28.12.2012 Views

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 <strong>Frontline</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> scion of a feudal family of Sindh and a former foreign minister,<br />

Bhutto was seen as the savior of the new <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>. He successfully<br />

negotiated with India the release of 90,000 troops taken prisoner by<br />

Indian forces. He had come to power with the largest support base of<br />

any <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i leader since the inception of the country in 1947. But he<br />

failed to sustain the confidence of the nation. Bhutto was ideally placed<br />

to put into practice the objective of social democracy and develop<br />

secular ideas and institutions. But it did not happen. Bhutto’s strategy<br />

was to bring the disparate elements of this divided society together<br />

through a kind of <strong>Islam</strong>ic nationalism, which was then supposed to<br />

create the cohesion and stability necessary for socialist economic<br />

reforms, but unfortunately all Bhutto succeeded in doing was to<br />

rehabilitate religious extremism. Under pressure from the religious<br />

parties whose cooperation they were courting, Bhutto’s government<br />

increased the religious content in school syllabuses and, succumbing<br />

to pressure from Saudi Arabia as well as to the demands of religious<br />

parties, declared the Ahmedis, an <strong>Islam</strong>ic sect, to be non-Muslim. 4 This<br />

apparently minor action had long-term implications for the country as<br />

it fuelled <strong>Islam</strong>ic zealotry and sharpened the sectarian divide. Bhutto’s<br />

attempt to co-opt religious elements merely emboldened them, and<br />

eventually the clergy joined hands with their traditional ally, the<br />

military, to plot the overthrow of his government.<br />

Bhutto’s attempt to establish an authoritarian rule led him to rely more<br />

and more on the coercive apparatus of the state and the intelligence<br />

agencies. Bhutto did little to strengthen democratic institutions and<br />

to make the process of democratic reform irreversible. Instead, his<br />

entire effort was aimed at promoting a personalized rule. He did not<br />

trust anyone. Given his overwhelming paranoia and insecurity, Bhutto<br />

geared up the ISI to keep surveillance not only on his opponents,<br />

but also on his own party men and cabinet ministers. <strong>The</strong> agency<br />

kept dossiers on politicians, bureaucrats, judges and anyone else<br />

considered important.<br />

<strong>The</strong> collapse of democratic institutions and the Constitution’s loss<br />

of sanctity created a vacuum of authority that provided a favourable<br />

condition for the Bonapartist generals. Bhutto’s use of the army to crush<br />

the uprising in <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s western province of Balochistan provided an<br />

opportunity to the military to reassert itself in the country’s politics.<br />

Bhutto’s politics of expediency and attempts to appease the country’s<br />

religious lobby allowed the <strong>Islam</strong>ists, who were routed in the 1971<br />

elections, to revive themselves. A nationwide agitation, led by right-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!