Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 <strong>Frontline</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> scion of a feudal family of Sindh and a former foreign minister,<br />
Bhutto was seen as the savior of the new <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>. He successfully<br />
negotiated with India the release of 90,000 troops taken prisoner by<br />
Indian forces. He had come to power with the largest support base of<br />
any <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i leader since the inception of the country in 1947. But he<br />
failed to sustain the confidence of the nation. Bhutto was ideally placed<br />
to put into practice the objective of social democracy and develop<br />
secular ideas and institutions. But it did not happen. Bhutto’s strategy<br />
was to bring the disparate elements of this divided society together<br />
through a kind of <strong>Islam</strong>ic nationalism, which was then supposed to<br />
create the cohesion and stability necessary for socialist economic<br />
reforms, but unfortunately all Bhutto succeeded in doing was to<br />
rehabilitate religious extremism. Under pressure from the religious<br />
parties whose cooperation they were courting, Bhutto’s government<br />
increased the religious content in school syllabuses and, succumbing<br />
to pressure from Saudi Arabia as well as to the demands of religious<br />
parties, declared the Ahmedis, an <strong>Islam</strong>ic sect, to be non-Muslim. 4 This<br />
apparently minor action had long-term implications for the country as<br />
it fuelled <strong>Islam</strong>ic zealotry and sharpened the sectarian divide. Bhutto’s<br />
attempt to co-opt religious elements merely emboldened them, and<br />
eventually the clergy joined hands with their traditional ally, the<br />
military, to plot the overthrow of his government.<br />
Bhutto’s attempt to establish an authoritarian rule led him to rely more<br />
and more on the coercive apparatus of the state and the intelligence<br />
agencies. Bhutto did little to strengthen democratic institutions and<br />
to make the process of democratic reform irreversible. Instead, his<br />
entire effort was aimed at promoting a personalized rule. He did not<br />
trust anyone. Given his overwhelming paranoia and insecurity, Bhutto<br />
geared up the ISI to keep surveillance not only on his opponents,<br />
but also on his own party men and cabinet ministers. <strong>The</strong> agency<br />
kept dossiers on politicians, bureaucrats, judges and anyone else<br />
considered important.<br />
<strong>The</strong> collapse of democratic institutions and the Constitution’s loss<br />
of sanctity created a vacuum of authority that provided a favourable<br />
condition for the Bonapartist generals. Bhutto’s use of the army to crush<br />
the uprising in <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s western province of Balochistan provided an<br />
opportunity to the military to reassert itself in the country’s politics.<br />
Bhutto’s politics of expediency and attempts to appease the country’s<br />
religious lobby allowed the <strong>Islam</strong>ists, who were routed in the 1971<br />
elections, to revive themselves. A nationwide agitation, led by right-