28.12.2012 Views

environmental impact statement kilmainhamwood compost facility ...

environmental impact statement kilmainhamwood compost facility ...

environmental impact statement kilmainhamwood compost facility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5361- Kilmainhamwood Compost Facility Extension- EIS<br />

• Establishing channels of communication between the Contractor/Developer, Local Authority and<br />

local Residents;<br />

Furthermore, it is envisaged that a variety of practicable noise control measures will be employed.<br />

These may include:<br />

• Selection of plant with low inherent potential for generation of noise and/or vibration;<br />

• Erection of temporary barriers around items such as generators or high duty compressors. For<br />

maximum effectiveness, a barrier should be positioned as close as possible to either the noise<br />

source or receiver. The barrier should be constructed of material with a mass of > 7kg/m2 and<br />

should have no gaps or joints in the barrier material. As a rough guide, the length of a barrier<br />

should be 5 times greater than its height. A shorter barrier should be bent around the noise<br />

source, to ensure no part of the noise source is visible from the receiving location.<br />

• Siting of noisy plant as far away from sensitive properties as permitted by site constraints.<br />

10.4.2 Operational Phase<br />

The design of the site has been laid out so as to minimise noise <strong>impact</strong> on the surrounding<br />

environment. All major noise producing plant associated with the proposed <strong>facility</strong> is to be located within<br />

the site buildings and not in the open air.<br />

This design in itself provides significant noise mitigation advantages in that the noise reaching sensitive<br />

receptors and indeed the site boundaries is much curtailed due to horizontal distance separation.<br />

Worst case operational noise levels are predicted to comfortably comply within the EPA Guidance Note<br />

For Noise In Relation To Scheduled Activities which outlines a limit of a free-field LAr, T value of 55dB<br />

by daytime (08:00 – 22:00), at any noise sensitive location and one of 45dB for night operations. As<br />

such, no further mitigation is required for the operational phase of the development.<br />

For inspection purposes only.<br />

Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.<br />

As per EPA guidance (see Note 1 below), if a tonal component is detected during noise monitoring<br />

following the construction phase, a +5dB(A) penalty is added to the measured equivalent continuous Aweighted<br />

sound pressure level (LAeq) so as to determine the potential receptor response to the<br />

measured noise.<br />

To date, noise monitoring has been undertaken in accordance with EPA guidance and as per the<br />

requirements of the existing EPA waste licence. Results from noise monitoring undertaken to date<br />

(since the existing <strong>facility</strong> commenced operations in September 2006) have been in compliance with the<br />

EPA waste licence limits.<br />

Should a tone be observed during noise monitoring post installation of the proposed additional fans, this<br />

would incur the 5dB penalty (as outlined above), and would result in an exceedance of the 55dB LAeq<br />

limit during daytime hours. As such if a tone were to be detected during noise monitoring, it would have<br />

to be engineered out to meet day time limits. However it is not expected that this will arise, as there is<br />

157<br />

EPA Export 01-06-2010:03:55:59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!