Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 0 <strong>Frontline</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />
the first time that the head of <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s nuclear weapons programme<br />
revealed the country’s nuclear status. Apparently the interview was<br />
meant to warn India that <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> could use a nuclear weapon in the<br />
event of a war. <strong>The</strong> statement was later confirmed by General Zia himself<br />
in another interview. <strong>The</strong> development raised serious international<br />
concerns. <strong>The</strong> US Congress passed the Pressler Amendment in 1985,<br />
requiring sanctions against <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>, unless the President certified<br />
that <strong>Islam</strong>abad was not developing nuclear weapons. <strong>The</strong> Reagan<br />
administration warned <strong>Islam</strong>abad of dire consequences if it crossed<br />
the threshold of ‘five per cent’ enrichment. 15 But, because of <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s<br />
crucial role in the covert operation in Afghanistan, the USA continued<br />
to ignore <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s progress towards nuclear capability.<br />
Most nuclear experts agree that 1985 was the watershed in <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s<br />
nuclear weapons programme. That was the year when <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />
developed nuclear-grade enrichment. <strong>The</strong> US intelligence agencies<br />
concluded in 1986 that <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> had acquired nominal capability<br />
sufficient to produce enough weapons-grade uranium material to<br />
build six to seven nuclear bombs each year. 16 . Yet President Reagan<br />
continued to certify that <strong>Islam</strong>abad did not possess nuclear weapons,<br />
thus allowing the flow of aid to <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>, which had become the<br />
linchpin in the West’s war against the Soviet communist bloc.<br />
<strong>The</strong> death of General Zia in August 1988, in a mysterious air crash,<br />
and the restoration of democracy did not bring about any significant<br />
change in <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s nuclear policy. Under the new civilian government,<br />
the country’s nuclear programme continued to be run by the military<br />
and the President. Benazir Bhutto, who was elected Prime Minister in<br />
December 1988, was kept out of the loop. She was not even allowed<br />
to visit the Kahuta facility during her first term as chief executive from<br />
December 1988 to August 1990. During her state visit to Washington<br />
in 1989, Benazir Bhutto assured the US Congress that <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> neither<br />
possessed a nuclear bomb nor did it intend to build one. But she<br />
was shocked when the US intelligence officials told her about the<br />
actual status of <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s nuclear programme. After the ousting of<br />
her government, Benazir Bhutto maintained in an interview with ABC<br />
television that she was kept in the dark about the programme. 17 That<br />
the elected Prime Minister had no control or even knowledge of the<br />
nuclear weapons programme was a sad commentary on the state of<br />
the civil and military relationship and <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i democracy. 18<br />
Following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1990,<br />
<strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s usefulness for the USA as a frontline state also came to an