28.12.2012 Views

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kashmir<br />

11<br />

border to help their Kashmiri brethren. <strong>The</strong>y were not prepared to give<br />

up the cause on <strong>Islam</strong>abad’s orders. As an inevitable consequence of<br />

<strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s policy of using jihad as an instrument of covert war, some<br />

elements within the intelligence agencies had been radicalized by the<br />

<strong>Islam</strong>ists. <strong>The</strong> handlers had become coloured by the ideology of the<br />

militants. <strong>The</strong>y were unhappy with Musharraf’s decision to support<br />

America’s war on Afghanistan’s <strong>Islam</strong>ic regime, which they had<br />

helped install. But even deeper was the resentment on the reversal<br />

in Kashmir. <strong>The</strong>re was a strong anti-American feeling in the military<br />

ranks. Many officers believed that western countries, particularly the<br />

USA, had not come to <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s support when it faced the threat of<br />

war from its nuclear rival.<br />

Once again Musharraf was walking a tightrope. His position had<br />

become even more tenuous after he ordered his troops to stop the<br />

infiltration. He had come to the conclusion that there was now a<br />

conflict of interest between the militants and the military. But it was<br />

not clear whether other army officers agreed with him. <strong>The</strong>re was a<br />

strong feeling in the army that India was trying to humiliate them by<br />

dictating terms for peace. Some hardline retired generals, who had<br />

been responsible for organizing the Kashmiri ‘jihad’, warned Musharraf<br />

that there was a limit to how far the army would go along with a policy<br />

of using force against those who were seen as fighting for <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s<br />

interest in Kashmir. Lt.-General Hamid Gul, a former ISI chief and<br />

a fiercely anti-American former commander, accused Musharraf of<br />

‘going too far in appeasing the west’ and taking a ‘step back’ on the<br />

Kashmir issue. ‘By calling those attacking the Indian forces, terrorists,<br />

General Musharraf is only echoing the Indian position,’ he declared. 27<br />

Despite military de-escalation, there was a wide gap between what<br />

the Indian leaders demanded and what Musharraf could deliver. India’s<br />

mistrust of the <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i military leadership had thwarted all moves by<br />

the international community to bring the two sides to the negotiating<br />

table. It was only after the relatively peaceful polls for the Kashmir<br />

state assembly in October 2002, that Delhi and <strong>Islam</strong>abad opened<br />

secret back-channel diplomacy. Beginning in April 2003, Vajpayee’s<br />

Principal Secretary, Brajesh Mishra, and Musharraf’s top aide, Tariq<br />

Aziz, held several meetings in London, Dubai and Bangkok exploring<br />

avenues to begin a peace process. 28<br />

A seasoned bureaucrat, Tariq Aziz was a college-mate of Musharraf’s<br />

and had worked as his principal secretary after the military takeover.<br />

A former income tax officer, he was more into political wheeling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!