centers. In recent years,<br />
it has been possible to fill most<br />
of the Hertie vacancies with<br />
new concepts. This in itself<br />
has proven to be a challenge.<br />
This makes it all the more important<br />
to find promising and<br />
sustainable solutions within a<br />
reasonable period of time.<br />
The problem<br />
In the case of the Galeria insolvency,<br />
it is possible to draw<br />
on the experience gained from<br />
the revitalization of the Hertie<br />
stores. However, department<br />
stores are very individual locations<br />
and properties with commercial<br />
and real estate law problems<br />
that have often developed<br />
over decades. Accordingly, these<br />
properties can only rarely be<br />
restructured using a template.<br />
And where the commercial and<br />
legal aspects are usually difficult,<br />
there is a further problem:<br />
as a rule, these are locations that<br />
shape the district, and the municipal<br />
policy requirements for<br />
urban development are correspondingly<br />
high and varied.<br />
The developer‘s<br />
dilemma<br />
Niklas Langguth<br />
Project developers are often<br />
caught in a dilemma here: even<br />
an initial rough draft for the<br />
development of such properties<br />
involves considerable investment.<br />
If the developer then<br />
approaches the local authority<br />
with such a design, there is a<br />
high risk that the design will be<br />
disliked, torpedoed or discussed<br />
over several rounds.<br />
On the other hand, local authorities<br />
often do not feel compelled<br />
to embark on urban land-use<br />
planning on their own, despite<br />
the corresponding mandatory<br />
tasks. In these cases, it is possible<br />
to find out about the city‘s<br />
planning intentions. In this<br />
constellation, all too often something<br />
can only be initiated<br />
if an investor drafts a restructuring<br />
scenario at high risk, knowing<br />
full well that his design is<br />
unlikely to come to fruition and<br />
that a competitor may end up<br />
benefiting from the impetus if a<br />
planning process gets underway<br />
and is often only completed years<br />
later.<br />
The failure of many<br />
local authorities<br />
The problem with this constellation<br />
often lies in the inertia and<br />
inactivity of local authorities. A<br />
brownfield site the size of a department<br />
store in the best inner<br />
city area is an urban planning<br />
disaster that creates an urgent<br />
need for planning.<br />
The local authorities are not<br />
only entitled, they are legally<br />
obliged to comply with this<br />
planning requirement (Section<br />
1 (3) BauGB). The fact that this<br />
obligation is not enforceable because<br />
it is not legally enforceable<br />
against third parties often<br />
leads local authorities to ignore<br />
the legal obligation.<br />
The excuses are manifold, particularly<br />
popular and often heard:<br />
local authorities cannot afford<br />
it. One wonders: a local authority<br />
that does not see itself as capable<br />
of forward-looking planning<br />
even in the narrowest inner<br />
city area has obviously given<br />
up its urban planning will. Only<br />
when an investor appears on the<br />
scene do most local authorities<br />
begin to think seriously about<br />
their urban planning ideas.<br />
This usually leads to extensive<br />
discussions and arguments between<br />
the council factions until<br />
there is nothing left of the investor‘s<br />
design. Only then does<br />
the city start a planning process,<br />
but it often comes to a standstill<br />
again when the investor leaves<br />
in frustration. Then the game<br />
often starts all over again with a<br />
new investor.<br />
What the local authorities overlook<br />
is that times have changed.<br />
When the Hertie bankruptcy<br />
had to be overcome, online platform<br />
retail took its first steps. In<br />
the meantime, online retail has<br />
taken substantial market shares<br />
from bricks-and-mortar retailers.<br />
A city center location is no<br />
longer a guarantee that an investor<br />
will take the risks that such<br />
a location entails and wait patiently<br />
until the municipality has<br />
finished its discussions. At the<br />
same time, business taxes from<br />
city center retail are generally<br />
a significant proportion of municipal<br />
revenues. If a solution is<br />
not found quickly for the derelict<br />
site, the remaining inner-city<br />
retail trade could be damaged<br />
along with the department store<br />
and, in the worst case, become<br />
deserted.<br />
Unlike 15 years ago, the local<br />
authorities do not have time<br />
to wait until, after several attempts,<br />
an investor comes up<br />
with an idea that suits all political<br />
groups. If the local authorities<br />
want to design their city<br />
centers effectively in the current<br />
situation and preserve city center<br />
retail, they will have to become<br />
active in planning. And they<br />
will have to do this themselves,<br />
as they are legally obliged to do<br />
so anyway.<br />
You almost want to shout to the<br />
local authorities concerned: Do<br />
your job!