02.01.2024 Views

The Queen's College Record 2023

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Credit: John Cairns<br />

FROM THE BURSAR<br />

Dr Andrew Timms<br />

Bursar<br />

<strong>The</strong> past financial year was dominated by concerns about<br />

inflation. Energy costs were initially the main worry: they<br />

had doubled (from roughly £450k to £900k per annum in<br />

an overall operating budget of nearly £11m), and forecasts<br />

ranged from the troubling to the terrifying. However, as the<br />

year wore on it became clear that the budgeted expenditure<br />

on this front was unlikely to be exceeded. This meant that<br />

we could get back to a more traditional worry—pay. <strong>The</strong><br />

cost-of-living crisis has bitten the <strong>College</strong>’s employees<br />

particularly hard: Oxford is an acutely expensive city in<br />

which to work and live (particularly in respect of housing<br />

costs). <strong>The</strong> <strong>College</strong> accelerated several pay awards and in particular brought forward<br />

by several months its implementation of the annual increase in the Oxford Living<br />

Wage, which is an enhanced version of the national Living Wage Foundation wage<br />

for those earning the lowest salaries in <strong>College</strong>. Our lowest-paid workers have<br />

therefore probably not seen their pay eroded in real terms, but, as is common across<br />

society as a whole, many other employees are poorer now than they were a couple<br />

of years ago, and this comes against a particular backdrop of longstanding concerns<br />

about academic pay and conditions. <strong>The</strong> challenges on this front are very<br />

considerable.<br />

Reports and <strong>College</strong> Activities<br />

When I became Bursar, my predecessor told me that the <strong>College</strong>’s financial<br />

model was well positioned for periods of high inflation. <strong>The</strong> general idea is that an<br />

endowment that is heavily invested in equities will retain its purchasing power. This<br />

sounds plausible but it is not hard to find historical periods when it has not worked<br />

well. That is one way of introducing the performance of the endowment, which<br />

generated a total return of around 8%; this return comprised solid equity growth<br />

(we are almost exclusively a passive investor nowadays: discuss!), a small decrease<br />

in commercial property valuations, and a notable uplift in agricultural property.<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter relates in particular to the disposal of two parcels of land for residential<br />

development at Keresley, Coventry, which occurred after the year-end and is a<br />

pleasing conclusion to many decades of careful and patient work by the <strong>College</strong> and<br />

my predecessors. My working rule is that if an investment goal takes X decades to<br />

be achieved, the Fellows will take X minutes to plan to spend it: in that sense it may<br />

be reassuring that we have maintained our methodical and disciplined approach to<br />

the financial management of the <strong>College</strong>, noting that ‘windfalls’ like Keresley (which<br />

will generate receipts of some £25m) simply increase the amount of income the<br />

<strong>College</strong> can sustainably draw from its investments. Slow and steady wins the race.<br />

<strong>The</strong> word sustainably in the preceding paragraph points to another growing concern.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>College</strong> does not currently have an express policy on environmental sustainability<br />

<strong>College</strong> <strong>Record</strong> <strong>2023</strong> | <strong>The</strong> Queen’s <strong>College</strong> 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!